Advertisement

Excitation Functions of Compression and Collective Flow in Central Au+Au Reactions from Bevalac/Sis to AGS

  • Bao-An Li
  • C. M. Ko

Abstract

Experiments at Brookhaven’s AGS have already revealed much interesting new physics during the last few years[1, 2, 3]. In the next few years several important experiments will be carried out at AGS to further study the properties of hot and dense hadronic matter, and to search for the signals for chiral symmetry restoration and/or Quark-Gluon-Plasma (QGP) formation. Among the proposed experiments, systematic studies of Au+Au reactions at several beam momenta between 2 and 12 GeV/c will be carried out by the E895 and E866 collaborations. These experiments are interesting and important as it has been predicted based on hydrodynamical models that the QGP phase transition may occur in heavy-ion collisions at energies between E lab /A= 2– GeV[4, 5, 6]Since one of the necessary conditions for forming the QGP is to form a sufficient large volume of hadronic matter in which the energy density is higher than the QGP critical density, we shall therefore first study the excitation function of compression. Furthermore, since compression will result in the collective flow in the expansion phase of the reaction, we shall also study the excitation functions of the transverse and radial flow.

Keywords

Excitation Function Radial Flow Beam Momentum Relativistic Hydrodynamic Chiral Symmetry Restoration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Proceedings of Heavy Ion Physics at the AGS, HIPAGS’93, 13–15, Jan., 1993, Eds. G.S.F. Stephans, S.G. Steadman, and W.L. KehoeGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Quark Matter 93, Nucl. Phys. A566, lc (1994).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Quark Matter 95, Nucl. Phys. A590, lc (1995).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.H. Rischke et al., J. Phys. G14, 191, (1988); Phys. Rev. D41, 111 (1990).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    N.K. Glendenning, Nucl. Phys. A512, 737 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Gyulassy, Nucl. Phys. A590, 431c (1995).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B.A. Li and C.M. Ko, Phys. Rev. C52, 2037 (1995).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    B.A. Li and C.M. Ko, Phys. Rev. C53, R22 (1996).ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    B.A. Li and C.M. Ko, Nucl. Phys. A (1996) in press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G.F. Bertsch and S. Das Gupta, Phys. Rep., 160, 189 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B.A. Li and W. Bauer, Phys. Lett. B254, 335 (1991); Phys. Rev. C44, 450 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B.A. Li, W. Bauer and G.F. Bertsch, Phys. Rev. C44, 2095 (1991).ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B.A. Li, Nucl. Phys. A570, 797 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C.Y. Wong, Intr. to High Energy Heavy-Ion Collisions, ( World Scientific, Singapore ), 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.I. Kapusta, A. P. Vischer and R. Venugopalan, Phys. Rev. C51, 901 (1995).ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A.H. Taub, Phys. Rev. 74, 328 (1948).MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R.B. Clare and D. Strottman, Phys. Rep., 141, 177 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    A.A. Amsden, F.H. Harlow and J.R. Nix, Phys. Rev. C15, 2059 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. Danielewicz, Phys. Rev. C51, 716 (1995).ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. Danielewicz and G. Odyniec, Phys. Lett. B157, 146 (1985).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M.D. Partlan et al. (EOS collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2100 (1995); M. A. Lisa et al. (EOS collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2662 (1995).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bao-An Li
    • 1
  • C. M. Ko
    • 1
  1. 1.Cyclotron Institute and Department of PhysicsTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations