Advertisement

Protected Proteins in Ruminant Nutrition. In Vitro Evaluation of Casein Derivatives

  • Mendel Friedman
  • Glen A. Broderick
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 86)

Abstract

Chemical treatment of proteins in feeds can, by crosslinking protein chains or other chemical effects, decrease their solubility and microbial degradation in the rumen. A need exists to modify proteins systematically under well-defined conditions with inexpensive reagents and to evaluate the treated products nutritionally for possible beneficial effects on wool growth and quality as well as production of meat and milk. As a first step toward this goal we evaluated many derivatives of casein treated at pH 9–10 with various acylating and alkylating agents. Initial tests indicate that all treatments decreased protein digestion by rumen microorganisms. Potentially crosslinking reagents are usually more effective than similar ones that cannot crosslink. A few treatments gave ruminal protection that approached or exceeded that obtained with formaldehyde. This result shows that systematic evaluation of ruminai in vitro digestibility of protein derivatives may disclose new products deserving tests of postruminal digestibility and practical nutritive value.

Keywords

Vortex Formaldehyde Fermentation DMSO Adduct 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asplund, J. M. (1975). The determination and significance of biological values of proteins for ruminants. In “Protein Nutritional Quality of Foods and Feeds,” Part 1, M. Friedman (Editor), Dekker, New York, pp. 37–49.Google Scholar
  2. Barry, T. N. (1972). The effect of feeding formaldehyde treated casein to sheep on nitrogen retention and wool growth. New Zealand J. Agr. Res., 15, 107–116.Google Scholar
  3. Beckwith, A. C., Paulis, J. W. and Wall, J. S. (1975). Direct estimation of lysine in corn meals by the ninhydrin color reaction. J. Ag. Food Chem.23, 194–196.Google Scholar
  4. Broderick, G. A. (1976). Modification of an in vitro procedure for estimating ruminai protein by-pass. Fed.Proc. 35, 442 (Abstract).Google Scholar
  5. Broderick, G. A. (1977). Effect of processing on protein utilization by ruminants. This volume.Google Scholar
  6. Broderick, G. A. (1975). Factors affecting ruminant responses to protected amino acids and proteins. In “Protein Nutritional Quality of Foods and Feeds,” Part 2, M. Friedman (Editor), Dekker, New York, pp. 211–259 and references cited there.Google Scholar
  7. Clark,T.H. (1975). Nitrogen metabolism in ruminants: protein solubility and rumen bypass of protein and amino acids. In “Protein Nutritional Quality of Foods and Feeds,” Part 2, M. Friedman (Editor), Dekker, New York, pp. 261–304 and references cited there.Google Scholar
  8. Dinius, D. A., Lyon, C. K. and Walker, H. G., Jr. (1974). In vitro evaluations of protein and protein-safflower oil complexes treated with formaldehyde. J.Anim. Sci., 38, 467–474.Google Scholar
  9. Faichney, G. J. (1974). The effect of formaldehyde treatment of a casein supplement on urea excretion and on digesta composition in sheep. Aust. J.Agr. Res., 25, 599–612.Google Scholar
  10. Friedman, M. and Williams, L. D. (1974). Stoichimetry of formation of Ruhemann’s purple in the ninhydrin reaction. Bioorganic Chem, 3, 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Friedman, M. and Williams, L. D. (1973). The reaction of ninhydrin with keratin proteins. Anal. Biochem.54, 333–345.Google Scholar
  12. Hemsley, J. A., Reis, P. J. and Downes, A. M. (1973). Influence of various formaldehyde treatments on the nutritional value of casein for wool growth. Aust. J. Biol. Sci., 26, 961–972.Google Scholar
  13. McCullough, H. (1967). The determination of ammonia in whole blood by a direct colorimetric method. Clin. Chim. Acta 17, 297–304.Google Scholar
  14. McDougall, E. I. (1948). Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep’s saliva. Biochem.T., 43, 99–109.Google Scholar
  15. Miller, E. L. (1973). Evaluation of foods as sources of nitrogen and amino acids. Proc. Nutr. Soc., 32, 79–84.Google Scholar
  16. Munro, H. N. and Fleck, A. (1969). Analysis of tissues andGoogle Scholar
  17. body fluids for nitrogenous constituents. In “Mammalian Protein Metabolism,” Vol. III, H. N. Munro (Editor), Academic Press, pp. 423–525.Google Scholar
  18. Phillipson, A. T. (1972). The protection of dietary components from rumen fermentations. Proc. Nutr Soc., 31, 159–164.Google Scholar
  19. Streeter, C. L., Little, C. O. and Mitchell, G. E., Jr. (1970). Automated analysis of NH3 in ruminai fluid. J. Animal Sci., 31, 255 (Abstract).Google Scholar
  20. Technicon. (1968). A new air-stable ninhydrin reagent for use with standard Technicon amino acid analyzers. Technicon Research Bulletin No. 20.Google Scholar
  21. Wright, P. L. (1971). Body weight gain and wool growth response to formaldehyde treated casein and sulfur amino acids. J. Animal Sci., 33, 137–141.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mendel Friedman
    • 1
  • Glen A. Broderick
    • 2
  1. 1.Western Regional Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research ServiceU.S. Department of AgricultureBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Animal ScienceTexas A&M University and Texas Agricultural Experiment StationCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations