Structural Analysis of the Paracrystalline Layer of Campylobacter fetus Subsp. Venerealis UA809

  • Lori L. Graham
  • Terry J. Beveridge
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 252)


Campylobacter fetus subsp. venerealis (C. venerealis) is a major concern in the cattle and sheep industries since infections with this organism can result in infertility (Penner, 1988). The chronic inflammation associated with C. venerealis infections is likely due to the persistence of the whole organism or its constituents within the host. Recently, proteinaceous or glycoproteinaceous bacterial S-layers have been implicated as factors enhancing bacterial virulence. In some Campylobacter fetus strains the Slayer appears to protect the infecting bacterium from serum killing and phagocytosis by PMN leukocytes (Blaser et al., 1991), whereas in other strains, the S-layer undergoes antigenic variation (Dubreuil et al., 1990). These functional attributes would facilitate persistence of campylobacters within a host and in the case of C. venerealis infections, contribute to the chronic inflammation.


Guanidine Hydrochloride Serum Killing Sheep Industry Surface Protein Layer Thin Section Electron 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blaser, M.J., Smith, P.F., Repine, J.E., and Joiner, K.A., 1991, Pathogenesis of Campylobacter fetus infections. Failure of encapsulated Campylobacter fetus to bind C3b explains serum and phagocytosis resistance, J. Clin. Invest. 81: 1434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dubreuil, J.D., Kostrzynska, M., Austin J.W., and Trust, T.J., 1990, Antigenic differences among Campylobacter fetus S layer proteins, J. Bacteriol. 172: 5035.Google Scholar
  3. Dubreuil, J.D., Logan, S.M., Cubbage, S., Eidhin, D.N., McCubbin, W.D., Kay, C.M., Beveridge, T.J., Ferris, F.G., and Trust, T.J., 1988, Structural and biochemical analysis of a surface array protein of Campylobacter fetus, J. Bacteriol. 170: 4165.Google Scholar
  4. Graham, LL and Beveridge, T.J., 1990, Evaluation of freeze-substitution and conventional embedding protocols for routine electron microscopic processing of eubacteria, J. Bacteriol. 172: 2141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fujimoto, S., Takade, A., Amako, K., and Blaser, M.J., 1991. Correlation between molecular size of the surface array protein and morphology and antigenicity of the Campylobacter fetus S layer, Infect. Immun. 59: 2017.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fujimoto, S., Umeda, A., Takade, A., Murata K., and Amako, K., 1989, Hexagonal surface layer of Campylobacter fetus isolated from humans, Infect. Immun. 57: 2563.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Lam, J.S., Graham, LL, Lightfoot, J., Dasgupta T., and Beveridge, T.J., 1992, Ultrastructural examination of the lipopolysaccharide of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains and their isogenic rough mutants by freeze substitution, J. BacterioL 174: 7159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Penner, J.L, 1988, The genus Campylobacter: a decade of progress, Clin. Microbio1. Rev. 1: 157.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lori L. Graham
    • 1
  • Terry J. Beveridge
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology College of Biological ScienceUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations