A Problem Aired: Radio Therapeutic Discourse and Modes of Subjection

  • Ian Hodges
Chapter

Summary

A theory-driven analysis (cf. Foucault, 1992) of therapeutic discourse which draws upon conversational analytic principles is presented using selected excerpts from a radio phone-in counselling broadcast. It is argued that the discursive techniques identified within the broadcast accomplish a reshaping of the caller’s account of their problem at the moment it is told. It is suggested that this reformulation should be conceptualised as a mode of subjection, operating upon callers’ self-identity and self-expectations — that is therapeutic discourse should be understood as ethical in operation.

Keywords

Income Clarification Metaphor Milton 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and arguing: The social organisation of accounts. London: Sage. Atkinson, J. M., and Heritage, J. (Eds). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boden, D., and Zimmerman, D. (Eds). (1991). Talk and social structure. Cambridge: Polity. Dryden, W. (1992). Rational-emotive counselling in action. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Dryden, W., and Feltham, C. (1992). Brief counselling: A practical guide for beginning practitioners.Google Scholar
  4. Buckingham: Open University Press.Dryden, W., and Yankura, J. (1992). Daring to be myself A case study in rational-emotive therapy. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Edwards, D., and Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Egan, G. (1990). The skilled helper: A systematic approach to effective helping (4th ed.). CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  7. Fiske, J. (1990). Introduction to communication studies (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Foucault, M. (1988). On problematisation. History of the Present, 4, 16–17.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (1992). The use of pleasure: The history of sexuality, Volume Two. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. Hacking, I. (1995). Rewriting the soul: Multiple personality and the sciences of memory. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hodges, I. (1995). Changing your mind: Therapeutic discourse and Foucault’s ethics. In I. Lubek, R. van-Hezewijk, G. Pheterson, and C. Tolman (Eds), Trends and issues in theoretical psychology (pp. 301–305 ). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Hodges, I. (1998) A problem aired: Exploring radio therapeutic discourse and ethical self-formation. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of London, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Hutton, P. H. (1988). Foucault, Freud and the technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, and P. H. Hutton (Eds), Technologies of the self A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 121144 ). London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  14. Maranhao, T. (1986). Therapeutic discourse and Socratic dialogue: A cultural critique. Wisconsin: University of Wiscons in Press.Google Scholar
  15. Miller, P. (1987). Domination and power. London: Routledge & Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
  16. Nelson-Jones, R. (1992). The theory and practice of counselling psychology. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  17. Patterson, C. H. (1995). Theories of counselling and psychotherapy. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  18. Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimising claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sacks, H., Schegloff, A. E., and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schegloff, A. E., and Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Silverman, D., and Torode, B. (1980). The material word: Some theories of language and its limits. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian Hodges
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WestminsterUK

Personalised recommendations