The World Bank and social capital: Lessons from ten rural development projects in the Philippines and Mexico

  • Jonathan Fox
  • John Gershman


Social capital is widely recognized as one of the few sources of capital available to the poor, yet the processes by which development policies affect the accumulation of that social capital are not well understood. The World Bank, through its funding of development projects, affects the institutional environments for the accumulation of such social capital. The question is how to determine whether that institutional context is enabling, and to what degree. This paper compares ten recent World Bank-funded rural development projects in Mexico and the Philippines to explore how the processes of project design and implementation influence the institutional environments for the accumulation of horizontal, vertical, and intersectoral forms of pro-poor social capital. The findings have conceptual and policy implications for understanding the political dynamics of creating enabling environments for social capital accumulation by the poor.


Social Capital Civil Society Community Forestry Political Capital World Bank Project 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adelson, N. (1999). The rainfed areas development project: An assessment of World Bank reforms in action,’ Mexico City: Trasparencia.Google Scholar
  2. Bello, W. et al. (1983). Development Debacle: The World Bank in the Philippines. San Francisco: Institute for Food and Development Policy and Philippine Solidarity Network.Google Scholar
  3. Borras Jr., S. (1999). The Bibingka Strategy in Land Reform Implementation. Quezon City: Institute for Popular Democracy.Google Scholar
  4. Bray, D. (1995). `Peasant organization and the permanent reconstruction of nature: grassroots sustainable development in rural Mexico,’ Journal of Environment and Development 4 (2), 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bray, D. (1999). `Natural forests and plantations: Emerging trends in mexican forest policy,’ Florida International University, draft manuscript.Google Scholar
  6. Bray, D. and M. Wexler (1996). `Forest policies in Mexico,’ in Laura Randall, ed., Changing Structure of Mexico: Political, Social and Economic Prospects. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 217–228.Google Scholar
  7. Bretton Woods Commission (1994). Bretton Woods: Looking to the Future. Washington: Bretton Woods Commission.Google Scholar
  8. Broad, R. (1988). Unequal Alliance: The World Bank, the IMF, and the Philippines. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, L.D. (1991). `Bridging organizations and sustainable development,’ Human Relations 44 (8): 807–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, L.D. (1998). `Social learning in South-North coalitions: Constructing knowledge systems across social chasms,’ IDR Reports 14 (1).Google Scholar
  11. Brown, L.D. and D. Ashman (1996). `Participation, social capital and intersectoral problem-solving,’ World Development 19 (1), 1467–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown, L.D. and J. Fox (1998). `Accountability within transnational coalitions,’ in J. Fox and L.D. Brown, eds., The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs and Grassroots Movements. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 439–483.Google Scholar
  13. Carruthers, D. (1996). `Indigenous ecology and the politics of linkage in Mexican social movements,’ Third World Quarterly 17 (5): 1007–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caulfield, C. (1996). Masters of Illusion: The World Bank and the Poverty of Nations. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  15. Chamberlain, C. et al. (1999). `Fulfilling the IDA-12 mandate: Recommendations for expanding public access to information at the World Bank,’ Washington: Bank Information Center.Google Scholar
  16. Chavela, S.R. (1999). `Desvía la corrupción gubernamental apoyos del Banco Mundial,’ Noticias, February.Google Scholar
  17. Coronet, S., ed. (1996). Patrimony: Six Case Studies on Local Politics and the Environment in the Philippines. Manila: Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism.Google Scholar
  18. Covey, J. (1998). `Critical collaboration? Influencing the World Bank through policy dialogue and operational collaboration,’ in J. Fox and L.D. Brown, eds., The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs and Grassroots Movements. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 81–119.Google Scholar
  19. Cruz, I. (1993). `Las uniones de credito en Mexico,’AMUCSS Cuaderno del Trabajo 1, December.Google Scholar
  20. Cruz, I. (1995). `La integracion e la uniones e credito del sector social al sistema financiero Mexicano,’ presented at the Latin American Studies Association, Washington, DC, September 28–30.Google Scholar
  21. Cruz, M.C., L.B. Cornista and D.C. Dayan (1987). Legal and Institutional Issues of Irrigation Water Rights in the Philippines. Laguna: University of the Philippines-Los Banos Agrarian Reform Institute.Google Scholar
  22. Department of Finance, Philippines (1998). `Community based resource management project: project preparation report,’ prepared by Urban-Rural Balance for CBRMP, October 1998.Google Scholar
  23. DeWalt, B.R. and A. Toledo (1994). `Social assessment of Mexico aquaculture project,’ submitted to World Bank April 24.Google Scholar
  24. Esman, M. and N. Uphoff (1984). Local Organizations: Intermediaries in Rural Development. Ithaca: Cornell.Google Scholar
  25. Evans, P., ed. (1997). Government Action and Social Capital: State-Society Synergy in Development. Berkeley: Research Series/International and Area Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
  26. Fox, J. (1993a). `Democratic Rural Development: Leadership in Regional Peasant Organizations,’ Development and Change 23 (2): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fox, J. (1994). `Targeting the poorest: The role of the national indigenous institute in Mexico’s national solidarity program,’ in W. Cornelius, A. Craig and J. Fox, eds., Transforming State-Society Relations in Mexico: The National Solidarity Strategy. La Jolla: UCSD Center for U.S.Mexican Studies, pp. 179–216.Google Scholar
  28. Fox, J. (1995). `Governance and Development in Rural Mexico: State Intervention and Public Accountability,’ Journal of Development Studies 32 (1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fox, J. (1996a). `Local governance and citizen participation: Social capital and enabling policy environments,’ in R. Wilson, ed., Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Local Governance. Austin: LBJ School of Public Affairs, University of Texas.Google Scholar
  30. Fox, J. (1996b). `How does civil society thicken? The political construction of social capital in rural Mexico,’ World Development 24 (6): 1089–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fox, J. (1997a). `Transparency for accountability: Civil society monitoring of multilateral development bank anti-poverty projects,’ Development in Practice 7 (2): 167–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fox, J. (1997b). `The World Bank and social capital: Contesting the concept in practice,’ Journal of International Development 9 (7): 963–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fox, J. (1999). `The inter-dependence between citizen participation and institutional accountability: Lessons from Mexico’s rural municipal funds,’ in K. Peister, ed., Thinking Out Loud: Innovative Case Studies on Participation Instruments. Washington: World Bank, Latin America and Caribbean Region Civil Society Papers, 2000.Google Scholar
  34. Fox, J. ( 2001, forthcoming). `Los flujos y reflujos de prestamos sociales y ambientales del Banco Mundial en México’ [’The rise and fall of the World Bank’s social and environmental lending to Mexico] in A. Alvarez Béjar, N. Klahn, F. Manchon and P. Castillo, eds., Las nuevas fronteras del siglo XXI: Dimensiones culturales, politicos y socioeconómicas de las relaciones MexicoEstados Unidos. Mexico City: UNAM/La Jornada Ediciones.Google Scholar
  35. Fox, J. and J. Aranda (1996). Decentralization and Rural Development in Mexico: Community Participation in Oaxaca’s Municipal Funds. La Jolla: UCSD, Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
  36. Fox, J. and L.D. Brown, eds. (1998). The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs and Grassroots Movements. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Fox, J. and J. Gershman (1999). `Investing in social capital? Comparative lessons from ten World Bank rural development projects in Mexico and the Philippines,’ paper presented at the World Bank, November 4.Google Scholar
  38. George, S. and F. Sabelli (1994). Faith and Credit: The World Bank’s Secular Empire. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  39. Grootaert, C. (1997). `Social capital: The missing link?’ in Expanding the Measure of Wealth: Indicators of Environmentally Sustainable Development. Washington: World Bank, Environmentally Sustainable Development Studies and Monographs, Series No. 17, June, pp. 77–93.Google Scholar
  40. Harriss, J. and P. DeRenzio (1997). ‘An introductory bibliographic essay,’ Journal of International Development 9 (7): 919–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Henriquez, E. (1999). `Millionario programa productivo en zonas de influencia zapatista,’ La Jornada June 29.Google Scholar
  42. Ibarra, E. (1999). `Evaluación externa, 1997: Programa de desarrollo productivo sustenable de la huasteca veracruzana,’ Mexico City: Instituto Nacional de Capacitacion del Sector Agropecuario.Google Scholar
  43. Korten, F.F. and R.Y. Siy Jr., eds. (1989). Transforming a Bureaucracy: The Experience of the Philippine National Irrigation Administration. Manila: Ateneo de Manila Press.Google Scholar
  44. Lowerre, R. (1994). `1994 update to `evaluation of the forest development project of the World Bank in the sierra madre occidental in Chihuahua and Durango, Mexico,’ Austin: Texas Center for Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  45. Mahoney, S. and C. Monico (1999). ‘Assessment of participatory approaches in the identification of World Bank projects,’ Washington: InterAction.Google Scholar
  46. Martinez, J. et al. (1995a). ‘Memoria: primer taller de la zona norte — programa de capacitacion para el desarrollo de los pueblos indigenas forestales de Mexico del 20 a; 30 de Marzo, 1995,’ Mexico: Comunidad Indigena Nvo. San Juan Paragaricutiro/World Bank Institutional Development Fund.Google Scholar
  47. Martinez, J. (1995b). `Memoria: segundo taller de la zona sur — programa de capacitacion para el desarrollo de los pueblos indigenas forestales de Mexico del 20 a; 30 de Agosto, 1995 — UZACHI — UCFAS,’ Mexico: Comunidad Indigena Nvo. San Juan Paragaricutiro/World Bank Institutional Development Fund.Google Scholar
  48. Mosley, P., J. Harrigan and J. Toye, eds. (1991). Aid and Power: The World Bank and Policy-Based Lending. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Miller-Adams, M. (1999). The World Bank: New Agendas in a Changing World. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nelson, P. (1995). The World Bank and Non-Governmental Organizations: The Limits of Apolitical Development. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Operations Evaluation Department (1996). Irrigation Sector Review. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  52. Operations Evaluation Department (1999). Nongovernmental Organizations in World Bank-Supported Projects: A Review. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  53. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paré, L., D. Bray, J. Burstein and S. Martinez Vazquez, eds. (1997). Semillas para el Cambio en el Campo: Medio Ambiente, Mercados y Organización Campesina. Mexico City: IIS/UNAM/Saldebas.Google Scholar
  55. Purcell, M. and C. Heredia (1997). `The wrong path: The World Bank’s country assistance strategy for Mexico,’ Development in Practice 7 (2): May.Google Scholar
  56. Quizon, A.B. (1997). `Country report: Philippines,’ Manila: Asian Development Bank, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  57. Rangel, G. (1999). `El sentido de la participacion social en el proyecto de desarollo rural en areas marginadas o del enredado mundo de los proyectos del desarrollo rural en Mexico,’ Escuela Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Undergraduate Thesis, April.Google Scholar
  58. Royo, A. (1998). ‘Against the peoples’ wishes: The Mt. Apo Story,’ in J. Fox and L.D. Brown, eds., The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs, and Social Movements. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 151–179.Google Scholar
  59. Salazar, H. and S. Whizar, eds. (1996). La Ac\uicultura en el Desarrollo Regional: Memorias de los Talleres Regionales, Sinaloa and Oaxaca. Mexico City: Desarrollo, Ambiente y Sociedad/Fundación Friedrich Ebert.Google Scholar
  60. Sanchez, S.L. et al. (1998). ‘Evaluacion general del program de desarrollo sustentable en las regiones mixe, mazateca y cuicateca del estado de oaxaca, 1997,’ Oaxaca: Gobierno del Estado de Oaxaca, Secretaria de Agricultura, Ganaderia y Desarrollo Rural, Jubileo.Google Scholar
  61. Subsecretaria de Desarrollo Rural (1998). Manual de Procedimientos de Operación: Programa de Desarrollo Productivo Sostenible en Zonas Rurales Marginadas. Mexico: Secretaria de Agricultura y Ganaderia.Google Scholar
  62. Subsecretaria de Recursos Naturales (1999). `Proyecto de conservación y manejo sustentable de recursos forestales en Mexico: Informe 1998,’ Mexico: Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.Google Scholar
  63. Thorne, E. (1998). `The politics of policy compliance: The World Bank and the social dimensions of development,’ Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT Political Science Department.Google Scholar
  64. Trasparencia (1998). `Seguimiento al programa de desarrollo productivo en zonas rurales marginadas del estado de veracruz,’ Mexico City, unpublished ms.Google Scholar
  65. Trasparencia (1999). `Intercambio de Experiencias sobre el Proyecto “Desarollo Rural en Areas Marginadas: Oaxaca de Juarez, 18–19 de Febrero, 1999”,’ Oaxaca: Trasparencia.Google Scholar
  66. Urzúa, C. (1997). `Five decades of relations between the World Bank and Mexico,’ in D. Kapur, J.P. Lewis and R. Webb, eds., The World Bank–Its First Half Century, Volume Two: Perspectives. Washington: The Brookings Institution, pp. 49–108.Google Scholar
  67. Velasquez, M.C. (1996). `Proyecto “Desarrollo Sostenible en Zonas Rurales Marginadas” (Banco Mundial): Aciertos y desaciertos para promover la participation en las etapas de identification y prepapracion del proyecto en Oaxaca,’ Oaxaca: Trasparencia, unpublished ms.Google Scholar
  68. Wade, R. (1997). `Greening the bank: The struggle over the environment, 1970–1995,’ in D. Kapur, J.P. Lewis and R. Webb, eds., The World Bank–Its First Half Century, Volume Two: Perspectives. Washington: The Brookings Institution, pp. 611–734.Google Scholar
  69. Werksman, J., ed. (1996). Greening International Institutions. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  70. Wexler, M. and D. Bray (1996). `Reforming forests: From community forests to corporate forestry in Mexico,’ in L. Randall, ed., Reforming Mexico’s Agrarian Reform. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 235–246.Google Scholar
  71. Whizar, S., H. Salazar and R. Gonzalez Franco (1995). `Sustainable aquaculture? The World Bank’s proposed Mexico aquaculture project,’ Washington: Greenpeace, September [in translation, original memo from Mexico City, September, 1995 ].Google Scholar
  72. Woolcock, M. (1998). `Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework,’ Theory and Society 27 (2): 151–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Woolcock, M. and D. Narayan (2000, forthcoming). `Social capital: Implications for development theory, research and policy,’ World Bank Research Observer 15 (2): 225–250.Google Scholar
  74. World Bank (1994a). Making Development Sustainable: The World Bank Group and the Environment, Fiscal 1994. Washington: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. World Bank (1994b). `Mexico rainfed areas development project,’ Washington: World Bank, Staff Appraisal Report No. 12533-ME, June 15.Google Scholar
  76. World Bank (1995a). `Mexico resource conservation and forest sector review,’ Washington: World Bank, Report No. 13114-ME, March 31.Google Scholar
  77. World Bank (1995b). `Mexico rural financial markets.’ Washington: World Bank, Report No. 14599-ME, August 25.Google Scholar
  78. World Bank (1995c). Mainstreaming the Environment: The World Bank Group and the Environment Since the Rio Earth Summit, Fiscal 1995. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  79. World Bank (1995d). `Implementation completion report - Mexico forest development project,’ Washington: World Bank Report No. 14625, June 2.Google Scholar
  80. World Bank (1996a). The World Bank Participation Sourcebook. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  81. World Bank (1996b). `Philippines agrarian reform communities development project,’ Washington: World Bank, Staff Appraisal Report No. 15624-PH, October 24.Google Scholar
  82. World Bank (1997a). `Mexico community forestry project,’ Washington: World Bank, Staff Appraisal Report No. 16134-ME, January 21.Google Scholar
  83. World Bank (1997b). `Mexico aquaculture development project,’ Washington: World Bank, Staff Appraisal Report No. 16476-ME, March 28.Google Scholar
  84. World Bank (1997c). `Mexico rural development in marginal areas project,’ Washington: World Bank Project Appraisal Document, Report No. 17263-ME, December 23.Google Scholar
  85. World Bank (1997d). World Development Report. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
  86. World Bank (1999). Assessing Aid. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Fox
    • 1
  • John Gershman
    • 2
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA
  2. 2.University of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations