And the Subject was Made Flesh: The Aesthetic and Corporate Dimensions of Psychology’s Body
In the development of the discipline of psychology two very different types of beings have stood in as psychology’s subjects of convenience; children and animals. The properties and characteristics attributed to these beings have varied radically over the history of twentieth century psychology with the result that children and animals under one theory looked little like the same beings under another. Despite the difficulties associated with characterizing these “others,” early twentieth century psychologists built bridges to animal psychology and developmental psychology not only for practical reasons but on the presumption that these others were capable of providing the raw material of the discipline. Yet animals and children continually defied the techno-wizardry of psychological theories at the same time as they were its most obvious recipients. This paper develops the thesis that the aesthetic representations of subjectivity made possible by animals and children on the one hand and their place in the corporatist enterprise of the new psychology on the other, made them suitable artefacts for cultivating the new science.
KeywordsMoral Philosophy Late Nineteenth Century Animal Psychology Interest Representation Intellectual Elite
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ankersmit, F. R. (1996). Aesthetic politics: Political philosophy beyond fact and value. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Deleule, D. (1992). The living machine: Psychology as organology. In J. Crary and S. Kwinter (Eds) Incorporations (pp. 203–233 ). New York: Zone.Google Scholar
- Furumoto, L. (1988). Shared knowledge: The experimentalists, 1904–1929. In J. G. Morawski (Ed.), The rise of experimentation in American psychology (pp. 94–113 ). New Haven, CT: YaleGoogle Scholar
- Hall, G. S. (1923). Life and confessions of a psychologist. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
- Richards, G. (1996). Putting psychology in its place. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ritvo, H. (1987). The animal estate: The English and other creatures in the Victorian age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar
- Stam, H. J. (1996). A body coporate: Early North American psychology and institutional culture. Paper presented at the 104th Convention of the -American Psychological Association, Toronto, August, 1996.Google Scholar
- Stam, H. J. (1999). Technologies ‘R’ us: Psychology and the production of new bodies. In Maiers, W., Bayer, B., Esgalhado, B. D., Jorna, R., and Schraub, E. (Eds) Challenges to theoretical psychology (pp. 332–340 ). Toronto: Captus Press.Google Scholar
- Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psychological Monographs, 2, (4, Whole No. 8).Google Scholar
- Titchener, E. B. (1961). The postulates of a structural psychology. In T. Shipley (Ed.), Classics in psychology (pp. 224–243). New York: Philosophical Library. (Original work published in 1898.)Google Scholar