Advertisement

The BABY Project

  • P. A. P. Rogers
  • M. Lefley
Chapter
Part of the The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science book series (SECS, volume 511)

Abstract

Language plays a central role in human communication. The benefits gained by building machines having the ability to perform natural language processing (NLP), “cannot be underestimated” (Joshi, 1991). Since this publication, those words relate to much wider language domains in light of the explosion of electronic textual information. Consider the benefits to humanity if machines existed which were able to assimilate knowledge by reading large volumes of text, précising, prioritorizing and presenting it from the perspective of particular contexts or different languages.

Keywords

Natural Language Processing Input Stimulus Input String Wide Domain Stimulus Element 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, R. 1973. A First Language. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Collier, R. 1994. An Historical Overview of Natural Language Processing Systems that Learn. Artificial Intelligence Review. 8 (1): 17–54.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cottrell, G. W. 1989. A Connectionist Approach to Word Sense Disambiguation, Pitman Publishing: London.Google Scholar
  4. Crain, S. 1991. Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioural and Brain Sciences. 14 (4): 597–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Elman, J. L. 1990. Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14 (2): 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ervin, S. 1964. Imitation and Structural Change in Children’s Language. New Directions in the Study of Language. E. Lenneberg. MET Press: Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
  7. Gold, E. 1967. Language Identification in the Limit. Information and Control. 16: 447–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hanson, S. J. and Kelg, J. 1987. PARSNIP: A Connectionist Network that Learns NaturalGoogle Scholar
  9. Language Grammar from Exposure. The Ninth Annual Conference of the CognitiveScience Society,106–119.Google Scholar
  10. Seattle, Washington. Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ. Joshi, A. K. 1991. Natural Language Processing. Science. 11(4): 1242–1249.Google Scholar
  11. Kuczaj, S. A. 1977. The Acquistion of Regular and Irregular Past Tense Forms. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour. 16: 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Manaris, B. Z. and Slator, B. S. 1996. Interactive Natural Language Processing: building on success. Computer 29 (7): 28–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meier, P. R. 1991. Language Acquisition by Deaf Children. American Scientist. 79 (1): 60–70.Google Scholar
  14. Newell, A. and Simon, H. A. 1976. Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry: symbols and search. Communication of the ACM. 19 (3): 113–126.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pollack, J. B. 1990. Recursive Distributed Representations. Artificial Intelligence. 46: 77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rich, E. and Knight, K. 1991. Artificial Intelligence., McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY. Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L. 1986a. On Learning the Past Tense of EnglishGoogle Scholar
  17. Verbs. Parallel Distributed Processing, Volume 2: Psychological and Biological Models. J. E. McClelland and D. E. Rumelhart, 2: 216–271.Google Scholar
  18. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. Sejnowski, T. J. and Rosenburg, C. R. 1987. Parallel Networks that Learn to Pronounce English Text. Complex Systems. 1: 145–168.Google Scholar
  19. Sejnowski, T. J. and Rosenburg, C. R. 1987. Parallel Networks that Learn to Pronounce English Text. Complex Systems. 1: 145–168.MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Waltz, D. L. and Pollock, J. B. 1985. Massively Parallel Parsing. Cognitive Science: a strongly interactive model of natural language interpretation. 9: 51–74.Google Scholar
  21. Wermter, S. 1995. Hybrid Connectionist Natural Language Processing., Chapman and Hall: London.Google Scholar
  22. Wermter, S. and Weber, V. 1996. Interactive Spoken-Language Processing in a Hybrid Connectionist System. Computer 29 (7): 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. A. P. Rogers
  • M. Lefley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations