Cultural Psychology Meets Evolutionary Psychology: Toward a New Role for Biology in the Study of Culture and Experience

  • Paul Voestermans
  • Cor Baerveldt
Chapter

Summary

In this article we argue that evolutionary psychology’s study of culture in the framework of memetics and in terms of modules in the brain, supposedly designed in response to adaptive problems in the stone age, suffers from a few shortcomings. Therefore, the central issue of cultural psychology, that is understanding in psychological terms the patterning of behavior, remains untouched. First, the notion of causality, which is central to the Integrated Causal Model approach as an alternative to the Standard Social Science Model, is too narrowly defined. Second, the animal nature of the human species is presented in insufficient detail. The brain is cut loose from its embodied existence and treated as an isolated entity. Brains exist in the plural and develop in the intrinsically social group, as we argue. A more viable brain-approach to culture is called for. Enactivism, as the central tenet of this new approach, emphasizes the brain as an embodied control structure which operates in a community of experiencers.

Keywords

Combustion Europe Coherence Defend Prefix 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baerveldt, C. (1998) Culture and the consensual coordination of actions. Ph.D. thesis. Nijmegen Cultural Psychology Group.Google Scholar
  2. Baerveldt. C. and Verheggen, T. (1999). Enactivism and the experiential reality of culture: Rethinking the epistemological basis of cultural psychology. Culture and Psychology, 5 (2), 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barkow, J.H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (1992). The adapted mind. Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford. Google Scholar
  4. Blackmore, S. (1999). The meme machine. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bonner, J. (1980). The evolution of culture in animals, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Calvin, W. (1986). The river that flows uphill: A journey from the Big Bang to the Big Brain. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (1994) Beyond intuition and instinct blindness: Toward an evolutionary rigorous cognitive science. Cognition, 50, 41–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. (1997). Evolutionary psychology: A primer. Internet http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/primer.html.
  8. Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  9. Deacon, T.W. (1997). The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  10. Dennett, D. C. (1991). Darwin’s dangerous idea. Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  11. Diamond J (1992) The rise and fall of the third chimpanzee. New York: Harper Collins. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Holloway, R. (1996). Evolution of the human brain. In A. Lock and C. Peters (Eds) Handbook of human symbolic evolution. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Kitcher, P. (1985) Vaulting ambition. Sociobiology and the quest of human nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999) Philosophy in the flesh. The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Lock, A. and Peters, C. (Eds) (1996). Handbook of human symbolic evolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Montagu, M. (1964). Culture: Man’s adaptative dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  17. Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: MorrowGoogle Scholar
  18. Place, U.T. (2000) The role of the hand in the evolution of language. Psycoloquy, 11. Internet: ftp://ftp.princeton.edupub/harnad/Psycoloquy/2000.volume.11
  19. Simpson, J.A. and Kenrick, D.T. (1997). Evolutionary social psychology. Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum. Singer, W. ( 1997 ). The observer in the brain. Invited address at the New Trends in Cognitive Science Conference, Vienna.Google Scholar
  20. Singer, W. (1999) Neurobiology. Striving for coherence. Nature, 397 (6718), 391–393. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Tooby, J. and Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J.H. Barkow, L. Cosmides and J. Tooby (1992) The adapted mind. Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford, p. 19–136.Google Scholar
  22. Voestermans, P. (1999). Cultural psychology looks at culture. In W. Maiers, B Bayer, B. Duarte Esgalhado, R. Jorna and E Schraube (Eds.) Challenges to theoretical psychology (pp. 304312 ) North Ontario: Captus.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Voestermans
    • 1
  • Cor Baerveldt
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations