Advertisement

Pulsed Squeezed Light

  • R. E. Slusher
  • A. LaPorta
  • P. Grangier
  • B. Yurke
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 190)

Abstract

Generation of squeezed light is at present limited to narrow regions of the optical spectrum.(1–3) For the parametric amplifiers used to generate squeezed light, this limit is imposed by the following properties of the nonlinear material used for the parametric process: 1) small nonlinear response, 2) linear losses, 3) insufficient laser pump power and 4) optical damage at high pump powers. Optical cavities have been used(1,2) to enhance the nonlinear interaction for continuous wave CW pumping but this limits the bandwidth and also increases the total linear loss.

Keywords

Pump Power Pulse Train Local Oscillator Polarization Beam Splitter Parametric Gain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. E. Slusher, L. W. Holberg, B. Yurke, J. C. Mertz and J. F. Valley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2409 (1985); and the collection of articles in “Squeezed States of the Electromagnetic Field,” H. J. Kimble and D. F. Walls, eds., JOSA B, October 1987.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ling- An Wu, H. J. Kimble, J. L. Hall and H. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2520 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. M. Shelby, M. D. Levenson, S. H. Perlmutter, R. G. DeVoe and D. F. Walls, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 691 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. E. Slusher, P. Grangier, A. La Porta, B. Yurke and M. J. Potasek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2566 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Yurke, P. Grangier, R. E. Slusher and M. J. Potasek, Phys. Rev. A 45, 3586 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Yurke, Phys. Rev. A 32, 300, 311 (1985).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Min Mao, Ling- An Wu, and H. J. Kimble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 278 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Grangier, R. E. Slusher, B. Yurke and A. La Porta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2153 ( (1987).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. K. Burns and N. Bloembergen, Phys. Rev. B 4, 3437 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. A. Valdmanis, Elec. Lett. 23, 1308 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Becker and J. K. McIver, Phys. Rev. A 27, 1030 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S. J. Carter, P. D. Drummond, M. D. Reid and R. M. Shelby, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1841 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Schleich and J. A. Wheeler, Nature 326, 574 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Grangier, M. J. Potasek and B. Yurke, Phys. Rev. A, to be published.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. D. Reid, submitted for publication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. E. Slusher
    • 1
  • A. LaPorta
    • 1
  • P. Grangier
    • 1
    • 2
  • B. Yurke
    • 1
  1. 1.AT&T Bell LaboratoriesMurray HillUSA
  2. 2.Institute d’Optique TheoriqueFrance

Personalised recommendations