Prevention of antisocial behavior in high-risk boys

The Montreal longitudinal and experimental study
  • René Carbonneau
  • Frank Vitaro
  • Richard E. Tremblay


It has been well established that disruptive behavior during early school years increases the risk for later antisocial behavior1. In order to change the course of disruptive behavior, interventions should aim at modifying the different sources of influence that affect the development of antisocial behavior. Current developmental theories suggest that parental practices and children’s social skills should be considered essential components of any intervention effort that aims to prevent antisocial behavior in high-risk children2. The Montreal Longitudinal and Experimental Study (MLES) included a multi-component prevention program aiming at preventing delinquency and social maladjustment in high-risk boys3. This chapter briefly describes the MLES prevention program, and reviews some of the positive short-term and long-term effects on various aspects of the boys’ psychosocial adjustment.


Antisocial Behavior Disruptive Behavior Training Parent Regular Class Parental Supervision 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Tremblay, R.E., Pihl, R.O., Vitaro, F. & Dobkin, P.L., 1994, Predicting early onset of male antisocial behavior from preschool behavior. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 732 - 739.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coie, J.D., 1996, Prevention of violence and antisocial behavior. In Preventing childhood disorders, substance abuse, and del inquency (R.D.V. Peters & R.J. MacMahon.) Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 1 - 18.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tremblay, R.E., Vitaro, F., Bertrand, L., Le Blanc, M., Beauchesne, H., Boileau, H.. and David, H., 1992, Parent and child training to prevent early onset of delinquency: The Monrteal longitudinal-experimental study. In Preventing antisocial behavior: Interventions from birth through adolescence ( J. McCord et RE,. Tremblay eds.), Guilford Press, New-York, pp. 117 - 138.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tremblay, R.E., Loeber, R., Gagnon, C., Charlebois, P., Larivée, S. & LeBlanc, M.. 1991, Disruptive boys with stable and unstable high fighting patterns during elementary school. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 19: 285 - 300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patterson, G.R., 1982, Coercive family process. Castalia Press, Eugene, OR.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tremblay, RE., Pagani-Kurtz, L, Masse, L., Vitaro, F., Pihl, R.O., 1995, A bimodal preventive intervention for disruptive kindergarten boys: Its impact through mid-adolescence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 63: 560 - 568.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • René Carbonneau
    • 1
    • 2
  • Frank Vitaro
    • 2
  • Richard E. Tremblay
    • 2
  1. 1.School of CriminologyUniversity of MontrealMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Research Unit on Children's Psychosocial MaladjustmentUniversity of MontrealMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations