Advertisement

An Idiosyncratic History of Early Morphometrics

  • Richard A. Reyment
Chapter
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 284)

Abstract

The desire to depict shape must be as old as cultivated thought itself. Figures on ancient Egyptian monuments provide early evidence of this wish. More widely known are the designs of Dürer, the fifteenth century German artist, who invented a system of mapping caricatures of faces. Even other artists have used this technique to vary physiognomies in mass scenes, using basically few faces as a starting point.

Keywords

Painted Turtle Algebraic Treatment Equiangular Spiral Principal Component Solution Fundamental Differential Equation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dürer, A. 1525. Underweysung der Messung mit dem Zirckel un Richtscheyt, in Linien Ebnen und ganzen Corporen. Nuremberg.Google Scholar
  2. Girling, A. J. 1993. Shape analysis for the anisotropic corpuscle problem. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B, 55: 675–686.Google Scholar
  3. Hopkins, J. W. 1966. Some considerations in multivariate allometry. Biometrics, 22: 747–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hotelling, H. 1931. The generalization of Student’s ratio. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 2: 360–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Huxley, J. S. 1932. Problems of relative growth. Methuen: London.Google Scholar
  6. Jolicoeur, J. 1963. The degree of generality of robustness in Martes americana. Growth 27: 1–27.Google Scholar
  7. Jolicoeur, J. and Mosimann, J. E. 1960. Size and shape variation in the painted turtle, a principal component analysis. Growth 24: 339–354.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mardia, K. V., Kent, J. T. and Bibby, J. M. 1979. Multivariate analysis. Academic Press: New York.Google Scholar
  9. Panofsky, E. 1945. Albrecht Dürer. Princeton University Press: Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  10. Pearce, S. C. 1965. Biological statistics, an introduction. McGraw-Hill: New York.Google Scholar
  11. Quenouille, M. H. 1952. Associated measurements. Butterworths: London.Google Scholar
  12. Rao, C. R. 1964. The use and interpretation of principal components in applied Mathematics in the archaeological and historical Sciences. Edinburgh University research. Sankhya 26: 329–358.Google Scholar
  13. Rao, C. R. 1971. Taxonomy in anthropology. In F. R. Hodson,. F. R. Kendall, and P. Tautu, (eds.), Mathematics in the archaeological and historical sciences. Edinburgh University Press: Edinburgh, U. K.Google Scholar
  14. Sprent, P. 1968. Linear relationships in growth and size studies. Biometrics 24: 39–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Teissier, G. 1938. Un essai d’analyse factorielle. Les variants sexuels de Maia squinada. Biotypologie 7: 73–96.Google Scholar
  16. Thompson, D. W. 1917. On growth and form. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard A. Reyment
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Earth Sciences Department of Historical Geology and PaleontologyUniversity of UppsalaUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations