Skip to main content

Converting Truss Interlandmark Distances to Cartesian Coordinates

  • Chapter
Advances in Morphometrics

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NSSA,volume 284))

Abstract

Coordinate-based landmark data are required to use many of the recent advances in morphometrics, although interlandmark distance measurements were used extensively in the past. In many cases the latter are still being used in morphometric research. The conversion of distance data to coordinate data is not straightforward because insufficient measurement redundancy among landmarks and measurement error obscures the possibility of direct geometric reconstruction. Iterative multivariate methods and redundant measurements, such as the truss protocol, allow for a reasonably accurate conversion of interlandmark distance data into coordinate landmark data. We examine two multidimensional scaling methods for making this conversion. One is based on the nonmetric method found in the statistical package, NTSYS-pc, and the other is a simplified weighted least squares method tailored for this type of conversion. The latter method is amenable to heuristic modification and found to be more accurate than the former, although the NTSYS-pc based method may be more convenient for some users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Becerra, J. M., E. Bello, and A. García-Valdecasas. 1993. Building your own machine image system for morphometric analysis: a user point of view. In: L. F. Marcus, E. Bello, and A. García-Valdecasas (eds.), Contributions to morphometrics. Monografias del Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales 8, Madrid. Pages 65–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookstein, F. L. 1989. Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. I. E.E.E. Transactions on pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 11: 567–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookstein, F. L. 1991. Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookstein, F. L., B. Grayson, C. B. Cutting, H. C. Kim, and J. G. Mc Carthy. 1991. Landmarks in three dimensions: reconstruction from cephalograms versus direct observation. American Journal of Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 100 (2): 133–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bookstein, F. L., B. Chemoff, R. L. Elder, J. M. Humphries, Jr., G. R. Smith, and R. E. Strauss, (eds.), 1985. Morphometrics in evolutionary biology: The geometry of size and shape change, with examples from fishes. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Special Publication 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, M.L. 1983. Multidimensional Scaling. John Wiley and Sons: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, C. 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B 53: 285–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. 1964a. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika. 29: 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruskal, J. B. 1964b. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika. 29: 28–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lele, S. and J. T. Richtsmeier 1992. On comparing biological shapes: detection of influential landmarks. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 87: 49–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F. J. 1993. NTSYS-pc, Version 1. 8. Exeter Publishing: Setauket, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf, F. J. and J. W. Archie. 1978. Least-squares mapping using interpoint distances. Ecology. 59: 26–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, V. L. 1993. On three-dimensional morphometrics, and on the identification of landmark points. In: L. F. Marcus, E. Bello, and A. García-Valdecasas, (eds.), Contributions to morphometrics. Monografias del Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales 8, Madrid. Pages 41–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS for Personal Computers, Release 6.03. 1988. SAS Institute: Cary, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, R. E., and F. L. Bookstein 1982. The truss: body form reconstruction in morphometrics. Systematic Zoology 31 (2): 113–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carpenter, K.E., Sommer, H.J., Marcus, L.F. (1996). Converting Truss Interlandmark Distances to Cartesian Coordinates. In: Marcus, L.F., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G.J.P., Slice, D.E. (eds) Advances in Morphometrics. NATO ASI Series, vol 284. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9083-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9083-2_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9085-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9083-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics