Abstract
The rational management of health and environmental risks ideally requires a well defined structured approach in order that risk may be dealt with in a complete and equitable fashion. In this paper, formal models of the process of risk assessment and risk management which have been proposed in the literature in recent years are reviewed. Common elements amongst these models are identified, and the potential impact of these approaches on practical decision making is examined.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Advisory Council on Occupational Health and Occupational Safety (1985). Advisory Memorandum 85-I, Criteria and Alternative Approaches for the Control of Hazardous Substances and Agents in the Workplace, Part I: Identification of Criteria, Ontario.
Davis, J. C. (1983). Science and policy in risk control. In: Risk Management of Existing Chemicals. Chemical Manufacturer’s Association, Government Institutes, pp. 13–21.
Interdepartmental Working Group on Risk-Benefit Analysis (1984). Risk-Benefit Analysis in the Management of Toxic Chemicals. Agriculture Canada, Ottawa.
Kaplan, S. & Garrick, B.J. (1981). On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis 1: 11–28.
Krewski, D., Clayson, D., & McCullough, R.S. (1982). Identification and measurement of Risk. In: Living with Risk: Environmental Risk Management in Canada. ( I. Burton, C.D. Fowle & R.S. McCullough, eds). Institute for Environmental Studies, Toronto, pp. 7–23.
Lave, L.B. (ed) (1982). Quantitative Risk Assessment in Regulation. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.
National Research Council, Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risks to Public Health (1983). Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 196–203.
Rodricks, J.V. and Tardiff, R.G. (1984). Conceptual basis for risk assessment. In: Assessment and Management of Chemical Risks. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., pp. 1–12.
Royal Society Study Group (1983). Risk Assessment: A Study Group Report. Royal Society, London., pp. 22–23, 149–184.
Ruckelshaus, W.D. (1983). Science, risk and public policy. Science 221: 1026–1028.
Shrader-Frechette, K.S. (1985). Risk Analysis and Scientific Method. D. Reidal Publishing, Boston., pp. 15–48.
Torrance, G. & Krewski, D. (1985). Economic evaluation of toxic chemical control programs. Submitted.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (1984). Risk Assessment and Management: Framework for Decision Making. EPA 600/9–85–002, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Whyte, A.V. & Burton, I. (eds) (1980). Environmental Risk Assessment. Wiley, New York., pp. 10–14.
World Health Organization, Working Group on Health and the Environment (1984). Risk Assessment and Its Use in the Decision Making Process for Chemical Control. ICP/RCE 903(28), World Health Organization, Geneva.
World Health Organization (1985). Risk Management in Chemical Safety. ICP/CEH 506/m01 56881. World Health Organization, European Regional Program on Chemical Safety, Geneva.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krewski, D., Birkwood, P.L. (1987). Risk Assessment and Risk Management: A Survey of Recent Models. In: Lave, L.B. (eds) Risk Assessment and Management. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 5. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6443-7_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6443-7_39
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-6445-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-6443-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive