Abstract
In the study of markedness, there are two possible approaches to explaining markedness. On the one hand, one could simply say that markedness is a formal property of grammars, at best to be explained as part of the panhuman species-specific genetic inheritance of language users as members of the species homo sapiens. On the other hand, one could try to account for markedness in terms of other, independently verifiable properties of people, the world, or people’s conception of the world. In this paper, I shall be arguing that, at least in a large number of instances, this second approach provides a viable explanation for observed markedness facts, including crucially a number of instances where there is no formal reason to assume that the markedness facts would fall out the way they do: either the opposite distribution of markedness would be equally simple formally, or some other distribution of markedness would be considerably more simple formally.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, Barbara J. and Frantz, Donald G. 1978. ‘Verb agreement in Southern Tiwa’. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 11 – 17.
Chomsky, Noam and Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. ‘Ergativity and grammatical relations in Kalaw Lagaw Ya ( Saibai dialect)’. Australian Journal of Linguistics. 1, 1–42.
Dixon, R.M.W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dixon, R.M.W. 1977. A Grammar of Yidiny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.
Lynch, John. 1983. ‘Switch Reference in Lenakel’. In Haiman, John and Pamela Munro, eds., Switch reference and universal grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Minassian, Martiros. 1980. Grammaire d’arménien oriental. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.
Nedjalkov, V.P. 1979. ‘Degrees of ergativity in Chukchee’. In Plank, F., ed., Ergativity: towards a theory of grammatical relations. London: Academic Press. Pages 241 – 262.
Postal, Paul M. 1970. ‘On coreferential complement subject deletion’. Linguistic Inquiry 1, 439 – 500.
Rosenbaum, Peter S. 1967. The grammar of English predicate complement constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. ‘Hierarchies of features and ergativity’. In Dixon, R.M.W., ed., Grammatical categories in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies. Pages 112 – 171.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Comrie, B. (1986). Markedness, Grammar, People, and the World. In: Eckman, F.R., Moravcsik, E.A., Wirth, J.R. (eds) Markedness. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5718-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5718-7_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3205-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-5718-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive