Skip to main content

When We should be Testing, How often and what to Report

  • Chapter
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 349))

  • 210 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter will offer practical suggestions for clinical microbiologists to help establish cost-effective policies for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria and efficient reporting of information to guide antimicrobial therapy. The cost of antimicrobic therapy greatly exceeds the cost of the bacteriology laboratory. Therefore, the combined efforts of the microbiologist, the pharmacist and the medical staff should be focused on producing information that reduces antimicrobic cost.1 Procedures will be recommended here to minimize the production of clinically unnecessary information and the reporting of excessive data that is potentially confusing to clinicians. The practices described are based on over 30 years of cooperative effort between the Microbiology Laboratory, Pharmacy Services and the Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine at Hartford Hospital. These efforts have reduced the percentage of antimicrobic cost in our pharmacy budget to about 15%. Nationally it is more typical for 30–50% of pharmacy budgets to be consumed by antimicrobic use.2,3 Further, about 20,000,000 bacterial isolates are subject to antimicrobial susceptibility testing in the nation’s laboratories annually.4 Compared to one other major center of comparable size and volume of testing we perform one fifth the number of antimicrobial susceptibility tests (Table 1). This results largely from controls that we have imposed on the quality of specimens and the extent of testing that is performed.5 Studies have shown that the cost for microbiologic processing in our laboratory is lower than that for conventional processing without controls.6

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L.D. Edwards, S. Levin, R. Balastra, Ordering Patterns and Utilization of Bacteriologic Culture Reports, Arch Intern Med. 132:678–682 (1973).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. S.L. Barriere, Controversies in Antimicrobial Therapy: Formulary Decisions on Third-Generation Cephalosporins, Am J. Hosp Pharm. 43:625 (1986).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M.D. Parr, L.A. Hansen, W.W. Waite, Computer Program for Comparing Total Costs of Intravenous Antibiotic Regimens. Am J Hosp Pharm 43:2189 (1986).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Preissler, Personal Communication

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.C. Bartlett, Cost Containment in Microbiology, Clin Lab Med. 5:761–791 (1985).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. R.C. Bartlett, C. Rutz, Processing Control and Cost in Bacteriology, Am J Clin Pathol 74:287–296 (1980).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A.L. Barry, P.B. Smith, M. Tuck, Cumulative Techniques and Procedures in Clinical Microbiology, Laboratory Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Infections, CUMITECH 2 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.C. Bartlett, N. Treiber, Clinical Significance of Mixed Bacterial Cultures of Urine, Am J Clin Pathol 82:319–322 (1984).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J.M. Swenson, B.C. Hill, C. Thornsberry, Screening Pneumococci for Penicillin Resistance J Clin Microbiol 24:749–752 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D.M. Jones, E.M. Sutcliffe, Meningococci with Reduced Susceptibility to Penicillin, Lancet 335: 863–864 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J.A. Waitz, G.V. Doern, S.M. Finegold, Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grown Aerobically, NCCLS Doc. M7–A2, Vol. 10

    Google Scholar 

  12. P.D. Ellner, H.C. Neu, The Inhibitory Quotient: A Method for Interpreting Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Data, JAMA 246:1575.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D.J. Damron, J.W. Warren, G.R. Chippendale, Do Clinical Microbiology Laboratories Report Complete Bacteriology in Urine from Patients with Long-Term Urinary Catheters, J Clin Microbiol 24:400–404 (1986).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bartlett, R.C. (1994). When We should be Testing, How often and what to Report. In: Poupard, J.A., Walsh, L.R., Kleger, B. (eds) Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 349. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9206-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9206-5_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9208-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9206-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics