Advertisement

Recently Recovered Specimens of North American Eocene Omomyids and Adapids and Their Bearing on Debates about Anthropoid Origins

  • Herbert H. Covert
  • Blythe A. Williams
Part of the Advances in Primatology book series (AIPR)

Abstract

Most recent reviews of primate evolution recognize that modern primates can be divided into two monophyletic suborders, the Strepsirhini (lemuriforms and lorisiforms) and the Haplorhini (tarsiers, monkeys, apes, and humans). It is also accepted by most researchers that the radiation of modern primate taxa dates to at least the beginning of the Eocene. The earliest occurring animals that appear to be seeded within this radiation belong to the families Adapidae and Omomyidae, the Eocene euprimates (Hoffstetter, 1974; Szalay and Del-son, 1979; Covert, 1986; MacPhee and Cartmill, 1986; Martin, 1986; Wible and Covert, 1987; and Szalay et al., 1987).

Keywords

Sexual Dimorphism Middle Eocene Late Eocene Medial Malleolus Anthropoid Primate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beard, K. C., Dagosto, M., Gebo, D. L. and Godinot, M. 1988. Interrelationships among primate higher taxa. Nature 331:712–714.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beard, K. C., Krishtalka, L. and Stucky, R. K. 1991. First skulls of the early Eocene primate Shoshonius cooperi and the anthropoid-tarsier dichotomy. Nature 349:64–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beard, K. C., Qi, T., Dawson, M. R., and Wang, B. 1994. A diverse new primate fauna from middle Eocene fissure-fillings in southeastern China. Nature 368:604–609.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cartmill, M., and Kay, R. F. 1978. Craniodental morphology, Tarsius affinities, and primate suborders. In: D. J. Chivers and K. A. Joysey (eds.), Recent Advances in Primatology, Vol, 3, Evolution, pp. 205–214. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  5. Covert, H. H. 1985. Adaptations and evolutionary relationships of the Eocene primate family Notharctidae. Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University.Google Scholar
  6. Covert, H. H. 1986. Biology of early Cenozoic primates. In: D. R. Swindler and J. Erwin (eds.), Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. 1: Systematics, Evolution, and Anatomy, pp. 335–359. Alan R. Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Covert, H. H. 1988. Ankle and foot morphology of Cantius mckennai: Adaptations and phylogene- tic implications. J. Hum. Evol.17:57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Covert, H. H., and Hamrick, M. W. 1993. Description of new skeletal remains of the early Eocene anaptomorphine primate Absarokius (Omomyidae) and a discussion about its adaptive profile. J. Hum. Evol, 25:351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Covert, H. H., and Williams, B. A. 1991. The anterior lower dentition of Washakius iusignis and adapid—anthropoidean affinities. J. Hum, Evol.21:463–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dagosto, M. 1985. The distal tibia of primates with special reference to the Omomyidae. Int. J. Primatol, 6:45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dagosto, M. 1988. Implications of postcranial evidence for the origin of euprimates. J. Hum, Evol.17:35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fleagle, J. G. 1988. Primate Adaptation & Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  13. Fleagle, D. G., and Simons, E. L. 1983. The tibio-fibular articulation in Apidium phiomense, an Oligocene anthropoid. Nature 301:238–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fleagle, J. G., Kay, R. F., and Simons, E. L. 1980. Sexual dimorphism in early anthropoids. Nature 287:328–330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gebo, D. L. 1987. Anthropoid origins—the foot evidence. J. Hum. Evol.15:421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gebo, D. L. 1988. Foot morphology and locomotor adaptation in Eocene primates. Fol. Primatol, 50:3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gebo, D. L., Dagosto, M., and Rose, K. D. 1991. Foot morphology and evolution in early Eocene Canttus. Am. J. Fhys. Anthropol.86:51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gingerich, P. D. 1977. Dental variation in early Eocene Feilhardina belgica with notes on the anterior dentition of some early Tarsiiformes. Fol. Frimatol.28:144–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gingerich, P. D. 1980. Eocene Adapidae, paleobiogeography, and the origin of South American Platyrrhini. In: R. L. Giochon and A. B. Ghiarelli (eds.), Evolutionary Biology of New World Monkeys and Continental Drift, pp. 123–138. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gingerich, P. D. 1981a. Early Cenozoic Omomyidae and the evolutionary history of the Tarsiiform primates. J. Hum. Evol.10:345–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gingerich, P. D. 1981b. Cranial morphology and adaptations in Eocene Adapidae. I. Sexual dimorphism in Adapts magnus and Adapts parisiensis. Am. J. Fhys. Anthropol.56:217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gingerich, P. D., and Schoeninger, M. 1977. The fossil record and primate phylogeny. J. Hum. Evol, 6:483–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gingerich, P. D., Dashzeveg, D., and Russell, D. E. 1991. Dentition and systematic relationships of Altanius orlovi (Mammalia, Primates) from the early Eocene of Mongolia. Geobios 24:637–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Godinot, M., and Dagosto, M. 1983. The astragalus of Necrolemur (Primates, Microchoerinae). J. Faleontol.57:1321–1324.Google Scholar
