Advertisement

Future Studies

  • Nigel W. Daw
Part of the Perspectives in Vision Research book series (PIVR)

Abstract

The third section of this book discusses what many people consider to be the current important question: What are the biochemical and molecular mechanisms of plasticity in the visual cortex? Although progress is being made in understanding mechanisms for LTP, progress regarding sensory-dependent plasticity in the visual cortex will inevitably be much slower, unless someone can show that the mechanisms are the same in the two cases, by some procedure that is less tedious than simply repeating everything done with LTP on sensory-dependent plasticity. In addition, there is some evidence of more than one type of LTP (dependent and not dependent on NMDA receptors), some evidence that LTP occurs where sensory-dependent plasticity does not, and some suggestions that there are anatomical changes in sensory-dependent plasticity that are not found with LTP.

Keywords

Visual Cortex Critical Period Primary Visual Cortex Ocular Dominance Direction Selectivity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ariel, M., and Daw, N. W., 1982, Pharmacological analysis of directionally sensitive rabbit retinal ganglion cells, J. Physiol. (London) 324:161–185.Google Scholar
  2. Daw, N. W., 1962, Why after-images are not seen in normal circumstances, Nature 196:1143–1145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Duffy, F. H., Snodgrass, S. R., Burchfield, J. L., and Conway, J. L., 1976, Bicuculline reversal of deprivation amblyopia in the cat, Nature 260:256–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eysel, U. T., Muche, T., and Worgotter, F., 1988, Lateral interactions at direction-selective striate neurones in the cat demonstrated by local cortical inactivation, J. Physiol. (London) 399:657–675.Google Scholar
  5. Ferster, D., 1987, Origin of orientation-selective EPSPs in simple cells of cat visual cortex, J. Neurosci. 7:1780–1791.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Forrest, D., Yuzaki, M., Soares, H. D., Ng, L., Luk, D. C., Sheng, M., Stewart, C. L., Morgan, J. I., Connor, J. A., and Curran, T., 1994, Targeted disruption of NMDA receptor 1 gene abolishes NMDA response and results in neonatal death, Neuron 13:325–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Freeman, R. D., and Tsumoto, T., 1983, An electrophysiological comparison of convergent and divergent strabismus in the cat: Electrical and visual activation of single cortical cells, J. Neurophysiol. 49:238–253.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gordon, J. A., Silva, A., Morris, R., Stewart, C., Silver, I., Tokugawa, Y., and Stryker, M. P., 1994, Plasticity in mouse visual cortex: Critical period and effects of αCaMKII and Thy-I mutations, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 20:465.Google Scholar
  9. Grant, S., and Berman, N. E. J., 1991, Mechanism of anomalous retinal correspondence: Maintenance of binocularity with alteration of receptive-field position in the lateral suprasylvian (LS) visual area of strabismic cats, Vis. Neurosci. 7:259–281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harris, C. S., 1965, Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision, Psychol. Rev. 72:419–444.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Held, R., 1965, Plasticity in sensory-motor systems, Sci. Am. 213:84–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Helveston, E. M., 1993, The origins of congenital esotropia, J. Pediatr. Ophthalmol. Strabismus 30:215–232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacobs, D. S., and Blakemore, C., 1988, Factors limiting the postnatal development of visual acuity in the monkey, Vision Res. 28:947–958.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jagadeesh, B., Wheat, H. S., and Ferster, D., 1993, Linearity of summation of synaptic potentials underlying direction selectivity in simple cells of the cat visual cortex, Science 262:1901–1904.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kohler, I., 1964, The formation and transformation of the perceptual world. (tr. H. Fiss), Psychol. Issues 3 (4).Google Scholar
  16. Poggio, G. F., Gonzalez, F., and Krause, F., 1988, Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: Binocular correlation and disparity selectivity, J. Neurosci. 8:4531–4550.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Sengpiel, F., Blakemore, C., Kind, P. C., and Harrad, R., 1994, Interocular suppression in the visual cortex of strabismic cats, J. Neurosci. 14:6855–6871.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sillito, A. M., 1984, Functional considerations of the operation of GABAergic inhibitory processes in the visual cortex, in: Cerebral Cortex (E. G. Jones and A. Peters, eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sillito, A. M., Kemp, J. A., and Blakemore, C. 1981, The role of GABAergic inhibition in the cortical effects of monocular deprivation, Nature 291:318–320.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Silva, A. J., Stevens, C. F., Tonegawa, S., and Wang, Y., 1992, Deficient hippocampal long-term potentiation in α-calcium-calmodulin kinase II mutant mice, Science 257:201–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stratton, G. M., 1897, Vision without inversion of the retinal image, Psychol. Rev. 4:241–360.Google Scholar
  22. Tychsen, L., 1993, Motion sensitivity and the origins of infantile strabismus, in: Early Visua Development, Normal and Abnormal (K. Simons, ed.), Oxford University Press, London, pp. 364–390.Google Scholar
  23. Wyatt, H. J., and Daw, N. W, 1976, Specific effects of neurotransmitter antagonists on ganglion cells in rabbit retina, Science 191:204–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nigel W. Daw
    • 1
  1. 1.Yale University Medical SchoolNew Haven, ConnecticutUK

Personalised recommendations