Advertisement

The Nuclear Industry

  • William M. Eister
  • Warren K. Eister

Abstract

The objective of the nuclear industry is to produce energy in the forms of heat and radiation. For heat applications, the nuclear fuel has a very high specific energy content that has two principal uses, for military explosives and for electricity generation. For radiation applications the emissions from radioactive decay of unstable nuclides are employed in research, medicine, and industry for diagnostic purposes and for chemical reaction initiation.

Keywords

Fission Product Fuel Cycle Spend Fuel Nuclear Industry Natural Uranium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Status and Outlook

  1. 1.
    Finger, H., “Need for Nuclear Energy, National Energy Strategy Hearings,” US Council for Energy Awareness, Washington, DC, 1989.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nuclear Electricity for September 1990,“ Nucleonics Week,45, NY, Nov. 8, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reactor Safety Study, WASH 1400 (NUREG 75/014) US Regulatory Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 1975.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Fuel Cycle Evaluation, INFCE/PC/2/9. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1980.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10 Energy, Chapter 1 Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    The Accident at Three Mile Island,“ Staff Report to the President’s Commission, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC, 1979.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Accident-Health and Environmental Consequences,“ DOE/ER-0332 US Department of Energy, June 1987.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Uranium Resources, Production and Demand, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and International Atomic Energy Agency, Paris, 1990.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Annual Report to Congress 1988, Energy Information Administration, Washington DC, 20585, 1989.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Annual Energy Review 1988, DOE/EIA-0384[88], Energy Information Adminstration, Washington DC, 20585.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Energy Efficiency,“ The Energy Daily,18, 64, Washington DC, 1990.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parent, J. D., A Survey of United States and Total World Production, Reserves and Remaining Recoverable Fossil Fuel and Uranium, Institute of Gas Technology, Chicago, IL, 1977.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Friedlander, G., Kennedy, J., Macias, E., Miller, J., Nuclear and Radiochemistry, 3rd Ed, J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nuclides and Isotopes,14th Ed, 202–637–4000 GE Nuclear Operations, 175 Curtner Ave., M/C397, San Jose, CA, 95125.Google Scholar

Radioisotope Decay

  1. 15.
    A Status Report on Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion, STU/PUB/872 International Fusion Research Council, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. 16.
    Starpower, the U.S. and the International Quest for Fusion Energy, OTA-E-338, Office of Technology Assessment, Congress of the United States, Oct. 1987.Google Scholar
  3. 17.
    Kauffman, G., “Beyond Uranium, Chemical and Engineering News,” 47, Washington, DC, Nov. 1990.Google Scholar
  4. 18.
    Crandall, J., “The Savannah River High Flux Demonstration, USAEC Report DP999,” US Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  5. 19.
    Lagunas-Solar, M., “Cyclotron Production of No-Carrier-Added Medical Radionuclides,” 7th Conference on the Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry, Denton TX, 1982.Google Scholar
  6. 20.
    Meyer, W., and Plascjak, P., Cyclotron Group, National Institute of Health-personal communication.Google Scholar
  7. 21.
    Stable Isotopes for Research and Industry, ISOTEC, Maimisburg OH 45342, 1990.Google Scholar
  8. 22.
    Separation and Applications of Stable Isotopes, Avona and Spicer, American Laboratory, April 1987.Google Scholar
  9. 23.
    Separation of Hydrogen Isotopes,“ Rae, H.,Editor, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1978.Google Scholar
  10. 24.
    Fuel Cycle Review 1990, Nuclear Engineering International.Google Scholar
  11. 25.
    Eister, W., Stoughton, R., Sullivan, W., Processing of Nuclear Reactor Fuel, Principles of Nuclear Reactor Engineering, Glasstone, S., ( Ed. ), Van Nostrand, NY, 1955.Google Scholar
  12. 26.
    Leist, N., “The Benefication and Refining of Uranium Concentrates,” NLCO 1067, US Atomic Energy Commission, 1970.Google Scholar

Fuel Production

  1. 27.
    Mantz, E., “Production of Uranium Tetrafluoride and Uranium Metal,” USAEC Report NCLO 1068, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, 1970.Google Scholar
  2. 28.
    U.S. Uranium Enrichment, The Case for Restructuring, The council for Energy Awareness, Washington, DC, 1988.Google Scholar
  3. 29.
    Olander, D., “The Gas Centrifuge,” Scientific American, V. 239, No. 2, 1978.Google Scholar
  4. 30.
    Long, J., Engineering for Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing,Gordon and Breach, New York.Google Scholar
  5. 31.
    Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange,Logsdail, D., et al., J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
  6. 32.
    Integrated Data base for 1989: Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Inventories,“ Department of Energy, Washington DC, 20585, 1989.Google Scholar
  7. 33.
    Dry Storage Casks for Spent Nuclear Fuel,“ Journal of the Institute of Nuclear Materials Management,Northbrook, IL, 60062, May 1990.Google Scholar
  8. 34.
    Annual Report to Congress, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, U.S. Department of Energy, washington, DC, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. 35.
    Environmental Assessment of Remedial Action at the Monument Valley Uranium Mill Tailings Site, Monument Valley, AZ, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 1989.Google Scholar
  10. 36.
    Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action Program, Annual Report, 1989, Washington, DC, 1989.Google Scholar
  11. 37.
    Eister, W., “Materials Considerations in Radioactive Waste Storage,” p. 6, Nuclear Technology, 1, Jan. 1977.Google Scholar
  12. 38.
    Rail Transportation Corridor Analysis, BMI/ONWI-617, U.S. Department of Energy, 1986.Google Scholar
  13. 39.
    Transporting Spent Nuclear Fuel, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Washington, DC, 1986.Google Scholar
  14. 40.
    Benedict, M., Pigford, T., Levi, Nuclear Chemical Engineering,McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  15. 41.
    Nuclear Reactors and Technology,“ Monthly Abstracts, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN.Google Scholar
  16. 42.
    International Comparison of LWR Performance,“ Beckjord, E., et al., Report MIT EL 87–004, Masschusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, Feb. 1989.Google Scholar
  17. 43.
    Frost, B., Nuclear Fuel Elements, Pergamon Press, New York, 1982.Google Scholar
  18. 44.
    Cohen Water Coolant Technology of Power Reactors,Gordon and Breach, 1969.Google Scholar
  19. 45.
    Advanced LWRs, Nuclear Industries, July 1988, U.S. Council for Energy Awareness, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  20. 46.
    A Catalogue of Advanced Fuel Cycles in CANDU-PHW Reactors,Veeder and Didsbury, Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada, KOJ 1.10, 1985.Google Scholar
  21. 47.
    Till, C., Chang, Y., “The Integral Fast Reactor,” Advances in Nuclear Science, 20, 1988.Google Scholar
  22. 48.
    Glasstone, S., The Effects of Nuclear Weapons, U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977.Google Scholar
  23. 49.
    Eister, W., et al., Radiopharmaceuticals and Short-Lived Radioisotopes, Radioisotope Production Study, ASao Paulo, Brazil, IAEA-124, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1970.Google Scholar
  24. 50.
    Eister, W., et al., Radioisotope Production in the U.S., (see above).Google Scholar
  25. 51.
    Eister, W., et al., Radioisotope Generators America, (see above).Google Scholar
  26. 52.
    Eichholz, G., Radioisotope Engineering, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
  27. 53.
    Machine Sources for Food Irradiation,“ U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 1988.Google Scholar
  28. 54.
    Handbook of Isotopic Power Source Characteristics, Arnold, ORNL 3576, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge TN, 1964.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • William M. Eister
    • 1
  • Warren K. Eister
    • 2
  1. 1.Oconee Nuclear Power StationDuke Power CompanyUSA
  2. 2.Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the U.S. Department of EnergyUSA

Personalised recommendations