Advertisement

Preliminaries

  • Akpofure E. Taigbenu
Chapter

Abstract

We may not be properly poised to talk about the Green element method (GEM) without making reference to the boundary element method (BEM) since both methods are founded on the same singular integral theory. The theoretical developments in boundary element (BE) circles can be traced to the eighteenth century when related theories of ideal fluid flow (potential flow) and of integral transforms were established, but it was not until the 1960’s that flurries of research activities on BEM intensified because of its acclaimed advantage of being a boundary-only method. Because the earlier boundary element applications were directed at elliptic boundary-value problems, the free-space Green’s function of the differential operator, which is Inr in 2-D. spatial dimensions and 1/r in 3-D. spatial dimensions, is amenable to Green’s identity which transforms the differential equation into an integral one that can essentially be implemented on the boundary (along a line for 2-D. and on a surface for 3-D.) of the computational domain. In the classical approach, a system of discrete equations is obtained from the integral equation by subdividing the boundary into segments over which distributions are prescribed for the primary variable and the flux (Jaswon [1], Jaswon and Ponter [2], Symm [3], Liggett [4], Liu and Liggett [5], Fairweather et al. [6], Rizzo [7], and others). These research thrusts were considered successful when viewed against the background that contemporary methods, like the finite element method (FEM) solved similar problems by discretizing the entire computational domain. This led to claims by most investigators that BEM was more superior than existing computational methods in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency. It is not in doubt that the integral replication of the differential equation provided by the boundary element theory evolves quite naturally, making use of the response function (free-space Green’s function) to a unit instantaneous input. It is only at the computational stage that the distribution of the dependent variable is approximated by some interpolating polynomial function. It is, thus, expected that for problems where the unit response function can be obtained, BEM achieves secondorder accuracy. The claim that BEM is superior to FEM in computational efficiency is not, in most cases, arrived at after actual CPU comparisons are carried, but it is alluded to on the basis of the boundary-only character of the method.

