Meat-Animal Composition and Its Measurement
Composition is the aggregate of ingredients, their arrangement, and the integrated interrelationship which form a unified, harmonious whole. Figure 8.1 is an example that represents the composite average of cattle, hogs, and sheep and includes the major parts. Because animals are intentionally raised to produce meat for humans, the greatest emphasis is the musculature and its relationship to everything else. The proportion of the animal’s musculature is related to several criteria, but the three most important are visceral proportions (primarily affected by contents of the alimentary canal and pregnancy), fatness, and muscling (as expressed by muscle/bone). Variations in fatness and muscling are illustrated by the exhibits shown in Fig. 8.2., and practical averages of carcass composition (including poultry, fish, and venison) are included in Table 8.1. Since Fig. 8.1 represents a composite of beef, pork and lamb, Figs. 8.3–8.6 are included to illustrate how each of these three species’ parts are divided into muscle, fat, and bone. These are averages that are highly dependent on method of cutting, stage of growth, and heredity.
KeywordsAttenuation Lactate Helium Radioactive Isotope Turkey
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- A.O.A.C. 1990. In: Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed., K. Helrich; ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
- Berg, R.T. and R.M. Butterfield. 1976. New Concepts of Cattle Growth. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
- Ellenberger, H.B., J.A. Newlander, and C.H. Jones. 1950. Compositions of the Bodies of Dairy Cattle, Bulletin 558, Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Vermont, Burlington.Google Scholar
- Fahey, T.J., D.M. Schaefer, R.G. Kauffman, R.J. Epley, P.F. Gould, J.R. Romans, G.C. Smith, and D.G. Topel. 1977. A comparison of practical methods to estimate pork carcass composition. J. Anim. Sci. 44: 8.Google Scholar
- Forrest, J.C., C.H. Kuei, W. Chen, R.S. Lin, A.P. Schinckel, P. Walstra, H. Kooper, and M.D. Judge. 1991. Electromagnetic scanning: carcass evaluation. In: Electronic Evaluation of Meat in Support of Value-Based Marketing. Pages 85 - 111. Purdue Meat Science Industrial Advisory Consortium and Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
- Kauffman, R.G. 1971. Variation in gross composition of meat animals. Proc. Recip. Meat Conf. 24: 292.Google Scholar