Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Applied Optimization ((APOP,volume 54))

  • 1537 Accesses

Abstract

The Risk Metrics technical document proposes a methodology for Value-at-Risk analysis based on the idea of linearization of the portfolio pricing function leading to a Normal approximation of the profit and loss distribution. In this note we consider the density of the distribution of the change in value of a zero coupon bond. We describe all possible shapes of the density function assuming that log-returns of the risk factor have a normal distribution. In particular, we demonstrate that this density is defined on a finite interval. It has an infinite limit at the right end of this interval. Risk Metrics assumptions are used during our consideration. This theoretical effect becomes detectable if the volatility parameter takes large values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baron — Adesi G., F. Bourgoin, K. Giannopoulos (1998), “ Don’t look back,” Risk, 11 (8), 100–103.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dekkers A.L.M., de Haan L. (1989), “ On the estimation of the extreme value index and large quantile estimation,” Ann. Statist., 17, 1795–1832.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Embrechts P., McNeil A.J., Straumann D. (1998), “ Correlation and dependency in risk management: properties and pitfals,” Preprint ETH, Zurich; Short version of the paper was published in RISK, May 1999, 69–71.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Embrechts P., Kluppelberg C., Mikosch T. (1997), Modelling Extremal Events: Applications for Insurance and Finance, Springer, New York.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Finkelstein V. (1999), “ What to do with risky bonds,” Latin Risk. Risk special report, November, 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hull J.C. (1999), Options, Futures and other Derivative Securities, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lawrence C., G. Robinson (1995), “How safe is RiskMetrics ?” Risk, 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  8. RiskMetricsTM (1995), Technical Document, JPMorgan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rouvinez C. (1997), “Going Greek with VaR,” Risk, 10(2), 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sortino F., R. van der Meer, A. Plantinga. (1999), “The Dutch Triangle,” Journal of Portfolio Management, 26 (1), 50–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kreinin, A. (2001). Non-Linear Risk of Linear Instruments. In: Uryasev, S., Pardalos, P.M. (eds) Stochastic Optimization: Algorithms and Applications. Applied Optimization, vol 54. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6594-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6594-6_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-4855-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-6594-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics