Hall Current in Aluminum-Copper Composite

  • H. Kaneko
Part of the An International Cryogenic Materials Conference Publication book series (ACRE, volume 40)


Enhancement of magnetoresistance due to a Hall current, which is induced by a nonuniform Hall effect across an interface between different metals, is discussed. Such a current causes an additional resistive loss, and the inter-metallic magnetoresistance should be observed. Since the polarity of the Hall effect in copper is opposite to that in aluminum, the effect might be conspicuous in an aluminum-copper composite. Reduction of the Hall current is essentially important for application of a highly conductive material to stabilizers of a superconducting cable. A method for the reduction is evaluated in relation to the surface resistance of an aluminum-copper interface in the stabilizer. Since the required surface resistance of the interface is considerably high, extra heat generation on current transfer is a great obstacle. A slit in the insulator layer is effective in reducing the contact resistance without releasing a large loop for the Hall current. There is a possible design to retain 90% conductivity of the original aluminum, even when a thick conductive sheath is used.


Heat Generation Hall Effect Surface Resistance Hall Current Current Transfer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    F. R. Fickett, Aluminum 1. A review of resistive mechanisms in aluminum, Cryogenics 11 (1971) 349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. Iiyoshi, M. Fujiwara, O. Motojima, N. Ohyabu and K. Yamazaki, Design study for the Large Helical Device, Fusion Tech. 17 (1990)169–187.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    O. Motojima, et. al., Engineering design study of superconducting Large Helical Device, in Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion Research 1990, Vol. 3 ( IAEA, Vienna, 1991 ) 513–523.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Yamamoto, O. Motojima, T. Satow, T. Mito and LHD Design Group, Superconducting coil design for Large Helical Device, IEEE trans. Magnetics 27 (1991) 2220–2223.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    T. Mito, J. Yamamoto, K. Takahata, N. Yanagi and O. Motojima, Stability tests on R and D superconductors for the Large Helical Device, Cryogenics 31 (1991) 634–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    P. W. Eckels, N. C. Iyer, A. Patterson, A. T. Male, J. H. Parker Jr. and J. W. Coltman, Magneto-resistance: the Hall effect in composite aluminium cryoconductors, Cryogenics 29 (1989) 748–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    P. W. Eckels and J. H. Parker Jr., Magnetoresistance in composite conductors, Adv. Cryog. Eng. (Materials) 36 (1990) 655–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    H. Kaneko and N. Yanagi, Enhancement of magnetoresistance due to Hall current in aluminium-copper composite, Cryogenics 32 (1992) 1114–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    N.Yanagi, T. Mito, K. Takahata, M. Sakamoto, A. Nishimura, S. Yamada, S. Imagawa, H. Kaneko, J. Yamamoto, O. Motojima, Experimental observation of anomalous magnetoresistivity in 10–20 kA class aluminum stabilized superconductors, this conference, CX-5.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    H. Kaneko, Insulation of highly conductive metal in composite stabilizer for reduction of Hall current across surface, Cryogenics (to be published).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. Imagawa, N. Yanagi, T. Mito, T. Satow, J. Yamamoto, O. Motojima and the LHD group, Reduction of anomalous resistivity in an aluminium stabilized superconductor for the Large Helical Device, this conference, CX-6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Kaneko
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute for Fusion ScienceFuro-cho, Chikusa-ku, NagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations