Multidimensional Filter Banks and Wavelets pp 151-184 | Cite as

# Multiscale, Statistical Anomaly Detection Analysis and Algorithms for Linearized Inverse Scattering Problems

## Abstract

In this paper we explore the utility of multiscale and statistical techniques for detecting and characterizing the structure of localized anomalies in a medium based upon observations of scattered energy obtained at the boundaries of the region of interest. Wavelet transform techniques are used to provide an efficient and physically meaningful method for modeling the non-anomalous structure of the medium under investigation. We employ decision-theoretic methods both to analyze a variety of difficulties associated with the anomaly detection problem and as the basis for an algorithm to perform anomaly detection and estimation. These methods allow for a quantitative evaluation of the manner in which the performance of the algorithms is impacted by the amplitudes, spatial sizes, and positions of anomalous areas in the overall region of interest. Given the insight provided by this work, we formulate and analyze an algorithm for determining the number, location, and magnitudes associated with a set of anomaly structures. This approach is based upon the use of a Generalized, M-ary Likelihood Ratio Test to successively subdivide the region as a means of localizing anomalous areas in both space and scale. Examples of our multiscale inversion algorithm are presented using the Born approximation of an electrical conductivity problem formulated so as to illustrate many of the features associated with similar detection problems arising in fields such as geophysical prospecting, ultrasonic imaging, and medical imaging.

## Keywords

Electrical Impedance Tomography Anomaly Detection Coarse Scale Anomaly Structure True Anomaly## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.B. Alpert, G. Beylkin, R. Coifman, and V. Rokhlin, “Wavelets for the fast solution of second-kind integral equations,”
*SIAM J. on Scient. Comput.*, vol. 14, no. 1, 1993, pp. 159–184.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 2.M. Bertero, C. De Mol, and E. R. Pike, “Linear inverse problems with discrete data. I: General formulation and singular system analysis,”
*Inverse Problems*, vol. 1, 1985, pp. 301–330.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 3.M. Bertero, C. De Mol, and E. R. Pike, “Linear inverse problems with discrete data. II: Stability and regularisation,”
*Inverse Problems*,*vol*. 4, 1988, pp. 573–594.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 4.G. Beylkin, R. Coifman, and V. Rokhlin, “Fast wavelet transforms and numerical algorithms I,”
*Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics*, vol. 44, 1991, pp. 141–183.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 5.Y. Bresler, J. A. Fessler, and A. Macovski, “A Bayesian approach to reconstruction from incomplete projections of a multiple object 3D domain,”
*IEEE Trans*,*on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence*, vol. 11, no. 8, 1989, pp. 840–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 6.K. E. Brewer and S. W. Wheatcraft, “Including multi-scale information in the characterization of hydraulic conductivity distributions,” In E. Foufoula-Georgiou and P. Kumar (eds.),
*Wavelets in Geophysics*, vol. 4 of*Wavelet Analysis and its Applications*, pp. 213–248. Academic Press, 1994.Google Scholar - 7.S. R. Brown, “Transport of fluid and electric current through a single fracture,”
*Journal of Geophysical Research*, vol. 94, no. B7, 1989, pp. 9429–9438.Google Scholar - 8.W. C. Chew and Y. M. Wang, “Reconstruction of two-dimensional permittivity distribution using the distorted born iterative method,”
*IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging*, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 218–225, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 9.W. C. Chew,
*Waves and Fields in Inhomogeneous Media*, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1990.Google Scholar - 10.K. C. Chou, S. A. Golden, and A. S. Willsky, “Multiresolution stochastic models, data fusion and wavelet transforms,” Technical Report LIDS-P-2110, MIT Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems, 1992.Google Scholar
- 11.K. C. Chou, A. S. Willsky, and R. Nikoukhah, “Multiscale recursive estimation, data fusion, and regularization,”
*IEEE Trans. Automatic Control*, vol. 39, no. 3, 1994, pp. 464–478.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 12.K. C. Chou, A. S. Willsky, and R. Nikoukhah, “Multiscale systems, Kalman filters, and Riccati equations,”
*IEEE Trans. Automatic Control*, vol. 39, no, 3, 1994, pp. 479–492.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 13.D. J. Crossley and O. G. Jensen, “Fractal velocity models in refraction seismology,” In C. H. Scholtz and B. B. Mandelbrot (eds.),
*Fractals in Geophysics*, pp. 61–76. Birkhauser, 1989.Google Scholar - 14.I. Daubechies, “Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets,”
*Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics*, vol. 41, 1988, pp. 909–996.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 15.A. J. Devaney, “Geophysical diffraction tomography,”
*IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing*, vol. GE-22, no. 1, 1984, pp. 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 16.A. J. Devaney and G. A. Tsihrintzis, “Maximum likelihood estimation of object location in diffraction tomography,”
*IEEE Trans. ASSP*, vol. 39, no, 3, 1991, pp. 672–682.Google Scholar - 17.A. J. Devaney and G. A. Tsihrintzis, “Maximum likelihood estimation of object location in diffraction tomography, part II: Strongly scattering objects,”
*IEEE Trans. ASSP*, vol. 39, no. 6, 1991, pp. 1466–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 18.D. C. Dobson, “Estimates on resolution and stabilization for the linearized inverse conductivity problem,”
*Inverse Problems*, vol. 8, 1992, pp. 71–81.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 19.D. C. Dobson and F. Santosa, “An image-enhancement technique for electrical impedance tomography,”
*Inverse Problems*, vol. 10, 1994, pp. 317–334.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - D. C. Dobson and F. Santosa, “Resolution and stability analysis of an inverse problem in electrical impedance tomography: Dependence on the input current patterns,”
*SIAM J Appl. Math.*,vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1542–1560.Google Scholar - P. Flandrin, “Wavelet analysis and synthesis of fractional Brownian motion,”
*IEEE Trans. Information Theory*,vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 910–917.Google Scholar - D. G. Gisser, D. Isaacson, and J. C. Newell, “Electric current computed tomography and eigenvalues,”
*SIAM J. Appl. Math.*,vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1623–1634.Google Scholar - 23.T. M. Habashy, W. C. Chew, and E. Y. Chow, “Simultaneous reconstruction of permittivity and conductivity profiles in a radially inhomogeneous slab,”
*Radio Science*, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 635–645.Google Scholar - 24.T. M. Habashy, E. Y. Chow, and D. G. Dudley, “Profile inversion using the renormalized source-type integral equation approach,”
*IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation*, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 668–682.Google Scholar - 25.T. M. Habashy, R. W. Groom, and B. R. Spies, “Beyond the Born and Rytov approximations: A nonlinear approach to electromagnetic scattering,”
*Journal of Geophysical Research*, vol. 98, no. B2, pp. 1759–1775.Google Scholar - 26.R. F. Harrington,
*Field Computations by Moment Methods*, Macmillan Publ. Co., 1968.Google Scholar - 27.J. H. Hippler, H. Ermert, and L. von Bernus, “Broadband holography applied to eddy current imaging using signals with multiplied phases,”
*Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation*, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 153–162.Google Scholar - 28.S. L. Horowitz and T. Pavlidis, “Picture segmentation by a tree traversal algorithm,”
*Journal of the ACM*, vol. 23, no. 2, 1976, pp. 368–388.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 29.D. Isaacson, “Distinguishability of conductivities by electrical current computed tomography,”
*IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging*, vol. MI-5, no. 2, 1986, pp. 91–95.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 30.D. Isaacson and M. Cheney, “Current problems in impedance imaging,” In D. Colton, R. Ewing, and W. Rundell (eds.),
*Inverse Problems in Partial Differential Equations*, Ch. 9, pp. 141–149. SIAM, 1990.Google Scholar - 31.D. Isaacson and M. Cheney, “Effects of measurement precision and finite numbers of electrodes on linear impedance imaging algorithms,”
*SIAM J. Appl. Math.*, vol. 51, no. 6, 1991, 1705–1731.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 32.D. L. Jaggard, “On fractal electrodynamics,” In H. N. Kritikos and D. L. Jaggard (eds.),
*Recent Advances in Electromagnetic Theory*, pp. 183–224. Springer-Verlag, 1990.Google Scholar - 33.J. M. Lees and P. E. Malin, “Tomographic images of
*p*wave velocity variation at Parkfield, California,”*Journal of Geophysical Research*, vol. 95, no. B 13, 1990, pp. 21, 793–21, 804.Google Scholar - 34.V. Liepa, F. Santosa, and M. Vogelius, “Crack determination from boundary measurements—Reconstruction using experimental data,”
*Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation*,vol. 12, no. 3, 1993, pp. 163–174Google Scholar - 35.S. G. Mallat, “A theory of multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation,”
*IEEE Trans. PAMI*, vol. 11, no. 7, 1989, pp. 674–693.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 36.J. M. Beaulieu and M. Goldberg, “Hierarchy in picture segmentation: A stepwise optimization approach,”
*IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence*, vol. 11, no. 2, 1989, pp. 150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 37.E. L. Miller, “The application of multiscale and statistical techniques to the solution of inverse problems,” Technical Report LIDS-TH-2258, MIT Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems, Cambridge, 1994.Google Scholar
- 38.E. L. Miller, “A scale-recursive, statistically-based method for anomaly characterization in images based upon observations of scattered radiation,” In
*1995 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing*, 1995.Google Scholar - 39.E. L. Miller and A. S. Willsky, “A multiscale approach to sensor fusion and the solution of linear inverse problems,”
*Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis*, vol. 2, 1995, pp. 127–147.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar - 40.E. L. Miller and A. S. Willsky, “Multiscale, statistically-based inversion scheme for the linearized inverse scattering problem,”
*IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing*,March 1996, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 346357.Google Scholar - 41.E. L. Miller and A. S. Willsky, “Wavelet-based, stochastic inverse scattering methods using the extended Born approximation,” In
*Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium*,1995. Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar - 42.J. Le Moigne and J. C. Tilton, “Refining image segmentation by integration of edge and region data,”
*IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing*, vol. 33, no. 3, 1995, pp. 605–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 43.J. E. Molyneux and A. Witten, “Impedance tomography: imaging algorithms for geophysical applications,”
*Inverse Problems*, vol. 10, 1994, pp. 655–667.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 44.D. J. Rossi and A. S. Willsky, “Reconstruction from projections based on detection and estimation of objects—parts I and II: Performance analysis and robustness analysis,”
*IEEE Trans. on ASSP*, vol. ASSP-32, no. 4, 1984, pp. 886–906.Google Scholar - 45.K. Sauer, J. Sachs, Jr., and C. Klifa, “Bayesian estimation of 3D objects from few radiographs,”
*IEEE Trans. Nuclear Science*, vol. 41, no. 5, 1994, pp. 1780–1790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 46.A. Schatzberg, A. J. Devaney, and A. J. Witten, “Estimating target location from scattered field data,”
*Signal Processing*, vol. 40, 1994, pp. 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - A. H. Tewfick and M. Kim, “Correlation structure of the discrete wavelet coefficients of fractional Brownian motion,”
*IEEE Trans. Information Theory*,vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 904–909.Google Scholar - 48.C. Torres-Verdin and T. M. Habashy, “Rapid 2.5-D forward modeling and inversion via a new nonlinear scattering approximation,”
*Radio Science*, 1994, pp. 1051–1079.Google Scholar - 49.H. L. Van Trees,
*Detection*,*Estimation and Modulation Theory: Part I*. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1968.MATHGoogle Scholar - 50.G. W. Womell, “A Karhuenen-Loeve-like expansion for 1/f processes via wavelets,”
*IEEE Transactions on Information Theory*, vol. 36, 1990, pp. 859–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar