Advertisement

Survival Models for Heterogeneity Using the Non-Central Chi-Squared Distribution with Zero Degrees of Freedom

  • Cristina S. Rocha
Chapter

Abstract

The existence of homogeneity between individuals for given covariate values is an assumption which is usually made in the analysis of survival data. Nevertheless, there is an increasing concern about the impact of unobserved heterogeneity due, for instance, to the fact that it may not have been possible to record all relevant risk factors. This has led to the development of frailty models. The multiplicative model has been widely used with several choices for the frailty distribution. Here, we consider an alternative model, where frailty acts additively on the hazard function. Also, in order to develop a survival model for heterogeneity which allows for a non-susceptible group of individuals, we propose the non-central chi-squared distribution with zero degrees of freedom as a frailty distribution. Its basic properties, together with the results obtained by its application to the additive model, as well as to the multiplicative one, will be presented.

Keywords

Additive Model Hazard Function Unobserved Heterogeneity Zero Degree Multiplicative Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aalen, O.O. (1988), “Heterogeneity in Survival Analysis,” Statistics in Medicine, 7, 1121–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aalen, O.O. (1992), “Modelling Heterogeneity in Survival Analysis by the Compound Poisson Distribution,” Annals of Applied Probability, 2, 951–972.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Feller, W. (1971), An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, vol. 2, New York, Wiley.MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Hougaard, P. (1984), “Life Table Methods for Heterogeneous Populations: Distributions Describing the Heterogeneity,” Biometrika, 71, 75–83.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Johnson, N.L. and Kotz, S. (1970), Distributions in Statistics. Continuous Univariate Distributions (2 vols), Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  6. Rocha, C.S. (1992), “Additive Models for Heterogeneity in Survival Analysis,” Notas e Comunicaçbes do Centro de Estatística e Aplicaçbes da Universidade de Lisboa, Nota no-1.Google Scholar
  7. Siegel, A.F. (1979), “The Noncentral Chi-squared Distribution with Zero Degrees of Freedom”, Biometrika, 66, 381–386.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Vaupel, J., Manton, K. and Stallard, E. (1979), “The Impact of Heterogeneity in Individual Frailty on the Dynamics of Mortality,” Demography, 16, 439–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristina S. Rocha
    • 1
  1. 1.University of LisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations