Advertisement

System Size and Isospin Effects in Central Heavy-Ion Collisions at SIS Energies

  • Fouad Rami
  • FOPI Collaboration

Abstract

Much interest has been devoted, for the last two decades, to the investigation of the bulk properties of hot and dense nuclear matter produced in energetic heavy-ion collisions. Despite the tremendous progress accomplished so far1, the dynamical collision process is not yet sufficiently understood to extract unambiguous information on the fundamental properties of nuclear matter and the underlying equation of state. Further studies both experimentally and theoretically are therefore still needed. In this context, a large systematic study of different symmetric reactions has been achieved recently with the FOPI detector2 at the SIS accelerator of GSI-Darmstadt, where different entrance channel parameters (the size of the system, its isospin and the beam energy) were varied. The production of intermediate mass fragments (IMFs) and the degree of equilibration attained during the collision were among the main aspects of interest. By varying the size of the interacting nuclei, one can explore the influence of phenomena like stopping, compression and decompression on the formation of IMFs, which is expected to be particularly important in central collisions3. A deep understanding of the mechanism of IMF production, the so-called “multifragmentation”, is of special interest as it might be related to the possible occurence of a liquid-gas phase transition in finite nuclear systems. Using, on the other hand, different combinations of equal mass projectile and target nuclei which differ only by their isospin content, one can investigate the degree of mixing of projectile and target nucleons. This offers a very promising method to probe the question of whether or not a global equilibrium is reached during the collision, which is the basic assumption in applying statistical concepts to describe the dissociation of the nuclear system. This issue is also of high interest in a microscopic approach of the collision process as the degree of mixing of projectile and target nucleons is expected to be particularly sensitive to the elementary in-medium interactions4.

Keywords

Light System Central Collision Phase Space Region Target Nucleon Invariant Cross Section 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    See, for example, Proceedings of the ”International Research Workshop on Heavy-Ion Physics at Low, Intermediate and Relativistic Energies using 4πr Detectors” Poina-Brasov, Romania, World Scientific Publishing Co., 1997, edited by M. Petrovici, A. Sandulescu, D. Pelte, H. Stöcker and J. Randrup.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Gobbi et al., Nucl. Inst. Meth. A 324 (1993) 156.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S.C. Jeong et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 3468.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Bass, et al., GSI annual report 1994, p.66.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Reisdorf et al., Nucl. Phys. A612 (1997) 493.ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Aichelin, Phys. Rep. 202 (1991) 233.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. de Schauenburg, Thesis, Strasbourg, France (1998) and to be published.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Hartnack et al., submitted to Z. Phys.A.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Kuhn et al., Phys. Rev. C48 (1993) 1232.ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Schüttauf et al., Nucl.Phys. A607 (1996) 457.ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Trautmann, these proceedings.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Crochet et al., Nucl. Phys. A755 (1997) 755.ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    F. Rami for the FOPI Collaboration, in the same Proceedings as in reference 1, p. 160.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. Elattari et al., Nucl.Phys. A592 (1995) 385.ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. Neubert et al. for the FOPI Collaboration, in the same Proceedings as in reference 1, p. 176.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G.S. Wang et al., GSI annual report 1996, p.50.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y. Leifels et al., GSI annual report 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fouad Rami
    • 1
  • FOPI Collaboration
  1. 1.Institut de Recherches Subatomiques, IN2P3-CNRSUniversité Louis PasteurStrasbourg Cedex 2France

Personalised recommendations