High-Energy Processes in Crystals: Radiation, Pair Creation, Photon Splitting and Pion Creation

  • J. C. Kimball
  • N. Cue
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 165)


In the three years since we suggested that an aligned crystal could significantly enhance the electron-positron pair-creation rate,1 considerable progress has been made in understanding the special role a crystal plays in quantum electrodynamics (QED) at GeV energies. Theoretical work by several groups have shown that both radiation and pair creation are most simply described by viewing the crystal as a source of large and effectively homogeneous electric fields.2,3,4,5 This “uniform-field approximation” gives qualitatively reasonable results when the crystal axis is in nearly perfect alignment with a beam of incident particles (electrons, positrons, or photons). The success of the uniform-field approximation is a consequence of the large mass enhancement of electrons and positrons with GeV energies. The motion of these leptons in the plane transverse to the aligned crystal axis can be accurately described by a nonrelativistic Schrödinger equation for a particle with a relativistically enhanced mass,6 and the large mass allows us to describe particle trajectories classically. The general agreement between theory and experimental data on high-energy radiation and “crystal-enhanced” pair creation is quite satisfactory. A review of the experimental results, and the appropriate references are given in the paper by A. Belkacem et al. in this volume.


Momentum Transfer Incident Photon Crystal Axis Incident Photon Energy Pair Creation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. C. Kimball, N. Cue, L. M. Roth, and B. B. Marsh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50: 950 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. C. Kimball and N. Cue, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52: 1747 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. C. Kimball and N. Cue, Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B2: 25 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. N. Baier, V. M. Katkov, and V. M. Strakhovenko, Phys. Lett. 104A: 231 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. N. Baier, V. M. Katkov, and V. M. Strakhovenko, Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B4: 364 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. C. Kimball and N. Cue, Phys. Rept. C 125: 69 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Belkacem et al., to appear in Phys. Lett.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. L. Adler, Ann. Phys. (NY) 67: 599 (1971).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Überall, Phys. Rev. 103:1055 (1956); 107: 223 (1957).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Diambrini-Palazzi, Rev. Mod. Phys. 40: 611 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. Segre, “Nuclei and Particles, 2nd Edition,” Benjamin, Reading (1977).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. B. Barestetskii, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii, “Relativistic Quantum Theory, Part 1,” Pergamon, New York (1971), p. 180.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pedersen, J. U. Andersen, and E. Bonderup, Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B13: 27 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. D. Jackson, “Classical Electrodynamics”, 2nd Edition, Wiley, New York, (1975), p. 660.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. Primakoff, Phys. Rev. 81: 899 (1951).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. G. Landsberg, Phys. Rep. 128: 301 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. Belletini, et al., Nuovo Cimento 40A: 1139 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D. S. Gemmell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46: 153 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. C. Kimball and N. Cue, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57: 1935 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. C. Kimball
    • 1
  • N. Cue
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentState University of New York at AlbanyAlbanyUSA

Personalised recommendations