Advertisement

Characterizing and Modeling Human Arm Movements: Insights into Motor Organization

  • Tamar Flash
  • Irina Gurevich
  • Ealan Henis

Abstract

The generation of human goal-directed multi-joint arm movements requires the central nervous system (CNS) to deal with complicated motion planning and control problems. These problems include the selection and planning of specific motions for the hand among the large number of possible ones, the transformation of the desired hand trajectory plans into appropriate joint rotations, and the generation of appropriate muscle forces and joint torques in order to execute the desired motion plans. In this article we will review several recent behavioral and modeling studies of human arm trajectory formation. These studies were aimed at characterizing and modeling human multi-joint arm movements and at investigating how the motor system copes with these complicated motion planning and control problems. The topics to be discussed will include hand trajectory planning during reaching and drawing movements, arm trajectory modification in response to unexpected changes in target location and motor adaptation to unexpected force perturbations introduced by means of external elastic loads. Then, the implications of our findings with respect to motor organization and possible neural correlates for the motion planning and motor execution and adaptation schemes suggested here will be discussed.

Keywords

Joint Torque Hand Path Hand Trajectory Equilibrium Trajectory Drawing Movement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abend. W., Bizzi, E., and Morasso, P.. 1982, Human arm trajectory formation. Brain 105: 331–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander, G. E., DeLong, M. R., and Crutcher, M. D., 1992. Do cortical and basal ganglia motor areas use “motor programs” to control movement. Behavioral Brain Sci. 15: 644–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aslin, R. N., and Shea, S. L., 1987, The amplitude and angle of saccades to double-step target displacements, Vision Res. 27: 1925–1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bizzi, E., Hogan, N., Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A., and Giszter. S., 1992, Does the nervous system use equilibrium point control to guide single and multiple-joint movements, Behavioral Brain Sci. 15: 603–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edelman, S., and Flash, T., 1987, A model of handwriting, Biol. Cybern. 57: 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feldman, A. G., 1986, Once more on the equilibrium-point hypothesis (7, model) for motor control, J. Motor Behavior 18: 17–54.Google Scholar
  7. Flash, T., and Hogan, N., 1985, The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model, J. Neurosci. 7: 1688–1703.Google Scholar
  8. Flash T., 1987, The control of hand equilibrium trajectories in multi-joint arm movements, Biol. Cvbern. 57: 257–274.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Flash, T., 1990, The organization of human arm trajectory control, in Multiple Muscle Systems: Biomechanics and Movement Organization (Winters. J. & Woo. S.. eds. ), Springer-Verlag. pp. 282–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flash, T., and Mussa-Ivaldi, F., 1990, Human arm stiffness characteristics during the maintenance of posture, Exp. Brain Res., 82: 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flash, T., and Henis, E.. 1991, Arm trajectory modification during reaching towards visual targets, J. Cognitive Neurosci. 3: 220–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Flash, T.. and Gurevich, I., 1992, Human motor adaptation to external loads. Ann. Int. Cont. of the IEEE Eng. in Med.. and Biol. Soc. 13:885–886Google Scholar
  13. Flash, T., and Hogan, N., 1995, Optimization principles in motor control, in The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks (Arbib, M. A., ed.), MIT Press, Cambridge. MA. pp. 682–685.Google Scholar
  14. Flash, T. and Gurevich, I., 1995, Arm postural stiffness field variations with external load. Submitted.Google Scholar
  15. Georgopoulos, P.. Ashe, J.. Smyrnis, N., and Taira. M., 1992, The motor cortex and the coding of force, Science, 1692–1695.Google Scholar
  16. Gurevich, I., 1993, Learning and adaptation in human multi-joint motor behavior. Ph. D. Thesis, Dept. of Applied Math., and Computer Science, Weizmann Inst. of Science. Israel.Google Scholar
  17. Gurevich, I., and Flash, T., 1995a, Motor adaptation to external loads in planar two-joint arm movement, part 1. Submitted.Google Scholar
  18. Gurevich, I., and Flash, T., 1995b, Motor adaptation to external loads in planar two-joint arm movement, part 2. Submitted.Google Scholar
  19. Hen s, E., and Flash, T., 1995. Mechanisms underlying the generation of averaged modified trajectories, Biol. Cybern. 72: 407–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoff, B., and Arbib, M. A., 1993, Models of trajectory formation and temporal interaction of reach and grasp, J. Motor Behavior 25: 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hogan, N., 1984, An organizing principle for a class of voluntary movements, J Neurosci. 4: 2745–2754.Google Scholar
  22. Hogan, N., 1985, The mechanics of multi-joint posture and movement, Biol. Cybern. 52: 315–331.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hollerbach, J. M., 1982, Computers, brains and the control of movement, Trends in Neurosci. 5: 189–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hollerbach, J. M., and Flash, T., 1982, Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement. Biol. Cybern. 44: 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kalaska. J. F., Cohen. D. A., Prud’homme, M., and Hyde, M. L., 1990, Parietal area 5 neuronal activity encodes movement kinematics, not movement dynamics, Exp. Brain Res. 80: 351–364.Google Scholar
  26. Kalaska, J. F., Kaminiti, R. and Georgopoulos, A. P., 1983, Cortical mechanisms related to the direction of two-dimensional arm movements: relations in parietal area 5 and comparison with motor cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 51: 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lacquaniti, F., 1989, Central representations of human limb movement as revealed by studies of drawing and handwriting, Trends in Neurosci. 12: 287–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morasso, P., 1981, Spatial control of arm movements, Exp. Brain Res. 42: 223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A., Hogan, N., and Bizzi, E.. 1985, Neural, mechanical and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans, J. Neurosci. 5: 2732–2743.Google Scholar
  30. Shadmehr, R., and Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A., 1994, Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J. Neurosci. 5: 3208–3224.Google Scholar
  31. Schwartz, A. B., 1993, Motor control activity during movement population representation during sinusoid tracing, J. Neurophys.Google Scholar
  32. Uno, Y., Kawato, M., and Suzuki, R., 1989, Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement-minimum torque-change model, Biol. Cybern. 61: 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Viviani, P., and Flash, T., 1995, Minimum-jerk, two-thirds power law and isochrony: converging approaches to the study of movement planning, J. Exp. Psycho!.: Human Perception and Performance 21: 32–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Viviani, P., and Cenzato, M., 1985, Segmentation and coupling in complex movements, J. Exp. P.svcho!.: Human Perception and Performance 13: 62–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wise, S. P., 1993, Monkey motor cortex: movements, muscles, motoneurons and metrics, Trends in Neurosci. 16: 46–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wolpert, D. M., Ghahramani, Z., and Jordan, M. Z., 1993, On the role of extrinsic coordinates in arm trajectory planning: evidence from an adaptation study, Computational Cognitive Science Tech. Report 9308, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  37. Yalov, S., 1991. Computational models of hand trojectory planning in drawing movements. M. Sc Thesis, Dept. of Appl. Math and Computer Sci.. Weizmann Inst. of Science, Israel.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tamar Flash
    • 1
  • Irina Gurevich
    • 2
  • Ealan Henis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer ScienceThe Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael
  2. 2.Department of Industrial Engineering and ManagementBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeer ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations