Fatigue-Induced Electrical Degradation of Composite High-Purity/High-Strength Aluminum Rings at 4 K

  • S. L. Bray
  • J. W. Eking
  • M. J. Nilles
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering book series (ACRE, volume 44)


One design scenario for the Anchorage Municipal Light & Power superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) system uses Al to thermally stabilize and structurally support the magnet. Composite Al rings were fabricated from high-purity (99.995%) Al and high-strength Al alloy (6061-T6) to simulate the mechanical and electrical characteristics of the stabilizer during fatigue tests in liquid He. To simulate the magnet operating conditions, as the coil is periodically charged and discharged, one test was conducted where a composite ring was subjected to fatigue at 4 K, with the peak hoop stress held constant during the test and the ring’s electrical resistance periodically measured at 0 and 4 T. For comparison, a second fatigue test was conducted on a similar ring where peak hoop strain was held constant. In both tests the initial peak strain was 0.21%. In the constant-strain test, the increase in resistivity at 4 T after 4000 fatigue cycles was 40% greater than for the constant-stress test, indicating a significant strengthening of the composite through work-hardening of the high-purity Al. These results, applied to the design of Al-stabilized magnets, allow a substantial reduction in the required quantity of high-purity-Al stabilizer and in the magnet’s cost.


Fatigue Cycle Peak Strain Test Ring Design Scenario Hoop Strain 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. F. Ribeiro, R. Kunz, and S. Kral, Superconducting magnetic energy storage for integrated power quality solutions, Proceedings of the Power Quality ‘85 Conference, Bremen, Germany (1995).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. F. Kral, V. Karasik, et al., Alaska SMES: form and function for the world’s largest magnet, to be published in: “Advances in Cryogenic Engineering,” Plenum Press, New York (1998), vol. 43.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    See, for example, J. W. Ekin, Superconductors, in: “Materials at Low Temperatures,” R. P. Reed and A. F. Clark, ed., American Society for Metals, Metals Park (1983), p. 465.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. T. Gehan and K. T. Hartwig, Total plastic strain and electrical resistivity in high purity aluminum cyclically strained at 4.2 K, in: “Advances in Cryogenic Engineering,” Plenum Press, New York (1990), vol. 36, p. 717.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. L. Bray, J. W. Ekin, D. J. Waltman, and M. J. Superczynski, Quench energy and fatigue degradation properties of Cu-and Al/Cu-stabilized Nb-Ti epoxy-impregnated superconductor coils, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., 5: 222 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. W. Ekin, R. E. Schramm, and M. J. Superczynski, Training of epoxy-impregnated superconductor windings, in: “Advances in Cryogenic Engineering,” Plenum Press, New York (1980), vol. 26, p. 677.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. W. Ekin, Current transfer in multifilamentary superconductors. I. theory, J. Appi. Phys., 49: 3406 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. R. Fickett, Magnetoresistance of very pure polycrystalline aluminum, Phys. Rev. B, 3: 1941 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. L. Bray
    • 1
  • J. W. Eking
    • 1
  • M. J. Nilles
    • 2
  1. 1.National Institute of Standards and TechnologyBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Babcock & WilcoxLynchburgUSA

Personalised recommendations