Advertisement

Wittgenstein and Social Constructionism: Methods of “Social Poetics” or “Knots in our Thinking”?

  • Gavin B. Sullivan
Chapter

Summary

Given the increasing value placed on reflexive and discursive investigations in psychology by social constructionists, this paper examines the ongoing debate about the relevance of Wittgenstein’s later philosophy to the practices of psychology. Shotter, for example, argues that Wittgenstein provides psychologists with “methods of social poetics”. While the position adopted here is sympathetic to the view that a conceptual-discursive examination of the detail of our cultural and linguistic practices provides a valuable, shared and non-theoretical resource for potential multidisciplinary investigation, it is debatable whether Wittgenstein would countenance the “insertion” of his philosophical methods into the practices of psychology. Wittgenstein’s aim was to disentangle psychologist’s conceptual problems rather than present the discipline with radically new methods for the discipline which, as Shotter suggests, reject a central role for the “way of theory”. Therefore, it is by engaging with Wittgenstein’s philosophy to work through doubts about the conceptual adequacy of particular theories and the meaning of such phrases as “a Wittgensteinian practice in psychology” that we can begin to remove “knots in our thinking” about the enduring relevance of Wittgenstein’s philosophical method to critical psychological investigations.

Keywords

Social Constructionist Conceptual Problem Language Game Philosophical Investigation Linguistic Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, G. P., and Hacker, P. M. S. (1985). Wittgenstein: Rules, grammar and necessity Vol. 3. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  2. Budd, M. (1989). Wittgenstein’s philosophy of psychology. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Cioffi, F. (1998). Wittgenstein on Freud and Frazer, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Harré, R. (Ed.) (1986). The social construction of emotions, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Harré, R., and Gillet, G. (1994). The discursive mind. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Jost, J. T. (1995). Toward a Wittgensteinian social psychology of human development. Theory and Psychology, 5, 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Katz, A., and Shotter, J. (1996a). Articulating practices: Methods and experiences. Resonances from within the practice: social poetics in a mentorship program. Concepts and Transformation, I, 239–247.Google Scholar
  7. Katz, A., and Shotter, J. (1996b). Hearing the patient’s voice: Toward a “social poetics” in diagnostic interviews. Social Science and Medicine, 43, 919–931.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Parker, I. (Ed.) (1998). Social constructionism, discourse and realism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Rundle, B. (1995). Analytical philosophy and psychology. In J. A. Smith, R. Harré, and L. V. Langenhove (Eds), Rethinking psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Schon, D. A. (1995). Reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Aldershot: Arena. Shotter, J. (1992). Social constructionism and realism: Adequacy or accuracy? Theory and Psychology, 2, 175–182.Google Scholar
  11. Shotter, J. (1996). Wittgenstein in practice: from the way of theory to a social poetics. In C. W. Tolman, F. Cherry, R., van Hezewijk, and I. Lubek (Eds), Problems of theoretical Psychology. North York, Ontario: Captus Press.Google Scholar
  12. Shotter, J. (1999). Problems with the “way of theory”. In Maiers, W., Bayer, B., Esgalhado, B. D., Jorna, R., and Schraube, E. (Eds). Challenges to theoretical psychology. Captus: Ontario.Google Scholar
  13. Shotter, J., and Katz, A. (1996). Articulating practices: Methods and experiences. Articulating a practice from within the practice itself: Establishing formative dialogues by the use of a “social poetics.” Concepts and Transformations, 2, 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Trigg, R. (1991). Wittgenstein and social science. In A. P. Griffiths (Ed.), Wittgenstein centenary Essays: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, Vol. 28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. (G. E. M. Anscombe, trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Zettel. G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright (Eds). (G. E. M. Anscombe, trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Wittgenstein, L. (1974). Philosophical grammar. R. Rhees (Ed.). (A. Kenny, trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Wittgenstein, L. (1975). Philosophical remarks. R. Rhees (Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Wittgenstein, L. (1976). Wittgenstein’s lectures on the foundations of mathematics, Cambridge, 1939: From the notes of R.G. Bosanquet, Norman Malcolm, Rush Rhees and Yorick Smythies. C. Diamond (Ed.). Hassocks: Harvester.Google Scholar
  20. Wittgenstein, L. (1979). On certainty. G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright (Eds). (D. Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe, trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Wittgenstein, L. (1980a). Culture and value. G. H. von Wright (Ed.). (P. Winch, trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Wittgenstein, L. (1980b). Remarks on the philosophy of psychology Vol. I. G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright (Eds). (G. E. Anscombe, trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gavin B. Sullivan
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Western SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations