Enhancing Risk Management by Focusing on the Local Level: An Integrated Approach

  • June Fessenden-Raden
  • Carole A. Bisogni
  • Keith S. Porter
Part of the Advances in Risk Analysis book series (AIRA, volume 5)


An integrated approach to risk management that focuses on the local level will lead to a more satisfactory and timely resolution of localized risk situations such as chemical contamination of groundwater that serves as a source of drinking water. More importantly this approach will result in additional positive long-range effects — increased local capabilities to deal with future chemical risk problems and improved prevention of some types of chemical contamination of groundwater. Conceptualizing the management of risks as having inputs (the risk situation, laws and policies, technical context, and community context), process, and outcomes illustrates that neither outside intervenors nor the local community should approach a risk situation without regard for all of the inputs or without understanding the dynamics of the process of managing risks at the local level.

Key Words

Risk management community response groundwater chemical contamination drinking water quality 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Fitchen, Janet M., 1986, “The Importance of Community Context in Effective Risks Management” this volume.Google Scholar
  2. Fitchen, Janet M., Jenifer S. Heath and June Fessenden-Raden, forthcoming, “Risk Perception in Community Context: A Case Study,” to be published in a volume entitled The Social Construct of Risk edited by Branden Johnson and Vincent Covello.Google Scholar
  3. Gillespie, A. H. and Paul Yarborough, 1984, “A Model for Communicating Nutrition,” J. Nutrition Education 16(4):168.Google Scholar
  4. Heath, Jenifer S. and June Fessenden-Raden, 1986, “The Relationship Between Risk Management Intervenors and the Community,” this volume.Google Scholar
  5. Hughes, Bonney F. and Carole A. Bisogni, 1986, “Citizens’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Actions Regarding Chemical Contamination of Drinking Water,” this volume.Google Scholar
  6. Hughes, Henry B.F., 1986, “Incorporating Technical Information and Community Goals into Risk Management Decisions Related to Groundwater,” this volume.Google Scholar
  7. Hughes, Henry B.F., Keith S. Porter, et al., 1982, “Reclamation of a Groundwater Supply: Clifton Springs, NY,” Center for Environmental Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  8. Lemley, A.T., J. Fessenden-Raden, C.A. Bisogni, and J.M. Holway, 1985, “Nitrate Contamination: Public Awareness,” J. Amer. Water Works 77:34–39-Google Scholar
  9. Pacenka, Steven and Keith S. Porter, 1981, “Preliminary Regional Assessment of the Environmental Fate of the Potato Pesticide AldicarbGoogle Scholar
  10. Eastern Long Island, New York,“ Center for Environmental Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  11. Steenhuis, Tammo, 1985, “Pollutant Transport Process in Soil and Groundwater” (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  12. Starr, Chauncey, 1985, “Risk Management, Assessment, and Acceptability,” Risk Analysis 5:97–102.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • June Fessenden-Raden
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carole A. Bisogni
    • 1
    • 3
  • Keith S. Porter
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Division of Biological SciencesInstitute of Comparative and Environmental ToxicologyUSA
  3. 3.Division of Nutritional SciencesInstitute of Comparative and Environmental ToxicologyUSA
  4. 4.Water Resources InstituteCenter for Environmental ResearchUSA

Personalised recommendations