Advertisement

Soot Oxidation in Flames

  • K. G. Neoh
  • J. B. Howard
  • A. F. Sarofim

Abstract

The kinetics and mechanisms of soot oxidation were studied at temperatures of 1575 to 1865 K and O2 mole fractions of 10−5 to 0.05 in a two-stage atmospheric-pressure combustion system in which soot-laden gas from a primary flame was partially cooled, mixed with oxygen-containing gas, and burned in a downstream premixed flame. The rate of oxidation of soot was measured using light scattering and absorption techniques to determine the particle size and concentration of soot as a function of distance, and hence of time, in the secondary flame. Complementary measurements of soot particle size were performed using probe sampling, electron microscopy, and electrical mobility analysis, and the specific surface area of the soot at different stages of burnout was measured by the BET technique. Temperature and gas composition profiles in the secondary flame were determined using coated thermocouples with electrical compensation for radiation loss, chromatographic analysis of sampled stable gases, and a spectroscopic technique combined with partial equilibrium calculations for radical species. It was found that OH radical is the principal oxidant of soot under these conditions, with O2 being of secondary importance. The average value of the collision efficiency of OH with soot is found to be 0.28 if the optical (equivalent sphere) diameter of the soot aggregates is used in the calculations, or about 0.13 if the diameter of the individual spherical units within the aggregates is used. The actual value of the collision efficiency is expected to be bounded by these two values. The results indicate that soot burnout rates predicted from the Nagle and Strickland-Constable formula, which assumes O2 to be the oxidant, are drastically underestimated under fuel-rich flame conditions owing to the neglect of the OH contribution. Breakup of soot aggregates during burnout was observed under fuel lean conditions.

Keywords

Soot Particle Diffusion Flame Soot Oxidation Collision Efficiency Soot Aggregate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Nagle, and R. F. Strickland-Constable, Proc% of the Fifth Carbon Conf: l (1962), p. 154.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. E. Rosner, and H. D. Allendo,f; AIAA Journal, Vol. 6 (1968), p. 650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    F. J. Wright, “Fifteenth Symposium ( International) on Combustion,” The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, (1975), p. 1449.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Park, and J. P. Appleton, Combustion and Flame, Vol. 20 (1973), p. 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Otterbein, and L. Bonnetain, Carbon, Vol. 7 (1969), P. 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. R. Walls, and R. F. Strickland-Constable, Carbon, Vol. 1 (1964), p. 33.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. R. Glander, W. Siekhaus, R. Jones and J. A. Schwarz, J. Chem. Phys., Vol. 57 (1972).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    K. B. Lee, M. W. Thring, J. M. Beer, Combustion and Flame, Vol. 6 (1962), p. 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. A. TesnerandA. M. Tsibulersky, Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, Vol. 3 (1967), p. 163.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. A. Te seer, and A. M. Tsibule rsky, Combustion and Flame, Vol. 11 (1967), p. 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. P. Fenimore and G. W. Jones, J. Phys. Chem., Vol. 7/ (1967), p. 593.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. P. Appleton, “Soot Oxidation Kinetics at Combustion Temperatures”, Paper presented at AGARD Propulsion and Energetics Panel, 41st Meeting, London, England, April (1973).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. W. Radcliffe, and J. P. Appleton, Combust. Sci. and Tech., Vol. 4 (1971), p. 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Reinhold, P. Szargan, P. Nan, and K. Richter, Chem. Techn., Vol. 23 (7) (1971), p. 416.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. J. Thomas, Carbon Vol. 3 (1966), p. 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. D’Alessio, A. DiLorenzo, A. F. Sarofïm, F. Beretta, S. Masi, and C. Venitozzi, “Fifteenth Symposium (International) on Combustion,” The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, (1975), p. 1427. -Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. M. Buleu’icz, C. G. James, and T. M. Sugden, Proc. Roy. Soc. A235 (1956), p. 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. J. McEuan, and L. F. Phillips, Combustion and Flame, Vol. 9 (1965), p. 420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. G. Neoh, “Soot Burnout in Flames’’, Sc.D. Thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, in preparation.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    W. H. Datte/(, G. C. Williams, and H. C. Hottel, Combustion and Flame, Vol. 14 (1970), p. 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. A. Becker, and S. Yamazaki, “Sixteenth Symposium ( International) on Combustion,” The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, (1977), p. 681.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    B. F. Magnussen, “Fifteenth Symposium ( International) on Combustion,” The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, (1975), p. 1415.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    B. F. Magnussen, and B. H. Hjertager, “Sixteenth Symposium ( International) on Combustion,” The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, (1977), p. 719.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. G. Neoh
    • 1
  • J. B. Howard
    • 1
  • A. F. Sarofim
    • 1
  1. 1.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations