Advertisement

Isospin Equilibration in Reactions of 40Ca, 40Ar with 58Fe, 58Ni At E/A = 33, 45 MeV

  • S. J. Yennello
  • H. Johnston
  • D. J. Rowland
  • F. Gimeno-Nogues
  • T. White
  • B. Hurst
  • D. O’Kelly
  • Y.-W Lui
  • E. Ramakrishnan
  • S. Ferro
  • S. Vasal
  • J. Winger
  • Bao-An Li

Abstract

In the field of heavy-ion reactions there is much discussion occurring about the nature of dissassembly of excited nuclear matter e.g.[1]. At one extreme the system is modeled as a simultaneous break up. While at the other extreme the system is portrayed as disassembling through a series of virtualy independent binary breakups. Additionally there are discussion of spinodal decompositions, expanision — either before or after breakup, and liquid gas phase transitions[2]. Many of the above decay models only treat the disassembly of nuclear matter — decoupled from any effects of how the system was formed. In all of these discussions of disassembly we must be careful that the fragmentation timescale does not become so short that the underlying assumption of statistical equilibrium independent of entrance channel is violated.

Keywords

Entrance Channel Projectile Mass Neutron Ball Cyclotron Institute Relative Timescale 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L.G. Moretto and G.J. Wozniak, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. ed J.D. Jackson 379 (1993).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    see other chapters this volumeGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Gauge et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3705 (1993).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.R. Bowman et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3534 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    T.M. Hamilton et.al., preprint INC-40714-103 (1995).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.J. Charity et. al., Phys. Lett. B 323, 113 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Pouliot et. al. Phys Rev C 43, 735 (1991); B.A. Harmon et. al., Phys. Lett. B 235, 234 (1990).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Galin et al., Z. Phys. A278, 347 (1976).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. J. Yennello et al., Phys. Lett. B321, 15 (1994).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. White et al., Texas AandM University Cyclotron Institute Progress in Research (1994).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. Schmitt et al., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A354, 487 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. A. Li and S. J. Yennello, Phys. Lett. B 52, 1 (1995).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. J. Yennello
    • 1
  • H. Johnston
    • 1
  • D. J. Rowland
    • 1
  • F. Gimeno-Nogues
    • 1
  • T. White
    • 1
  • B. Hurst
    • 1
  • D. O’Kelly
    • 1
  • Y.-W Lui
    • 1
  • E. Ramakrishnan
    • 1
  • S. Ferro
    • 1
  • S. Vasal
    • 1
  • J. Winger
    • 2
  • Bao-An Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Cyclotron Institute TexasA&M University College StationUSA
  2. 2.Department of physics and AstronomyMississippi State UniversityMississippi StateUSA

Personalised recommendations