Keywords

Source Node Boundary Element Boundary Element Method Domain Integration Green Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jaswon, M.A., “Integral Equation Methods in Potential Theory, I”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser., A 275, pp. 23–32, 1963.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jaswon, M.A. and A.R. Ponter, “An Integral Equation Solution of the Torsion Problem”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser., A 275, pp. 237–246. 1963.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Symm, G.T., “Integral Equation Methods in Potential Theory, II”, Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser., A 275, pp. 33–46, 1963.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liggett, J.A., “Location of Free Surface in Porous Media”, J. Hyd Div., ASCE, 103 (HYA), pp. 353–365, 1977.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu, P. L-F. and J.A. Liggett, “An Efficient Numerical Method of Two-Dimensional Steady Groundwater Problems”, Water Resources Res., 14 (3), pp. 385–390, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fairweather, G., F.J. Rizzo, D.J. Shippy and Y.S. Wu, “On the Numerical Solution of Two-Dimensional Potential Problems by an Improved Boundary Integral Equation Method”, J. Comp. Phy., 31, pp. 96–112, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rizzo, F.J., “An Integral Equation approach to Boundary Value Problems of Classical Elastostatics”, Quart. Appl. Math (25), 1967.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clements, D.L., “A Boundary Integral Equation Method for the Numerical Solution of a Second-order Elliptic Equation with Variable Coefficients”, J Austrl. Math. Soc., 22B, pp. 218–228, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheng, A. H-D., “Darcy’s flow with variable permeability–A Boundary Integral Solution”, Water Resources Res., 20 (7), pp. 980–984, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lafe, O.E., “On Boundary Integral Formulation for the Direct and Inverse Problems in Heterogeneous and Deformable Aquifers”, Paper presented at Proceedings of the International Atomic Agency/UNESCO Seminar on Applications of Isotope and Nuclear Techniques in Hydrology of Arid and Semi-Arid Lands, Adana, Turkey, 1985a.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lafe, O.E., “A Boundary Integral Formulation for the Direct and Inverse Problem in Heterogeneous and Compressible Porous Media”, Paper presented at Proceedings, NATO Advanced Study Institute on the Fundamentals of Transport Phenomena in Porous Media, Newark, Del., 1985b.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lafe, O.E. and A. H-D. Cheng, “A Perturbation Boundary Element Code for Steady State groundwater Flow in Heterogeneous Aquifers”, Water Resources Res., 23 (6), pp. 1079–1084, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rizzo, F.J. and D.J. Shippy, “A Method of Solution for Certain Problems of Transient Heat Conduction”, AIAA, 8 (11), pp. 2004–2009, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liggett, J.A. and P.L-F. Liu, “Unsteady Flow in Confined Aquifers: A comparison of Two Boundary Integral Methods”, Water Resources Res., 15 (4), pp. 861–9886, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Taigbenu, A.E., AH-D. Cheng and J.A. Liggett, “Boundary Integral Solution to Seawater Intrusion into Coastal Aquifers”, Water Resources Res., 20 (8), pp. 1150–1158, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cheng, A. H-D and J.A. Liggett, “Boundary Integral Equation Methods for Linear Porous-Elasticity with Applications to Soil Consolidation”, Int. J Numer. Meth. Engrg., 20, pp. 255–278, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cheng, A. H-D and P. L-F Liu, “Seepage Forces on a Pipeline buried in a Poroelastic seabed under wave Loading”, Appl. Ocean Res., 8, pp. 22–32, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chang, Y.P., C.S. Kang and D.J. Chen, “The Use of Fundamental Green’s Functions for the Solution of Problems of Heat Conduction in Anisotropic Media”, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 16, pp. 1905–1918, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shaw, R.P., “An Integral Equation Approach to Diffusion”, Int. J Heat Mass Transfer$117, pp. 693–699, 1974.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brebbia, C.A. and L.C. Wrobel, “The Boundary Element Method for steady State and Transient Heat Conduction”, Numerical Methods in Thermal Problems, ed. by R.W. Lewis and K. Morgan, Prineridge Press, Swansea, Wales, 1979.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Banerjee, P.K. and R. Butterfield, Boundary Element Methods in Engineering Science, McGraw-Hill, London, U.K., 1981.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu, J.C., “Fundamental Solutions and Numerical Methods for Flow Problems”, Int. J Numer. Meth. Fluids, 4, pp. 185–201, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Taigbenu, A.E. and J.A. Liggett, “Boundary Element Calculations for Diffusion Equation”, J. Engrg. Mechanics, ASCE, 111 (3), pp. 311–328, 1985.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Taigbenu, A.E., “A new Boundary Element Formulation applied to unsteady aquifer problems”, Ph.D Thesis, Cornell University, 1985.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Taigbenu, A.E. and J.A. Liggett, “An Integral Formulation Applied to the Diffusion and Boussinesq Equations”, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engrg., 23, pp. 1057–1079, 1986a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Taigbenu, A.E. and J.A. Liggett, “An Integral Solution for the Diffusion-Advection Equation”, Water Resources Res., 22 (8) pp. 1237–1246, 1986b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liggett J.A. and A.E. Taigbenu, “Calculation of Diffusion, Advection-Diffusion and Boussinesq Flow by Integral Methods”, Proc. VI Int. Conf on the Finite Element Method in Water Resources, Lisbon, Portugal; pp. 723–733, 1986.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Brebbia, C.A. and D. Nardini, “Dynamic analysis in Solid Mechanics by an alternative Boundary Element Procedure”, Int. J. Soil Dynam. Earthquate Engrg., 2, pp. 228–233, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wrobel, L.C., and C.A. Brebbia, and D. Nardini, “The Dual Reciprocity Boundary Element Formulation for Transient Heat Conduction”, Proc. VI Int. Conf. on Finite Elements in Water Resources, pp. 801–812, 1986.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Aral, M.M. and Y Tang, “A New Boundary Element Formulation for Time-Dependent Confined and Unconfined Aquifer Problems”, Water Resources Res., 24 (6), pp. 831–842, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brebbia, C.A. and P. Skerget, “Diffusion-Advection Problems using Boundary Elements”, Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Finite Elements in Water Resources, Burlington Vermont, USA, pp. 747–768, 1984.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Taigbenu, A.E., “The Green Element Method,” Int. J for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 38, pp. 2241–2263, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Taigbenu, A.E., and O.O.Onyejekwe, “Green Element simulations of the Transient Unsaturated Flow Equation,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, 19, pp. 675–684, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Taigbenu, A.E., “Green Element Solutions of the 1-D. Steady Groundwater flow in Heterogeneous Aquifers”, Ife Journal of Technology, 5 (2), pp. 29–43, 1996.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Taigbenu„ A.E. and O.O. Onyejekwe, “A Mixed Green element formulation for transient Burgers’ equation”, Mt. J Num. Methods in Fluids, 24, pp. 563–578, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akpofure E. Taigbenu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Water EngineeringNational University of Science and TechnologyBulawayoZimbabwe

Personalised recommendations