  25. Godinot, M., and Mahboubi, M. 1992. Earliest known simian primate from Algeria. Nature 357:324–326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goodman, M. 1992. Molecular systematica of the Primates. Am, J. Fhys. Anthropol, [Suppl] 14:82–83.Google Scholar
  27. Gregory, W. K. 1915. I. On the relationships of the Eocene lemur Notharetus to the Adapidae and to other primates. Bull, Geol, Soc. Am.26:419–446.Google Scholar
  28. Gregory, W. K. 1920. On the structure and relations of Notharetus, an American Eocene primate. Mem. Am. Mus. Nat, Hist. N.S.3(2):49–243.Google Scholar
  29. Hoffstetter, R. 1974. Phylogeny and geographical deployment of the primates. J. Hum, Evol.3:327–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kay, R. F. 1980. Platyrrhine origins: A reappraisal of the dental evidence. In: R. L. Ciochon and A. B. Ghiarelli (eds.), Evolutionary Biology of New World Monkeys and Continental Drift, pp. 159–188. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kay, R. F., and Simons, E. L. 1983. Dental formulae and dental eruption patterns in Para- pithecidae (Primates, Anthropoidea). Am. Fhys. Anthropol.62:363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krishtalka, L., Stucky, R. K., and Beard, K.C 1990. The earliest fossil evidence for sexual dimorphism in primates. Froc. Natl. Acad. Sci, USA 87:5223–5226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Laneque, L. 1992. Analyse de matrice de distance euclidienne de la region du museau chez Adapts (Adapiformes, Eocene). CR. Acad, Sci. Farts \Ser. II] 314:1387–1393.Google Scholar
  34. Luckett, W. P. 1975. Ontogeny of the fetal membranes and placenta. In: W. P. Luckett and F. S. Szalay (eds.), Phylogeny of the Primates, pp. 157–182. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MacPhee, R. D. E., and Cartmill, M. 1986. Basicranial structures and primate systematics. In: D. R. Swindler and J. Erwin (eds.), Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. 1: Systematics, Evolution, and Anatomy, pp. 219–276. Alan R. Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Martin, R. D. 1986. Primates: A definition. In: B. A. Wood, L. B. Martin, and P. Andrews (eds.), Major- Topics in Primate and Human Evolution, pp. 1–31. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  37. Martin, R. D. 1990. Primate Origins and Evolution: A Phylogenetic Reconstruction. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  38. Pocock, R. I. 1918. On the external characters of the lemurs and Tarsius. Proc. Zool. Soc. Loud.1918:19–53.Google Scholar
  39. Rasmussen, D. T. 1986. Anthropoid origins: A possible solution to the Adapidae—Omomyidae paradox. J. Hum. Evol.15:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rose, K. D., and Bown, T. M. 1991. Additional fossil evidence on the differentiation of the earliest euprimates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:98–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosenberger, A. L., Strasser, E., and Delson, E. 1985. Anterior dentition of Notharctus and the adapid—anthropoid hypothesis. Fol. Primatol.44:15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Simons, E. L. 1961. Notes on Eocene tarsioids and a revision of some Necrolemurinae. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Geol.5(3):43–69.Google Scholar
  43. Simons, E. L. 1990. Discovery of the oldest known anthropoidean skull from the Paleogene of Egypt. Science 247:1567–1569.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Simons, E. L., and Rasmussen, D. T. 1989. Cranial morphology of Aegyptopithecus and Tarsius and the question of the tarsier—anthropoidean clade. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.79:1–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Szalay, E. S. 1976. Systematica of the Omomyidae (Tarsiiformes, Primates): Taxonomy, phylogeny, and adaptations. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat, Hist.156(3): 157–450.Google Scholar
  46. Szalay, E. S., and Delson, E. 1979. Evolutionary History of the Primates. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  47. Szalay, F. S., Rosenberger, A. L., and Dagosto, M. 1987. Diagnosis and differentiation of the Order Primates. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol, 30:75–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wible, J. R., and Covert, H. H. 1987. Primates: Cladistic diagnosis and relationships.J. Hum. Evol.16:1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Herbert H. Covert
    • 1
  • Blythe A. Williams
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations