Abstract
Hyland has identified the person × situation debate as a methodological, not a theoretical issue. He has shown that the proposed resolution of this issue, interactionism in any of several forms, is not really a resolution but an overdue statement of the nature of the problem that still remains for psychologists to solve. And he has suggested that a real solution might be found in the directions indicated by control theory. In my opinion, he has identified the crux of the real issue, which is the difference between an old cause-effect paradigm based on a lineal form of analysis and a new paradigm based on what we might call, in the present context, principles of concurrent interactionism. This fundamental difference deserves further discussion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Powers, W.T. (1984). Interactionism and Control Theory. In: Royce, J.R., Mos, L.P. (eds) Annals of Theoretical Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9191-4_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9191-4_30
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9193-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9191-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive