Advertisement

Individual Responsibility and Society: A Subject Science Approach

  • Ute Osterkamp
Chapter

Summary

This article questions the prevailing individualized notions of subjectivity, individuality and responsibility and points to their function in justifying restrictive conditions by reversing the causes and the consequences of suppression. It advances the notion of “meta-subjectivity” referring to the specific human potentiality of consciously influencing the conditions influencing us — only to be realized on a meta-individual level and necessarily implying our responsibility for societal development and thus also for the situation and behavior of others. This is elucidated using approaches explicitly criticizing traditional psychology’s individualism while replacing it by a more societal approach and showing how such approaches relapse into individualism when they ignore specific human “meta-subjectivity” and along with it the manifold obstacles to realizing it.

Keywords

Societal Condition Critical Psychology Emotional Appraisal Social Constructionist Theory Traditional Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Améry, J. (1988). Ressentiments. In J. Améry Jenseits von Schuld und Sühne. Bewältigungsversuche eines Überwältigten (pp. 81–101 ). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
  2. Armon-Jones, C. (1986). The social function of emotion. In R. Harré (Ed.), The social construction of emotion ( 57–82 ). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Freud. S. (1981/1915). Instincts and their vicissitudes. In J. Strachey, The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. (Vol. XIV, pp.105–140). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  5. Fulani, L. (1998). Moving beyond morality and identity. In Burman, E. (Ed.), Deconstructing feminist psychology (pp. 140–158 ). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Greenwood, J. D. (1994). Realism, identity and emotion: Reclaiming social psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Holzkamp, K. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie. Frankfurt/M.: Campus.Google Scholar
  8. Holzkamp, K. (1996). Psychologie. Selbstverständigung über Handlungsbegründungen alltäglicher Lebensführung. Forum Kritische Psychologie 36, 7–112.Google Scholar
  9. Kertész, I. (1997). Galeerentagebuch. Reinbek: Rohwohlt.Google Scholar
  10. Lazarus, R.S. (1977). Cognitive and coping processes in emotion. In A. Monat, & R.S. Lazarus (Eds) Stress and coping. An anthology (pp.145–158). New York: Columbia University Press Lazarus, R.S. (1990). Constructs of the mind in adaptation. In N.L. Stein, B. Leventhal & T. Trabasso (Eds), Psychological and biological approaches to emotion (pp. 3–19 ). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Levi, P. (1993). Die Untergegangenen und die Geretteten. München: dtv, 1993, pp. 33–69Google Scholar
  12. Nisan, M. (1986). Die moralische Bilanz. Ein Modell moralischen Entscheidens. In W. Edelstein andGoogle Scholar
  13. G. Nunner-Winkler (Hrsg.), Zur Bestimmung der Moral (pp. 347–376). Frankfurt/M.: SuhrkampGoogle Scholar
  14. Osterkamp, U. (1999a). Gefühle/Emotionen. In Historisch-Kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus Vol. 4, (pp. 1329–1347). Argument: HamburgGoogle Scholar
  15. Osterkamp, U. (1999b). Reflections on emotionality, morality, subjectivity and power. Paper presented at the Millennium World Conference on Critical Psychology, Sydney, April/May. Peitsch, H. (1990). “Deutschlands Gedächtnis an seine dunkelste Zeit”. Zur Funktion der Autobiographik in den Westzonen Deutschlands und den Westsektoren von Berlin 1945 bis 1949. Berlin: SigmaGoogle Scholar
  16. Scarry. E. (1985). The body in pain: The making and unmaking of the world. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Solomon, R.C. (1984). Getting angry. The Jamesian theory of emotion in anthropology. In R. A. Shweder & R. A. LeVine (Eds), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self and emotion (pp. 238–254 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Solomon, R.C. (1993). The philosophy of emotions. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds), Handbook of emotion (pp. 3–14 ). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ute Osterkamp
    • 1
  1. 1.Free University of BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations