Pop-in Phenomena in an Al-Li Alloy

  • A. Bussiba
  • H. Alush
  • M. Kupiec
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering book series (ACRE, volume 44)


Pop-in (PI) cracking was studied as a function of temperature, test velocity and orientation in Weldalite-049 Al-Li alloy. It was found that local crack instability is characterized by a cumulative damage mechanism as reflected by AE activity. In addition, PI behavior in fracture is controlled by mechanical and microstructural factors. First, the mechanical effect is expressed by the increase of PI crack velocity as the excess local stored elastic energy increases (due to consecutive PI, and also by increasing test speed), while in the case of extreme conditions resulting from warm-prestressing or cold-prestressing, PI events are almost eliminated. Second, a microstructural effect is reflected by the behavior of various crack extension orientations; PI is diminished in S-T orientation (crack delamination), due to a lack of barriers for crack arrest. For two other orientations, T-S (crack arrester) and L-T (crack divider), blunting accompanied by a concurrent crack delamination process, causes crack arrest even at high test velocities at low temperatures. Thus, PI phenomena reflect in some way the dynamic toughness and crack arrest properties of materials.


Fracture Toughness Acoustic Emission Crack Extension Crack Arrest Acoustic Emission Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    C. J. Beevers et al., Metal Science, 9: 119 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. Yongqing et al., Int. J. of Fracture, 71: R71 – R76 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Thulow and W. Burget, Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct., 13: 327 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    U.P. Singh and S. Banerjee, Acta Metall. Mater., 39: 1073 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Doglione, E. Ilia and D. Firrao, Scripta Metall., 27: 987 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Bussiba and Y. Katz, in: “Localized Damage 1V-Computer-Aided Assessment and Control”, H. Nisitani, M. H. Aliabadi, S-I. Nishida and D. J. Cartwright eds.,CMP Publications, Southampton UK.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.R. Pickens, et al., in: “Aluminum-Lithium Alloys V”, T.H. Sanders, Jr. and E.A. Starke, Jr., eds., MCE, Birmingham, UK (1987), p. 1397.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Bussiba, M. Kupiec and Y. Katz, in: “Advances in Cryogenic Engineering”, Vol. 42, L.T. Summers, ed., Plenum Press, New York (1996), p. 285.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C.P. Blankenship, Jr. and E.A. Starke, Jr., Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struc., 14: 103 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    ASTM E-399–90; Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, (1993).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Furukawa, Y. Miura and M. Nemoto, Journal de Physique, 48: C3 ” 557 (1987).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F.J. Zerilli and R.W. Armstrong, Acta Metall. Mater., 40: 1803 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. Eswara Prasad et al., Fatigue Fract. Engng. Mater. Struct., 17: 441 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. Smith, in: “Development in Fracture Mechanics-2”, G.G. Chell ed., ASP Pubs., London (1981), p. 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Bussiba
    • 1
  • H. Alush
    • 1
  • M. Kupiec
    • 1
  1. 1.NRCN-NegevBeer-ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations