Advertisement

The Different Meanings of a Tarsioid — Anthropoid Clade and a New Model of Anthropoid Origin

  • D. Tab Rasmussen
Part of the Advances in Primatology book series (AIPR)

Abstract

Since the early part of this century there has been widespread but not universal acceptance of the idea that among the living prosimians the species most closely related to anthropoids are the extant tarsiers. This idea of a tarsieranthropoid clade among the living primates was first clearly formulated by Hubrecht (1896, 1902, 1908, 1909), Wortman (1903, 1904a,b), and Pocock (1918) on the basis of placentation, intrabullar carotid circulation, and the structure of the upper lip and rhinarium, among other features. Since then, additional morphological, biochemical, and molecular resemblances between tarsiers and anthropoids have been identified and promoted as shared-derived features indicating common ancestry (e.g., Luckett, 1974; Noback, 1975; Hershkovitz, 1977; Cartmill, 1980; Baba et al., 1982; MacPhee and Cartmill, 1986; Pollock and Mullin, 1987). Contradictory and ambiguous evidence regularly appears (Starck, 1956; Barnicot and Hewett-Emmett, 1974; Sarich and Cronin, 1976; Cronin and Sarich, 1980; Bonner et al., 1980; Mai, 1985; Poorman et al., 1985), but usually these results have been ignored or are considered to have resulted from methodological errors or convergent evolution.

Keywords

Fossil Record World Monkey Middle Eocene Late Eocene Continental Drift 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Archibald, J. D. 1977. Ectotympanic bone and internal carotid circulation of eutherians in reference to anthropoid origins. J. Hum. Evol. 6:609–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baba, M. L., Weiss, M. L., Goodman, M., and Czelusniak, J. 1982. The case of the tarsier hemoglobin. Syst. Zool. 31:156–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnicott, N. A., and Hewett-Emmett, D. 1974. Electrophoretic studies on prosimian blood proteins. In: R. D. Martin, G. A. Doyle, and A. C. Walker (eds.), Prosimian Biology, pp. 891–902. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
  4. Beard, K. G., Dagosto, M., Gebo, D. L., and Godinot, M. 1988. Interrelationships among primate higher taxa. Nature 331:712–714.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beard, K. G., Krishtalka, L., Stucky, R. K. 1991. First skulls of the early Eocene primate Shoshonius cooperi and the anthropoid-tarsier dichotomy. Nature 349:64–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Black, G. G. 1978. Anthracotheriidae. In: V.J. Maglio and H. B. S. Cooke (eds.), Evolution of African Mammals, pp. 423–434. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Bonis, L. de, Jaeger, J.-J., Coiffait, B., and Coiffait, P.-E. 1988. Découverte du plus ancien primate catarrhinien connu dans l’Éocène supérieur d’Afrique du Nord. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris [II] 306:929–934.Google Scholar
  8. Bonner, T. I., Heinemann, R., and Tadaro, G. J. 1980. Evolution of DNA sequences has been retarded in Malagasy primates. Nature 286:420–423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bown, T. M., and Simons, E. L. 1984. First record of marsupials (Metatheria: Polyprotodonta) from the Oligocene in Africa. Nature 308:447–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cachel, S. M. 1979. A functional analysis of the primate masticatory system and the origin of the anthropoid post-orbital septum. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 50:1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cartmill, M. 1980. Morphology, function, and evolution of the anthropoid postorbital septum. In: R. L. Ciochon and A. B. Chiarelli (eds.), Evolutionary Biology of the New World Monkeys and Continental Drift, pp. 243–274. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cartmill, M., and Kay, R. F. 1978. Cranio-dental morphology, tarsier affinities, and primate suborders. In: D. G. Chivers and K. A. Joyssey (eds.), Recent Advances in Primatology, Vol. 3, Evolution, pp. 205–213. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  13. Cartmill, M., MacPhee, R. D. E., and Simons, E. L. 1981. Anatomy of the temporal bone in early anthropoids, with remarks on the problem of anthropoid origins. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 56:3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ciochon, R. L., Savage, D. E., Thaw Tint, and Ba Maw. 1985. Anthropoid origins in Asia? New discovery of Amphipithecus from the Eocene of Burma. Science 229:756–759.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conroy, G. C. 1980. Ontogeny, auditory structures, and primate evolution. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 52:443–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conroy, G. C., and Bown, T. M. 1974. Anthropoid origins and differentiation: The Asian question. Yearkb. Phys. Anthropol. 18:1–6.Google Scholar
  17. Court, N. 1993. An enigmatic new mammal from the Eocene of North Africa. J. Vert. Paleontol. 13:267–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Covert, H. H., and Williams, B. A. 1992. The anterior lower dentition of Washakius insignis and adapid-anthropoidean affinities. J. Hum. Evol. 21:463–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cronin, J. E., and Sarich, V. M. 1980. Tupaiid and archonta phylogeny: Ehe macromolecular evidence. In: W. P. Luckett (ed.), Comparative Biology and Evolutionary Relationships of Tree Shrews, pp. 293–312. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dagosto, M. 1985. Ehe distal tibia of primates with special reference to the Omomyidae. Int. J. Primatol. 6:45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Donaghue, M. J., Doyle, J. A., Gauthier, J., Kluge, A. G., and Rowe, T. 1989. The importance of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20:431–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fleagle, J. G., and Kay, R. F. 1987. The phyletic position of the Parapithecidae. J. Hum. Evol. 16:383–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kranzen, J. E. 1987. Ein neuer Primate aus dem Mitteleozän der Grube Messel (Deutschland, S-Hessen). Cour. Forsch. Inst. Senckenberg 91:151–187.Google Scholar
  24. Gardiner, B. G. 1982. Tetrapod classification. Zool.J. Linn. Soc. 74:207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gauthier, J., Kluge, A. G., and Rowe, T. 1988. Amniote phylogeny and the importance of fossils. Ciadistics; 4:105–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gazin, C. E. 1958. A review of the middle and upper Eocene primates of North America. Smitkson. Misc. Coll. 136:1–112.Google Scholar
  27. Gebo, D. E. 1986. Anthropoid origins—the foot evidence. J. Hum. Evol. 15:421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gebo, D. L. 1988. Foot morphology and locomotor adaptation in Eocene primates. Fol. Primatol. 50:3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gebo, D. E., and Rasmussen, D. T. 1985. The earliest fossil pangolin (Pholidota: Manidae) from Africa. J. Mammal. 66:538–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gheerbrant, E. 1990. On the early biogeographical history of the African placentals. Hist. Biol. 4:107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gingerich, P. D. 1975. A new genus of Adapidae (Mammalia: Primates) from the late Eocene of southern France, and its significance for the origin of higher primates. Contrib. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Michigan 24:163–170.Google Scholar
  32. Gingerich, P. D. 1977. Radiation of Eocene Adapidae in Europe. Ceobios. Mem. Spec. 1:165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gingerich, P. D. 1980. Dental and cranial adaptations in Eocene Adapidae. Z. Morphol. Anthropol. 71:135–142.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gingerich, P. D. 1981a. Early Cenozoic Omomyidae and the evolutionary history of the tarsiiform primates. J. Hum. Evol. 10:345–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gingerich, P. D. 1981b. Eocene Adapidae, paleobiogeography, and the origin of South American Platyrrhini. In: R. L. Ciochon and A. B. Chiarelli (eds.), Evolutionary Biology of the New World Monkeys and Continental Drift, pp. 123–138. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Gingerich, P. D. 1984. Primate evolution: Evidence from the fossil record, comparative morphology, and molecular biology. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 27:57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gingerich, P. D. 1986. Early Eocene Cantius torresi-oldest primate of modern aspect from North America. Nature 320:319–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gingerich, P. D., and Schoeninger, M. 1977. The fossil record and primate phylogeny. J. Hum. Evol. 6:483–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gingerich, P. D., Dashzeveg, D., and Russell, D. E. 1991. Dentition and systematic relationships of Altanius orlovi (Mammalia, Primates) from the early Eocene of Mongolia. Ceobios 24(5):637–646.Google Scholar
  40. Godinot, M. 1988. Les primates adapidés de Bouxwiller (Eocène Moyen, Alsace) et leur apport à la compréhension de la faune de Messel et à révolution des Anchomomyini. Cour. Forsch. Inst. Senckenberg 107:383–407.Google Scholar
  41. Godinot, M., and Mahboubi, M. 1992. Earliest known simian primate found in Algeria. Nature 357:324–326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Godinot, M., Crochet, J.-Y., Hartenberger, J.-L., Lange-Badré, B., Russell, D. E., and Sigé, B. 1987. Nouvelles dominées sur les mammifères de Palette (Eocène inférieur, Provence). Munch. Geowiss. Abh. [A] 10:273–288.Google Scholar
  43. Greenfield, L. O. 1983. Recent advances and suggestions for expansion of the field of human origins. Pontif. Akad. Sci. Scr. Var. 50:29–40.Google Scholar
  44. Hartenberger, J.-L., and Marandat, B. 1992. A new genus and species of an early Eocene primate from North Africa. Hum. Evol. 7:9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hedges, S. B., Moberg, K. D., and Maxson, L. R. 1990. Tetrapod phytogeny inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA sequences and a review of the evidence for amniote relationships. Mol. Biol. Evol. 7:606–633.Google Scholar
  46. Hershkovitz, P. 1977. Living New World Monkeys (Platyrrhini), Vol. 1, With an Introduction to the Primates. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  47. Hubrecht, A. A. W. 1896. Die Keimblase von Tarsius, ein Hülfsmittel zur schärferen Definition gewisser Säugetierordnungen. In: Festschrift für C. Gegenbauer II, pp. 147–178. Engelmann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  48. Hubrecht, A. A. W. 1902. Furchung und Keimblattbildung bei Tarsius spectrum. Verh. Kon. Akad. Wetensch. Amsterdam 8(6):1–114.Google Scholar
  49. Hubrecht, A. A. W. 1908. Early ontogenetic phenomena in mammals and their bearing on our interpretation of the phylogeny of the vertebrates. Q. Rev. Microsc. Sci. 53:1–181.Google Scholar
  50. Hubrecht, A. A. W. 1909. Die Säugetierontogenese in ihrer Bedeutung für die Phylogenie der Wirbeltiere. Gustav Fischer, Jena.Google Scholar
  51. Kappelman, J., Simons, E. L., and Swisher, C. C. III. 1992. New age determinations for the Eocene-Oligocene boundary sediments in the Fayum depression, northern Egypt. J. Geol. 100:647–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kay, R. F. 1980. Platyrrhine origins: A reappraisal of the dental evidence. In: R. L. Ciochon, and A. B. Chiarelli (eds.), Evolutionary Biology of the New World Monkeys and Continental Drift, pp. 159–188. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Le Gros Clark, W. E. 1959. The Antecedants of Man: An Introduction to the Evolution of the Primates. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. Lovtrup, S. 1985. On the classification of the taxon Tetrapoda. Syst. Zool. 34:463–470.Google Scholar
  54. Luckett, W. P. 1974. Comparative development and evolution of the placenta in primates. Contrib. Primatol. 3:142–234.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. MacPhee, R. D. E., and Cartmill, M. 1986. Basicranial structures and primate systematics. In: D. R. Swindler and J. Erwin (eds.), Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. I, Systematics, Evolution, and Anatomy, pp. 219–276. Alan R. Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  56. Mai, L. L. 1985. Chromosomes and the taxonomic status of the genus Tarsius: Preliminary results. J. Hum. Evol. 14:229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Marshall, C. R. 1992. Substitution bias, weighted parsimony, and amniote phylogeny as inferred from 18S rRNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:370–373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Marshall, C. R., and Schultze, H.-P. 1992. Relative importance of molecular, neontological and paleontological data in understanding the biology of the vertebrate invasion of land. J. Mol. Evol. 35:93–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Noback, C. R. 1975. The visual system of primates in phylogenetic studies. In: W. P. Luckett and F. S. Szalay (eds.), Phylogeny of the Primates, pp. 199–218. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ostrom, J. H. 1975. On the origin of Archaeopteryx and the ancestry of birds. Coll. Int. C.N.R.S. 218:519–532.Google Scholar
  61. Ostrom, J. H. 1990. Dromaeosauridae. In: D. B. Weishampel, P. Dodson, and H. Osmolska, (eds.), The Dinosaurs, pp. 269–279. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  62. Pickford, M. 1986a. Premiere découverte d’une faune mammalienne terrestre paleogène d’Afrique sub-saharienne. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris [II] 302:1205–1210.Google Scholar
