Advertisement

The Composition of Bank Councils for Heterogeneous Monetary Unions

  • Jürgen von Hagen
Part of the ZEI Studies in European Economics and Law book series (ZEIS, volume 1)

Abstract

A principal task of a central bank constitution for monetary unions is to distribute the power over monetary policy between the center and the individual member states. The balance of power between the center and the states matters because, even in the absence of a central government, two different perspectives of monetary policy exist in a monetary union: One that takes union-wide aggregates of output, employment, and prices as the relevant targets of union monetary policy, and one that takes regional or national aggregates as targets and makes monetary policy actions dependent on regional or national idiosyncrasies and country-specific shocks. Furthermore, the balance matters because monetary policy makers from different regions may have different views regarding monetary policy as well as views that differ from those of the central administration. For examples, voting patterns of FOMC members (Chappell et al 1993, Havrilesky et al 1990, 1993) and members of the German Bundesbank Council (Lohmann, 1994; Vaubel, 1991) suggest that the views on optimal policy actions can differ widely between council members appointed by the federal government and those representing the district or state central banks, as well as among the district or state representatives.

Keywords

Monetary Policy Central Bank Monetary Union Debt Ratio European Monetary Union 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alesina, Alberto. (1988) “Macroeconomics and politics.” in Stanley Fischer (ed) NBER Macroeconomics Annual, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alesina, Alberto. and Vittorio Grilli. (1993) “On the feasibility of a one or multispeed European monetary union.” Economics and Politics 5, 145–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alesina, Alberto. and Lawrence H. Summers. (1993) “Central bank independence and macroeconomic performance: some comparative evidence.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 25, 151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aufricht, Hans. (1965) Comparative survey of central bank law. London: Stevens & Sons.Google Scholar
  5. Barro, Robert J. (1983) “Inflationary finance under discretion and rules.” Canadian Journal of Economics 16, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barro, Robert J., and David B. Gordon. (1983) “A positive theory of monetary policy in a natural rate model.” Journal of Political Economy 91, 589–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchanan, James M. and Gordon Tullock. (1965) The calculus of consent. Ann Arbor Paperbacks edition, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  8. Casella, Alessandra. (1992) “Participation in a currency union.” American Economic Review 82, 847–63.Google Scholar
  9. Chappell, Henry, Thomas Havrilesky, and Rob McGregor. (1993) “Partisan monetary policies: presidential influence through the power of appointment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (1), 185–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cramer, Helmut. (1966) Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton: Princeton University Press (11th ed.).Google Scholar
  11. Cukierman, Alex. (1992) Central banking - strategy, credibility, and independence. Theory and evidence. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Eichengreen, Barry. (1990) “One money for Europe? Lessons from the US currency union.” Economic Policy 10, 118–87.Google Scholar
  13. Fratianni, Michele, Jürgen von Hagen, and Christopher Waller. (1997) “Central banking as a political principal-agent problem.” Economic Inquiry, 35, 378–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedman, Milton, and Anna J. Schwartz. (1963) A monetary history of the United States, 1867–1960. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Geisler, Rudolf P. (1953) Notenbankverfassung und Notenbankentwicklung in USA und Westdeutschland. Berlin: Duncker und HumblotGoogle Scholar
  16. Gildea, J. (1990) “Explaining FOMC members’ votes” in Thomas Mayer (ed.) The political economy of American monetary policy. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Giovannini, Alberto. (1993) “Central banking in a monetary union: reflections on the proposed statute of the European Central Bank.” in Allan H. Meltzer and Charles I. Plosser (eds) Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 38, Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  18. Goodfriend, Marvin. (1993) “Central banking in a monetary union: reflections on the proposed statute of the European Central Bank - a comment.” in Allan H. Meltzer and Charles I. Plosser (eds) Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 38, Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  19. Graboyes, R. F. (1990) “A Yankee recipe for a Eurofed omelet.”. The Wall Street JournallEurope August 1.Google Scholar
  20. Hahn, Oswald. (1968) Die Währungsbanken dieser Welt. Vol. 1 and 2, Stuttgart: C.E. Poeschel.Google Scholar
  21. Hammond, George. (1993) “Regional effects of US monetary policy.” working paper, Indiana University School of Business.Google Scholar
  22. Havrilesky, Thomas, Henry Chappell, John Gildea, and Rob McGregor. (1993) “Congress threatens the Fed.” Challenge 36, 50–57.Google Scholar
  23. Havrilesky, Thomas, and Robert Schweitzer. (1990) “A theory of FOMC dissent voting with evidence from the time series.” in: Thomas Mayer (ed.), The political economy of American monetary policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lohmann, Susanne. (1992) “Optimal commitment in monetary policy: credibility versus flexibility.” American Economic Review 82, 273–86.Google Scholar
  25. Lohmann, Susanne. (1994) “Designing a central bank in a federal system: The Deutsche Bundesbank, 1957–92.” in Pierre Syklos (ed), Varieties of Monetary Reforms: Lessons and Experiences on the Road to Monetary Union. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Persson, Torsten, and Guido Tabellini. (1993) “Designing institutions for monetary stability.” Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39, 53–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rawls, John. (1971) A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rogoff, Kenneth. (1985) “The optimal degree of commitment to an intermediate target.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 100, 1169–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rogoff, Kenneth. and Anne Sibert. (1988) “Elections and macroeconomic cycles.” Review of Economic Studies 55, 1–16.Google Scholar
  30. Sacerdoti, E. (1991) “Central bank operations and independence in a monetary union: BCEAO and BEAC.” in Patrick Downes and Reza Vaez-Zadeh (eds), The evolving role of central banks. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  31. Temin, Peter. (1969) The Jacksonian economy. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  32. Vaubel, Roland. (1991) “Die Deutsche Bundesbank als Modell für eine Europäische Zentralbank? Eine Public Choice Analyse.” University of Mannheim, mimeo.Google Scholar
  33. von Hagen, Jürgen, and Ralph Süppel. (1994) “Central bank constitutions for federal monetary unions.” European Economic Review 38, 774–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Waller, Christopher J. (1992a) “The choice of a conservative central banker in a multisector economy.” American Economic Review 82, 1006–12.Google Scholar
  35. Waller, Christopher J. (1992b) “A bargaining model of partisan appointments to the central bank.” Journal of Monetary Economics 29(3), 411–28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jürgen von Hagen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.ZEIUniversity of BonnGermany
  2. 2.Indiana UniversityUSA
  3. 3.CEPRLondonUK

Personalised recommendations