Measurement of Heat Conduction through Stacked Screens

  • M. A. Lewis
  • T. Kuriyama
  • F. Kuriyama
  • R. Radebaugh
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering book series (ACRE, volume 43)


This paper describes the experimental apChapautus for the measurement of heat conduction through stacked screens as well as some experimental results taken with the apChapautus. Screens are stacked in a fiberglass-epoxy cylinder, which is 24.4 mm in diameter and 55 mm in length. The cold end of the stacked screens is cooled by a Gifford-McMahon (GM) cryocooler at cryogenic temperature, and the hot end is maintained at room temperature. Heat conduction through the screens is determined from the temperature gradient in a calibrated heat flow sensor mounted between the cold end of the stacked screens and the GM cryocooler. The samples used for these experiments consisted of 400-mesh stainless steel screens, 400-mesh phosphor bronze screens, and two different porosities of 325-mesh stainless steel screens. The wire diameter of the 400-mesh stainless steel and phosphor bronze screens was 25.4 μm and the 325-mesh stainless steel screen wire diameters were 22.9 urn and 27.9 μm. Standard porosity values were used for the experimental data with additional porosity values used on selected experiments. The experimental results showed that the helium gas between each screen enhanced the heat conduction through the stacked screens by several orders of magnitude compared to that in vacuum. The conduction degradation factor is the ratio of actual heat conduction to the heat conduction where the regenerator material is assumed to be a solid rod of the same cross-sectional area as the metal fraction of the screen. This factor was about 0.1 for the stainless steel and 0.022 for the phosphor bronze, and almost constant for the temperature range of 40 to 80 K at the cold end.


Cold Plate Heat Leak Degradation Factor Heat Conduction Loss Stainless Steel Screen 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Walker, G., Cry coolers, Plenum Press, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Organ, A. J., “Conductivity for quantifying regenerator thermal shorting,” to be published.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, A.C., “Contact resistance of 500 mesh regenerator screens,” Cryogenics, Vol 34, No. 5 (1994), pp. 451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schumann, T.E.W., and Voss, V., “Heat Flow Through Granulated Material,” Fuel, Vol. 13 (1934), pp. 249–256.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Takeno., “Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Advanced Cryogenic Materials at Low Temperatures,” Cryogenic Engineering, Journal of the Cryogenic Society of Japan, Vol. 12, No. 3 (1986), pp. 182–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gary, J., Daney, D.E., and Radebaugh, R., “A Computational Model for a Regenerator,” Proc. Third Cryocooler Conference, NBS Special Publication 698, (1985), p. 199.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gary, J. and Radebaugh, R., “An Improved Numerical Model for Calculation of Regenerator Performance (REGEN3.1),” Proc. Fourth Interagency Meeting on Cryocoolers, David Taylor Research Center, Report DTRC-91/003, (1991), p. 165.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Lewis
    • 1
  • T. Kuriyama
    • 2
  • F. Kuriyama
    • 3
  • R. Radebaugh
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of Standards and TechnologyBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Guest Researcher from Toshiba Co.Japan
  3. 3.Guest Researcher from EBARA Research Co.Japan

Personalised recommendations