Advertisement

Being Cliched: Women’s Talk and Feminine Subjectivities

  • Niamh Stephenson
Chapter

Summary

In this chapter, I discuss ways of theorising the relationship between women’s subjectivities and social practices of talk. I draw on sexual difference feminism (e.g. Irigaray, 1977; Irigaray 1985a; Irigaray 1985b; Irigaray, 1993) to argue for the need to move beyond phallocentric accounts of women’s subjectivities, and to theorise power relations as intrinsic to social practices of talk (rather than describing the operation of power as disruptive of ordinary conversation). This approach to power offers a critique of many claims to equality between the sexes, on the basis that such claims perpetuate phallocentric versions of subjectivity. But here, I draw on a notion of “fictional equality” (Sennett, 1976), arguing that particular conventions which involve acting as if equality existed can be thought to result in the subversion of phallocentric subjectivities. This is because conventions of talk in which the subject is constituted as self-distanced might undermine the unitary, self-knowing attributes of phallocentric subjectivity. My argument begins with, and progresses through a discussion of one particular account of a young woman talking to a man on a bus.

Keywords

Social Practice Social Convention Public Realm Symbolic Order False Consciousness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ang, I. (1994). In the realm of uncertainty: The global village and capitalist postmodemity. In D. Crowley and D. Mitchell (Eds), Communication theory today (pp. 193–213 ). Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Crawford, J., Kippax, S., Onyx, J., Gault, U., and Benton, P. (1992). Emotion and gender: Constructing meaningfrom memory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Crawford, M. (1995). Talking difference: On gender and language. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Hall, C. (1985). Private persons versus public someones: Class, gender and politics in England, 17801850. In C. Steedman, C. Urwin and V. Walkerdine (Eds), Language, gender and childhood (pp. 10–33 ). London: Routledge, Kegan and Paul.Google Scholar
  5. Harré, R. (1983). Personal being: A theory for individual psychology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Haug, F. (Ed.). (1987) Female sexualization: A collective work of memory (E. Carter, Trans.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  7. Irigaray, L. (1977). Women’s exile. Ideology and Consciousness, 1, 62–76.Google Scholar
  8. Irigaray, L. (1985a). This sex which is not one (C. Porter with C. Burke, Trans.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Irigaray, L. (1985b). Speculum of the other woman (G. Gill, Trans.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Irigaray, L. (1993). Sexes and genealogies (G. Gill, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Joas, H. (1985). G. H. Mead: A contemporary re-examination of his thought (R. Meyer, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kristeva, J. (1986). Women’s time. In T. Moi (Ed.), The Kristeva reader (pp. 187–213 ). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman’s place. Language in Society, 2, 45–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  15. Mead, G. H. (1964). Selected writings of George Herbert Mead (A. J. Reck, Ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mead, G. H. (1981). On social psychology (A. Strauss, Ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Rose, J. (1986). Sexuality in the field of vision. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  17. Scott, J. (1993). The evidence of experience. In H. Abelove, M.A. Barale, and D.M. Halperin (Eds), The lesbian and gay studies reader (pp. 397–415 ). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Sennett, R. (1976). The fall of public man. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Stephenson, N. (1997). Strange expressions: Remembering women’s conversation. Unpublished PhD thesis, Maquarie University. Sydney.Google Scholar
  20. Stephenson, N. (in press). ‘Speaking as a woman’: Subjectivities and social practices of talk. Australian Psychologist.Google Scholar
  21. Stephenson, N., Kippax, S., and Crawford, J. (1996). You and me and she: Memory-work and the construction of self. In S. Wilkinson (Ed.), Feminist social psychologies: International perspectives (pp. 182–200 ). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Niamh Stephenson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Western SydneyNepeanAustralia

Personalised recommendations