Advertisement

The Determination of the Chemical Species of Some of the “Hydride Elements” (Arsenic, Antimony, Tin and Germanium) in Seawater: Methodology and Results

  • Meinrat O. Andreae
Part of the NATO Conference Series book series (NATOCS, volume 9)

Abstract

A number of elements in the fourth, fifth and sixth group of the periodic system form hydrides upon reduction with sodium borohydride, which are stable enough to be of use for chemical analysis (Ge, Sn, Pb, As, Sb, Se, Te). Of these elements, we have investigated in detail arsenic, antimony, germanium and tin. The inorganic and organometallic hydrides are separated by a type of temperature-programmed gas-chromatography. In most cases it is optimal to combine the functions of the cold trap and the chromatographic column in one device. The hydrides are quantified by a variety of detection systems, which take into account the specific analytical chemical properties of the elements under investigation. For arsenic, excellent detection limits (≅40 pg) can be obtained with a quartz tube cuvette burner which is positioned in the beam of an atomic absorption spectrophotometer. For some of the methylarsines, similar sensitivity is available by an electron capture detector. The quartz-burner/AAS system has a detection limit of 90 pg for tin; for this element much lower limits (≅10 pg) are possible with a flame photometric detection system, which uses the extremely intense emission of the SnH molecule at 609.5 nm. The formation of GeO at the temperatures of the quartz tube furnace makes this device quite insensitive for the determination of germanium. Excellent detection limits (≅140 pg) can be reached for this element by the combination of the hydride generation system with a modified graphite furnace/AAS.

The application of these techniques has led to the discovery of a number of organometallic species of arsenic, tin and antimony in the marine environment. Germanium has not been observed to form organometallic compounds in nature. Some aspects of the geochemical cycles of these elements which have been elucidated by the use of these methods will be discussed.

Keywords

Graphite Furnace Hydride Generation Cold Trap Total Arsenic Dimethylarsinic Acid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Marsh, J., 1837: Beschreibung eines neuen Verfahrens, um kleine Quantitaten Arsenik von den Substanzen abzuscheiden womit er gemischt ist. Ann. Chem., 23, 207.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mohr, F., 1837: Zusätze zu Marsh’s Arsenikentdeckung. Ann. Chem., 23, 247.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braman, R.S., L.L. Justen and C.C. Foreback, 1972: Direct volatilization-spectral emission type detection system for nanogram amounts of arsenic and antimony. Anal. Chem., 44, 2195.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holak, W., 1969: Gas-sampling technique for arsenic determination by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Anal. Chem., 41, 1712.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braman, R.S. and C.C. Foreback, 1973: Methylated forms of arsenic in the environment. Science, 182, 1247.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Andreae, M.O., 1977: Determination of arsenic species in natural waters. Anal. Chem., 49, 820.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Braman, R.S. and M.A. Tompkins, 1979: Separation and determination of nanogram amounts of inorganic tin and methyltin compounds in the environment. Anal. Chem., 51, 12.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Talmi, Y. and D.T. Bostick, 1975: Determination of alkyl-arsenic acids in pesticide and environmental samples by gas chromatography with a microwave emission spectrometric detection system. Anal. Chem., 47, 2145.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Andreae, M.O. and P.N. Froelich, Jr., 1981: Determination of germanium in natural waters by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry with hydride generation. Anal. Chem., 53, 287.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andreae, M.O., J.-F. Asmod’, P. Foster and L. Van’t dack, 1981: Determination of antimony(III), antimony(V), and methylantimony species in natural waters by atomic absorption spectrometry with hydride generation. Anal. Chem., 53, 1766.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Andreae, M.O. and J.T. Byrd, 1981: Determination of tin and methyltin species in natural waters. Submitted to Anal. Chem.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Foreback, C.C., 1973: Some studies on the detection and determination of mercury, arsenic and antimony in gas discharges. Thesis, Univ. of South Florida, Tampa.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tompkins, M.A., 1977: Environmental-analytical studies of antimony, germanium and tin. Thesis, Univ. of South Florida, Tampa.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fleming, H.H. and R.G. Ide, 1976: Determination of volatile hydride-forming metals in steel by atomic absorption spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta., 83, 67.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Crecelius, E.A., 1978: Modification of the arsenic speciation technique using hydride generation. Anal. Chem., 50, 826.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Andreae, M.O., 1978: Distribution and speciation of arsenic in natural waters and some marine algae. Deep-Sea Res., 25, 391.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Andreae, M.O., 1979: Arsenic speciation in seawater and interstitial waters: the influence of biological-chemical interactions on the chemistry of a trace element. Limnol. Oceanogr., 24, 440.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cutter, G.A., 1978: Species determination of selenium in natural waters. Anal. Chim. Acta., 98, 59.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Robbins, W.B. and J.A. Caruso, 1979: Development of hydride generation methods for atomic spectroscopic analysis. Anal. Chem., 51, 890A.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wood, J.M., 1974: Biological cycles for toxic elements in the environment. Science, 183, 1049.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Andreae, M.O. and D. Klumpp, 1979: Biosynthesis and release of organoarsenic compounds by marine algae. Environ. Sci. Technol., 13, 738.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cooney, R.V., R.O. Mumma and A.A. Benson, 1978: Arsoniumphospholipid in algae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75, 4262.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Edmonds, J.S. and K.A. Francesconi, 1977: Methylated arsenic from marine fauna. Nature, 265, 436.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baes, C.F. and R.E. Mesmer, 1976: “The Hydrolysis of Cations” Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huey, C., F.E. Brinckman, S. Grim and W.P. Iverson, 1974: The role of tin in bacterial methylation of mercury. Proc. Internatl. Conf. on Transport of Persistent Chemicals in Aquatic Ecosystems, Natl. Research Council of Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Froelich, P.N. and M.O. Andreae, 1981: The marine geochemistry of germanium: Eka-Silicon. Science, 213, 205.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schutz, D.F. and K.K. Turekian, 1965: The investigation of the geographical and vertical distribution of several trace elements in sea water using neutron activation analysis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta., 29, 259.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Meinema, H.A. and J.G. Noltes, 1972: Investigations on organoantimony compounds.VI. Preparation and properties of thermally stable dialkylantimony(V) compounds of the types R2 Sb(OR’)3, R2Sb(OAc)3 and R2 Sb(O)OH. J. Organomet. Chem., 36, 313.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meinrat O. Andreae
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OceanographyFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA

Personalised recommendations