  63. Pickford, M. 1986b. Premiere découverte d’une hyracoide paleogène en Eurasie. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris [II] 303:1251–1254.Google Scholar
  64. Pocock, R. I. 1918. On the external characters of the lemurs and of Tarsius. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1918:19–53.Google Scholar
  65. Pollock, J. I., and Mullin, R. J. 1987. Vitamin C biosynthesis in prosimians: Evidence for the anthropoid affinities of Tarsi us. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 73:65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Poorman, P. A., Cartmill, M., MacPhee, R.D.E., and Moses, M. J. 1985. The G-banded karyotype of Tardus bancanus and its implications lor primate phytogeny. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 66:215.Google Scholar
  67. Rasnnissen, D. T 1986. Anthropoid origins: A possible solution to the Adapidae-Omomyidae paradox. J. Human. Evol. 15:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rasnnissen, D. T. 1990. The phylogenetic position of Mahgarita stevensi: Protoanthropoid or lemuroid? Int. J. Primatol. 11:439–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rasnnissen, D. T., and Simons, E. L. 1988. New specimens of Oligopithecus savagei, early Oligocene primate from the Fayum, Egypt. Fol. Primatol. 51:182–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rasnnissen, D. T., and Simons, E. L. 1992. Paleobiology of the oligopithecines, the world’s earliest known anthropoid primates. Int. J. Primatol. 13:477–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rasnnissen, D. T., Bown, T. M., and Simons, E. L. 1992. The Eocene-Oligocene transition in continental Africa. In: D. R. Prothero and W. A. Berggren (eds.), Eocene-Oligocene Climatic and Biotic Evolution, pp. 548–560. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  72. Rasnnissen, D. T., Shekelle, M., Walsh, S. L., and Riney, B. O. 1994. The dentition of Dyseolemur and comments on the use of the anterior teeth in primate systematics. J. Hum. Evol. (in press).Google Scholar
  73. Rose, K. D., and Bown, T. M. 1991. Additional fossil evidence on the differentiation of the earliest euprimates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:98–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rosenberger, A. L. 1985. In favor of the necrolemur-tarsier hypothesis. Fol. Primatol. 45:179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rosenberger, A. L., and Szalay, F. S. 1980. On the tarsiiform origins of Anthropoidea. In: R. E. Ciochon, and A. B. Chiarelli (eds.), Evolutionary Biology of the New World Monkeys and Continental Drift, pp. 139–157. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rosenberger, A. E., Strasser, E., and Delson, E. 1985. Anterior dentition of Notharctus and the adapid-anthropoid hypothesis. Fol. Primatol. 44:15–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Russell, D. E., and Gingerich, P. D. 1987. Nouveaux primates de l’Éocène du Pakistan. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris [II] 304:209–214.Google Scholar
  78. Sarich, V. M., and Cronin, J. E. 1976. Molecular systematics of the primates. In: M. Goodman and R. E. Tashian (eds.), Molecular Anthropology, pp. 141–170. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Savage, R.J. G. 1978. Carnivora. In: V.J. Maglio and H. B. S. Cooke (eds.), Evolution of African Mammals, pp. 249–267. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  80. Schmid, P. 1981. Comparison of Eocene nonadapids and Tarsius. In: A. B. Chiarelli and R. S. Corruccini (eds.), Primate Evolutionary Biology, pp. 6–13. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schmid, P. 1982. Die systematische Revision der europäischen Microchoeridae Lydekker, 1887 (Omomyiformes. Primates). Juris Druck + Verlag, Zurich.Google Scholar
  82. Sigé, B, Jaeger, J.-J., Sudre, J., and Vianey-Eiaud, M. 1990. Altiatlasius koulchii n.gen.et sp., primate omomyidé du Paléocène supérieur du Maroc, et les origines des Euprimates. Palaeontographica [A] 214:31–56.Google Scholar
  83. Simons, E. E. 1961. Notes on Eocene tarsioids and a revision of some Necrolemurinae. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Geol. 5:45–69.Google Scholar
  84. Simons, E. E. 1974. Notes on early Tertiary prosiinians. In: R. D. Martin, G. A. Doyle, and A. C. Walker (eds.), Prosimian Biology, pp. 415–433. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
  85. Simons, E. L. 1989. Description of two new genera and species of late Eocene Anthropoidea from Egypt. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:9956–9960.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Simons, E. L. 1990. Discovery of the oldest known anthropoidean skull from the Paleogene of Egypt. Science 247:1507–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Simons, E. L., and Rasnnissen, D. T. 1989. Cranial morphology of Aegyptopithecus and Tarsius and the question of the tarsier-anthropoidean clade. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 79:1–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Simons, E. L., and Russell, D. E. 1960. Notes on the cranial anatomy of Necrolemur. Breviora. Mus. Comp. Zoology 127:1–14.Google Scholar
  89. Simons, E. L., Bown, T. M., and Rasmussen, D. T. 1987. Discovery of two additional prosimian primate families (Omomyidae, Lorisidae) in the African Oliogocene. J. Human Evol. 15:431–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sober, E. 1988. Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  91. Spatz, W. B. 1968. Die Bedeutung der Augen für die sagittale Gestaltung des Schädels von Tarsws (Prosimiae, Tarsiifbrmes). Fol. Primatol. 9:22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Starck, D. 1956. Primitiventwicklung und Plazentation der Primaten. In: H. Hofer, A. H. Schultz, and D. Starck (eds.), Primatologia, Vol. 1, pp. 723–886. Basel, Karger.Google Scholar
  93. Stehlin, H. G. 1912. Die Säugetiere des schweizerischen Eozäns. Critischer Catalog der Materialen, part 7, first half. Abh. Schweiz. Pal. Ges. 38:1165–1298.Google Scholar
  94. Stehlin, H. G. 1916. Die Säugetiere des schweizerischen Eozäns. Critischer Catalog der Materialen, part 7, second half. Abh. Schweiz. Pal. Ges. 41:1299–1552.Google Scholar
  95. Szalay, F. S. 1970. Late Eocene Amphipithecus and the origins of catarrhine primates. Nature 227:355–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Szalay, F. S. 1976. Systematics of the Omomyidae (Tarsiiformes, Primates): Taxonomy, phylogeny and adaptations. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 156:157–450.Google Scholar
  97. Szalay, F. S., and Delson, E. 1979. Evolutionary History of the Primates. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  98. Szalay, F. S., Rosenberger, A. L., and Dagosto, M. 1987. Diagnosis and differentiation of the Order Primates. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 30:75–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Tattersall, I. 1973. Cranial anatomy of the Archaeolemurinae (Lemuroidea, Primates). Anthropol. Pap. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 52:1–110.Google Scholar
  100. Thomas, H., Roger, J., Sen, S., and Al-Sulaimani, Z. 1988. Découverte des plus anciens “Anthropoïdes” du continent arabo-africain et d’un primate tarsiiforme dans l’Oligocène du Sultanat d’Oman. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris [II] 306:823–829.Google Scholar
  101. Thomas, H., Roger, J., Sen, S., Bourdillon-de-Grissac, C., and Al-Sulaimani, Z. 1989. Découverte de vertébrés fossiles dans l’Oligocène inférieur du Dhofar (Sultanat d’Oman). Geobios 22:101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Thomas, H., Sen, S., Roger, J., and Al-Sulaimani, Z. 1991. The discovery of Moeripithecus mark-grafi Schlosser (Propliopithecidae, Anthrpooidea, Primates), in the Ashawq Formation (early Oligocene of Dhofar Province, Sultanate of Oman). J. Hum. Evol. 20:33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Tilden, C. D., Holroyd, P. A., and Simons, E. L. 1990. Phyletic affinities of Apterodon (Hyaenodontidae, Creodonta). J. Vert. Paleontol. 10(3)[Suppl]:46A.Google Scholar
  104. Wilson, J. A., and Szalay, F. S. 1976. New adapid primate of European affinities from Texas. Fol. Primatol. 25:294–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wood Jones, F. 1929. Mans Place among the Mammals. Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  106. Wortman, J. L. 1903. Studies of Eocene Mammalia in the Marsh collection, Peabody Museum, Part II, Primates, Art. XLI, Classification of the primates. Am. J. Sci. [Ser 4] 15:399–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wortman, J. L. 1904a. Studies of Eocene Mammalia in the Marsh collection, Peabody Museum, Part II, Primates, Art. II, Suborder Anthropoidea. Am. J. Sci. [Ser. 4] 17:23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wortman, J. L. 1904b. Studies of Eocene Mammalia in the Marsh collection, Peabody Museum, Part II, Primates, Art. XVIII, On the affinities of Omomyinae. Am. J. Sci. [Ser. 4] 17:203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Tab Rasmussen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations