Advertisement

Getting Rid of the Homunculus: A Direct Realist Approach

  • Terence McMullen
Chapter

Summary

One of the problems arising in the representationist approach to cognition is that of the homunculus. How can cognition occur unless there is an inner “little man” who knows both what the representations are and what they represent? Dennett’s “intentional stance” account proposes a way out. By analogy with computer processes (e.g. we speak of “chess-playing” computers when, in fact, they know literally nothing about chess or anything else), it can be seen that human cognition can be analysed down to basic processing assemblies which are cognitively attenuated (“stupid”, “pseudo-cognitive”). Accordingly there is no need for representations, and so there is no homunculus problem. Dennett’s solution is unworkable: the notion of pseudo-or proto-cognition is unsustainable. Must the homunculus be reinstated? Not at all: the direct realist account of cognition as an irreducible relation provides a radical but coherent alternative.

Keywords

Folk Psychology Intentional Stance British Broadcasting Corporation Representationist Approach Artificial Intelligence Programmer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J. (1962). The knower and the known. In Studies in empirical philosophy (pp. 27–40 ). Sydney: Angus & Robertson. (Original work published 1927 ).Google Scholar
  2. Baker, A. J. (1986). Australian realism: The systematic philosophy of John Anderson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dennett, D. C. (1979). Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Hassocks. Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dennett, D. C. (1996). Kinds of minds: Towards an understanding of consciousness. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  6. Hume, D. (1888). Treatise of human nature, L.A. Selby-Bigge (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ( Original work published 1739 ).Google Scholar
  7. Mackie, J. L. (1985). The philosophy of John Anderson. In Logic and knowledge: Selected papers, Vol. I, J. Mackie and P. Mackie (Eds) (pp. 1–21 ). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. Miller, J. (Ed.) (1983). States of mind. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.Google Scholar
  9. Petocz, A. (1999). Freud, psychoanalysis and symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terence McMullen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations