Advertisement

Designing for Naturalness in Automated Dialogues

  • C. Cheepen
  • J. Monaghan
Chapter
Part of the The Springer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science book series (SECS, volume 511)

Abstract

Many of the automated telephone dialogue systems currently in commercial operation are intended to be used by the general public. This means that the typical human callers who use the system/s are essentially novice users who do not build up expertise over a period of time To cater for such a user group, designers strive to make their dialogues as ‘natural’ as possible. In this paper we discuss and illustrate what ‘naturalness’ means in the context of the kind of automated dialogues which are at present in operation. We present some examples from automated dialogues, focusing particularly on openings, closings, confirmations and repairs, and compare these with the way similar operations are carried out in human-human dialogues. We summarise a set of experiments carried out recently to investigate how callers respond to supposed ‘naturalness’ in automated dialogue systems, and we conclude with some comments which challenge current ideas about what really is ‘natural’ for an automated dialogue.

Keywords

Automate System Dialogue System Interactional Material Speech Event Interactional Content 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Attwater, D.J. et al., 1996. Dialogue design in advanced speech applications BTRL Research publicationsGoogle Scholar
  2. Aust, H. 1996. Dialogue Modelling. In Proceedings of The Fourth European Summer School on Language and Speech Communication, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, G. and Yule G. 1983. Teaching the Spoken Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. Cheepen, C. 1988. The Predictability of Informal Conversation, Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
  5. Cheepen, C. 1994. Friendliness and user friendliness in speech-driven interface design, Pragmatics, 4: 1.Google Scholar
  6. Foster, J.C., Dutton, R., Jack M.A., Love, S., Nairn, I.A., Vergeynest, N. and Stentiford, F. 1992. Design and evaluation of dialogues for automated telephone services, Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics Autumn Conference, Speech and Hearing, Windermere.Google Scholar
  7. Monaghan, J. 1992. Fundamental research underlying the design of an automated dictation system, Proceedings of Institute of Acoustics Autumn Conference, Speech and Hearing.Google Scholar
  8. Schegloff, E.A. and Sacks, H. 1974. Opening up closings. 1973, in Turner, R. (ed). Ethnomethodology, Penguin.Google Scholar
  9. Williams, D. and Cheepen, C. 1998 (in press) “Just speak naturally”: designing for naturalness in automated spoken dialogues’, Proceedings of CHI `98.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Cheepen
  • J. Monaghan

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations