Analyzing Magnetic Refrigeration Efficiency: A Rotary AMR — Reverse Brayton Case Study

  • J. L. Hall
  • J. A. Barclay
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering book series (ACRE, volume 43)


Recent advances in magnetic refrigerants, regenerative magnetic cycle theory and conduction-cooled superconducting magnet systems have improved the outlook for developing practical, cost-effective magnetic refrigerators. This has prompted an effort to provide an updated estimate of achievable magnetic refrigerator thermodynamic performance as compared to conventional gas-cycle devices. Calculations were performed as part of a case study involving one candidate refrigerator from each technology: rotary active magnetic regeneration and reverse-Brayton gas compression. The study shows that the two systems are very analogous, allowing for a fair comparison. For refrigeration at 100 K and heat rejection at 300 K, both are capable of producing second law efficiencies of over 60% given a similar set of optimistic component performance assumptions. Excellent heat transfer at low-pressure drop was found critical to the success of both systems. The rotary magnetic refrigerator was found to have a clear advantage in work minimization because it relies on efficient electric drives and inherent magnetic force balancing to minimize the net cycle work, rather than coupling isothermal compressors to mechanical expanders to recover work. Several key problems are discussed that must be solved to realize the potential high thermodynamic efficiencies in a cost-effective manner.


Heat Exchanger Entropy Production Entropy Generation Magnetocaloric Effect Magnetic Refrigeration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Barclay, J. A. “An Analysis of Liquefaction of Helium Using Magnetic Refrigeration,” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Report, No. LA-8991. (December 1981)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barclay, J. A. “A Comparison of the Efficiency of Gas and Magnetic Refrigerators”, Proc. of 22nd National Heat Transfer Conference, Niagara Falls, NY, (Aug. 1984)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barclay, J. A. “Can Magnetic Refrigerators Liquefy Hydrogen at High Efficiency?” Paper presented at 20th National Heat Transfer Conference, Milwaukee, WI. Paper No. 81-HT-82. (August 2–5, 1981)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pecharsky, V. K. and Gschneidner, K. A. “Tunable Magnetic Regenerator Alloys with a Giant Magnetocaloric Effect for Magnetic Refrigeration from ~20 K to -290 K”, J. Appl. Phys. (February, 1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang, X. X., Tejada, J., Xin, Y., Sun, G. F., Wong, K. W. and Bohigas, X. “Magnetocaloric effect in La0.67Ca0.33MnO and La0.60Y0.07Ca0.33MnO bulk materials”; Appl. Phys. Lett. 69(23), pp. 3596–3598 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Russo, C., American Superconductor Company, private communication. (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Merida Donis, W. “Development of Monolithic Regenerator Technology for Low Temperature (4 K) Gifford McMahon Cryocoolers”, M. A. Sc. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, and references therein. (December 1996)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patton, G., Green, G., Stevens, J. and Humphrey, J. “Reciprocating Magnetic Refrigerator”, Proc. 4th Intl. Cryocoolers Conf., Easton, Md. (1986).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Green, G., Chafe, J., Stevens, J. and Humphrey, J. “A Gadolinium-Terbium Active Regenerator”, Adv. Cryo. Eng., Vol. 35, pp 1165–1174, Plenum Press, NY. (1990).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, A. A., Johnson, J. W., Niemi, R. W., Sternberg, A. A. and Zimm, C. B. Experimental Results of an Efficient Active Magnetic Regenerator Refrigerator, 8th Intl. Cryocooler Conf., Vail, CO. (1994)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hall, J. L., Reid, C. E., Spearing, I. G. and Barclay, J. A. “Thermodynamic Considerations For The Design Of Active Magnetic Regenerative Refrigerators”, Adv. Cryo. Eng., Vol. 41, Plenum Press, N. Y. (1996).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hall, J. L. and Barclay, J. A. “A Prototype Active Magnetic Regenerative Liquefier For Natural Gas, Part 1: Design and Construction”, manuscript in progress. (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barclay, J. A. “The Theory Of An Active Magnetic Regenerative Refrigerator”, Los Alamos Report LA-UR-82–1792 (1982). (Also NASA-CP-2287, 1983)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barclay, J. A. “Magnetic Refrigeration: the Promise and the Problems”, Proceedings of the 21st Space Congress, Kennedy Spaceflight Center, FL (1984).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zimm, C. B. Astronautics Corporation of America, private communication (1997).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Swift, W.L. “Single-Stage Reverse-Brayton Cryocooler: Performance of the Engineering Model”, Cryocoolers8, pp 499–506, Plenum Press, NY. (1995)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ankermann, T. “Small scale liquefaction of hydrogen utilizing Reverse Brayton and modified Claude cycle helium gas refrigeration cycles”, Proc. of the XVIIIth Int’l Congress of Refrigeration, Montreal, PQ, Canada, pgs 306–313. (August 10–17, 1991)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nilles, M.J., Calkins, M. E., Dingus, M. L. and Hendricks, J. B. “Heat Transfer and Flow Friction in Perforated Plate Heat Exchangers”, Aerospace Heat Exchanger Technology, R. K. Shah and A. Hashemi, eds., Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (1993)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barclay, J. A. and Stewart, W. F. “The Effect of Parasitic Refrigeration on the Efficiency of Magnetic Liquefiers, Proceedings IECEC’82, The 17th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conf.. Aug. (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. L. Hall
    • 1
  • J. A. Barclay
    • 1
  1. 1.Cryofuel SystemsUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations