Advertisement

Indigenous knowledge as intellectual property

  • Charles H. Norchi
Chapter

Abstract

The traditional Onge people of the Indian Nicobar and Andaman Islands in the Bay of Bengal possess important indigenous knowledge and thus are attracting the intense interest of northern multinational corporations and associated wealth elites. Indigenous knowledge spans medicine, biology, and ecology and holds great wealth-maximizing potential. There is a strong public purpose interest in greater community access to indigenous knowledge-derived products, especially pharmaceuticals. The public purpose goals are best achieved by policies which preserve Onge social organization, and which protect the group’s rights by insuring that key decisions about the disposition of its indigenous knowledge are left in its control. A critical factor in policy design is the Onge reservoir of social capital including customary law features.

Keywords

Social Capital Intellectual Property Indigenous People Indigenous Knowledge Indigenous Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brush, S. B. and D. Stabinsky (1996). Valuing Local Knowledge. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brush, S. B. (1994). ‘A non-market approach to protecting biological resources,’ in T. Greaves, ed., Intellectual Property Rights for Indigenous Peoples, A Sourcebook.Google Scholar
  3. Capriani, L. (1966). The Andaman Islanders. Washington: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Gandhi, I. (1982). Address before the World Health Assembly, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  5. Greaves, T. (1994). Intellectual Property Rights for Indigenous Peoples, a Sourcebook. Kothari, A. (1995). `Who will India protect tribal biodiversity laws?’ Seedling.Google Scholar
  6. Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A Pre-View of Policy Sciences. New York: Elsevier Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Malinowski, B. (1954). Magic, Science and Religion. New York: Anchor Books. Patents Act of India, Act 39 of 1970.Google Scholar
  8. Radcliffe-Brown, A. (1922). The Andaman Islanders. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  9. Reisman, W. M. (1993). ‘Autonomy, interdependence, and responsibility,’ Yale Law Journal 103, 401–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Reisman, W. M. (1999). Law in Brief Encounters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Simpson, T. (1997). Indigenous Heritage and Self-Determination, The Cultural and Intellectual Property Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Copenhagen: International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs.Google Scholar
  12. Venkateswar, S. (1999). `The Andaman Islanders,’ Scientific American.Google Scholar
  13. Weber, G. (1999). Unpublished manuscript, Andamanese Islands Association.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles H. Norchi
    • 1
  1. 1.International Security StudiesYale UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations