Application of Two Dimensional Wavelet Transform to the Visualization of Glass Fibers in a Turbulent Flame

  • S. Belaïd
  • D. Lebrun
  • C. Özkul


In different manufacturing processes, glass fibers are drawn out in a turbulent flame. Our purpose is to determine the 3-D trajectory of fibers whose diameter lies in the range [10–30 μm]. The sample volume can be visualized by using techniques such as high-speed in-line holography.1 Then, the reconstructed field is analysed in our laboratory by a CCD camera linked to an image digitizer. A 3-D translation of the holographic plate allows the focusing on each fiber element to be updated. This is tedious work. When the reconstructed images are constrated enough, automated following of the trajectories facilitates human based analysis.2 Numerous works have been published concerning the automation of the reconstruction step for particle holograms.3–5 However, the random spatial distributions of temperature induce a strong local variation of the refractive index. Consequently, the holographic images are altered and the focusing step of the automatic reconstruction is not very reliable. Other methods which eliminate the need for focusing mustrtherefore be envisaged.


Wavelet Transform Turbulent Flame Fiber Element Holographic Image Optical Transfer Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    C.S. Vikram, Particle Field Holography, Cambridge University Press (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Özkul, D. Lebrun and D. Allano, Trajectographie automatique 3-D de fibres de verre restituées par holographie, J. of Optics, 23(5):207 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Haussmann and W. Lauterborn, Determination of size and position of fast moving glass bubbles in liquids by digital 3-D image processing of hologram reconstructions, App. Opt. 19:3529 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.C. Stanton, H.J. Caulfield and G.W Stewart, An approach for automated analysis of particles holograms, Opt. Engineering 23(5):577 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H.J. Caulfieid, Automated analysis of particle holograms, Opt. Engineering 24(3):462 (1985)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. Özkul, D. Lebrun, D. Allano, M. A. Abdelghani-Idrissi, A. Leduc, Processing of glass cylinder diffraction patterns scanned with a photodiode array: influence of the Optical Transfer Function of diodes on dimensional measurements, Opt. Engineering, 30 (12),: 1855–1861, (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Lebrun, C. Özkul, D. Allano, A. Leduc, Use of the moiré effect to improve the diameter measurements with charge coupled imagers, J. of Optics, 22(4): 175, (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Onural and M. T. Özgen, Extraction of the three dimensional object location information directly from in-line holograms using Wigner analysis, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 9(2):252 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. Onural, Diffraction from a wavelet point of view, Opt. Letters, 18(11):846(1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    W. L. Anderson and H. Diao, Two dimensional wavelet transform and application to holographic particle velocimetry, App. Optics, 34(2):249, 1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. Onural and P. D. Scott, Digital decoding of in-line holograms, Opt. Eng., 26(11):1124, (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.F. Muzy, E. Bacry and A. Arneodo, «Wavelets and multifractal Formalism for Singular Signals: Application to Turbulence Data», Phys. Rev. letters, Vol. 67(25),, pp. 3515–3518, (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Belaïd
    • 1
  • D. Lebrun
    • 1
  • C. Özkul
    • 1
  1. 1.URA CNRS 230-CORIAMont-Saint-Aignan CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations