Fitting Cox’s Proportional Hazards Model Using Grouped Survival Data

  • Ian W. McKeague
  • Mei-Jie Zhang


Cox’s proportional hazard model is often fit to grouped survival data (i.e., occurrence and exposure data over various specified time-intervals and covariate bins), as opposed to continuous data. The practical limits to using such data for inference in the Cox model are investigated. A large sample theory, allowing the bins and time-intervals to shrink as the sample size increase, is developed. It turns out that the usual estimator of the regression parameter is asymptotically biased under optimal rates of convergence. The asymptotic bias is found, and an assessment of the effect on inference is given.


Bias Correction Calendar Period Baseline Hazard Function Asymptotic Bias Large Sample Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersen, P. K. and Gill, R. D. (1982), “Cox’s regression model for counting processes: a large sample study,” Ann. Statist., 10, 1100–1120.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bickel, P. J. and Wichura, M. J. (1971), “Convergence criteria for multiparameter stochastic processes and some applications,” Ann. Statist., 42, 1656–1670.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Breslow, N. E. (1986), “Cohort analysis in epidemiology,” in A. C. Atkinson and S. E. Fienberg, eds., A Celebration of Statistics: the ISI Centenary Volume, Springer-Verlag, New York, 109–143.Google Scholar
  4. Cox, D. R. (1972), “Regression models and life tables (with discussion),” J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B, 34, 187–220.MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Hahn, M. G. (1978), “Central limit theorems in D[0, 1]”, Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete, 44, 89–102.Google Scholar
  6. Hoem, J. M. (1987), “Statistical analysis of a multiplicative model and its application to the standardization of vital rates: a review,” Int. Statist. Rev., 55, 119–152.Google Scholar
  7. Holford, T. R. (1976), “Life tables with concomitant information,” Biometrics, 32, 587–597.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huet, S. and Kaddour, A. (1994), “Maximum likelihood estimation in survival analysis with grouped data on censored individuals and continuous data on failures,” App1. Statist., 43, 325–333.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kalbfleisch, J. D. and Prentice, R. L. (1973), “Marginal likelihoods based on Cox’s regression and life model,” Biometrika, 60, 267–278.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Laird, N. and Olivier, D. (1981), “Covariance analysis of censored survival data using loglinear analysis techniques,” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 76, 231–240.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McKeague, I. W. and Zhang, M.J. (1994), “Sheppard’s correction for grouping in Cox’s Proportional hazards model,” Technical Report 5, 1994, Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  12. Pons O. and Turckheim, E. de (1987), “Estimation in Cox’s periodic model with a histogramtype estimator for the underlying intensity,” Scand. J. Statist., 14, 329–345.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Prentice R. L. and Gloeckler L. A. (1978), “Regression analysis of grouped survival data with application to breast cancer data,” Biometrics, 34, 57–67.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Selmer, R. (1990), “A comparison of Poisson regression models fitted to multiway summary tables and Cox’s survival model using data from a blood pressure screening in the city of Bergen, Norway,” Statistics in Medicine, 9, 1157–1165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian W. McKeague
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mei-Jie Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of StatisticsFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  2. 2.Division of BiostatisticsMedical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations