Advertisement

Logic and Psycho-logic of Science

  • Lewis Wolfgang Brandt

Abstract

In my comments I shall follow as closely as possible the structure of Madsen’s chapter on the Hypotheses Quotient in order to facilitate comparison. Since Madsen states that he bases his work on the philosophy of science by Kuhn, I shall do the same in my comments wherever I consider it appropriate. My discussion from the point of view of a logic of science will be followed by considerations from the perspective of a psycho-logic of science. I say a and not the logic of science because there exist various logics of science (cf. Radnitzky, 1968). The reader will see how much Madsen’s and mine overlap.

Keywords

Psychological Theory Creative Science Psychological Reason Bell Telephone Laboratory Empirical Proposition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bell Telephone Laboratories. Short-term visual memory (film). 1962.Google Scholar
  2. Braithwaite, R. B. Explanation. In Encyclopaedia Britannica. Chicago: Benton, 1961.Google Scholar
  3. Brandt, L. W. Some notes on English Freudian terminology. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 1961, 9, 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandt, L. W. Process or structure? Psychoanalytic Review, 1966, 53, 374–378.Google Scholar
  5. Brandt, L. W. Wanted: A representative experiment. Review of Theorie und Experiment in der Psychologie by K. Holzkamp. Contemporary Psychology, 1967, 12, 192–193.Google Scholar
  6. Brandt, L. W. Experiments in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Review, 1974, 62, 95–98.Google Scholar
  7. Brandt, L. W. Psychoanalyse versus psychoanalysis: Traduttore, traditore. Psyche, 1977, 11, 1045–51.Google Scholar
  8. Brandt, L. W. Psicoanalisis no es Psychoanalyse. Cuadernos Psicoanaliticos, 1980, 2, 25–34. (Spanish translation of an invited paper presented under the title “Psychoanalisis is not Psychoanalyse” at the meeting of the Canadian Society for Cultural and Intellectual History at Saskatoon in June, 1979.)Google Scholar
  9. Brandt, L. W. Psychologists caught: A psycho-logic of psychology. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  10. Brandt, L. W. Gedanken über Gedankenlosigkeit einschliesslich “operationaler Definitionen.”—Ein Ritt durch die Wüste. In G. Bittner (Ed.), Personale Psychologie. Festschrift für Ludwig J. Pongratz. Göttingen: C. J. Hogrefe, 1983.Google Scholar
  11. Bridgman, P. W. The logic of modern physics. New York: Macmillan, 1927.Google Scholar
  12. Bridgman, P. W. The way things are. New York: Viking, 1959.Google Scholar
  13. Einstein, A. The meaning of relativity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1923.Google Scholar
  14. Freud, S. (1937) Konstruktionen in der Analyse. In Gesammelte Werke (Vol. 16). London: Imago, 1945.Google Scholar
  15. Hanson, N. R. Perception and discovery. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper, 1969.Google Scholar
  16. Holzkamp, K. Theorie und Experiment in der Psychologic Berlin: de Gruyter, 1964.Google Scholar
  17. Kuhn, T. S. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  18. Kuhn, T. S. Reflections on my critics. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  19. Popper, K. Unended quest. Glasgow: Collins/Fontana, 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lewis Wolfgang Brandt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ReginaReginaCanada

Personalised recommendations