Advertisement

Pulse Tube Refrigerator Based on Fluid Inertia

  • K. V. Ravikumar
  • Y. Matsubara
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering book series (ACRE, volume 43)

Abstract

Refrigeration effect in pulse tube coolers can be explained/understood in terms of phase shift between oscillations of pressure and displacement of gas particle at the cold end of the pulse tube. There are different mechanisms (means) to create the phase shift. Surface heat pumping and resistance to fluid flow in orifice are two examples of commonly used mechanisms to create needed phase shifts in basic pulse tube cooler and orifice pulse tube cooler respectively. At high frequency operation there is yet another mechanism possible due to fluid inertia that could effectively be used to create favorable phase shift. Results of experimental investigations of the new mechanism are presented. It is found in the case double inlet pulse tube cooler that effectiveness of second (double) inlet progressively diminished as operating frequency increased. It is also observed as the operating frequency increased that fluid inertia based phase shifter achieved lower temperatures than simple orifice and double inlet configurations in a certain frequency range.

Keywords

Pressure Ratio Pulse Tube Refrigeration Temperature Fluid Inertia Refrigeration Capacity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P.J. Storch and R. Radebaugh, Development and Experimental Test of an Analytical Model of the Orifice Pulse Tube Refrigerator, Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Vol. 33, p: 851 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    W.E. Gifford and R.C. Longsworth, Surface Heat Pumping, Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Vol. 11, p: 171 (1965)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Tominaga, Phase Controls for Pulse-Tube Refrigerator of the Third Generation, Cryogenic Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 2, p: 146 (1992) (in Japanese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S.W. Zhu, S.L. Zhou, N. Yoshimura and Y. Matsubara, Phase Shift Effect of the Long Neck Tube for the Pulse Tube Refrigerator, in Proceedings of the 9 International Cryocooler Conference, held June 1996, in New Hampshire (to be published)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.L. Gardner and G.W. Swift, Use of Inertance in Orifice Pulse Tube Refrigerators, (submitted to Cryogenics)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K.M. Godshalk, C. Jin, Y.K. Kwong, E.L. Hershberg, G.W. Shift and R. Radebaugh, Characterization of 350Hz Thermoacoustic Driven Orifice Pulse Tube Refrigerator with Measurements of the Phase of Mass Flow and Pressure, Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Vol. 41B, p: 1411 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Kanao, N. Watanabe and Y. Kanazawa, A Miniature Pulse Tube Refrigerator for temperature Below 100K, Cryogenics, Vol. 34, ICEC Supplement, p:167 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Haruyama and H. Inoue, Cooling Characyeristics of a Modified Miniature Pulse Tube Refrigerator, Advances in Cryogenic Engineering, Vol. 41B, p: 1427 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Ravex, P. Rolland and J. Liang, Experimental Study and Modelisation of a Pulse Tube Refrigerator, Cryogenics, Vol. 32, ICEC Supplement, p:9 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. V. Ravikumar
    • 1
  • Y. Matsubara
    • 1
  1. 1.Atomic Energy Research InstituteNihon UniversityFunabashi, Chiba, 274Japan

Personalised recommendations