Advertisement

Empirical Support for Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

  • Lance E. Trexler
Part of the Critical Issues in Neuropsychology book series (CINP)

Abstract

The theoretical, clinical, and empirical sophistication of the field of brain injury rehabilitation has evolved exponentially over the last two decades. Traditional physical rehabilitation models did not address the unique needs of the patient with acquired brain injury, particularly the long-term psychosocial and community reentry difficulties experienced by these patients and their families. New models for the rehabilitation of persons with brain damage have of necessity been developed. These new paradigms, particularly in postacute brain injury rehabilitation, transcend physical restoration models to embrace cognitive and neurobehavioral, social, and experiential aspects of recovery and rehabilitation.

Keywords

Traumatic Brain Injury Brain Injury Psychosocial Adjustment Acquire Brain Injury Cognitive Remediation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ben-Yishay, Y., and Diller, L. (1993). Cognitive remediation in traumatic brain injury: Update and issues. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 204–213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-Yishay, Y., and Prigatano, G.P. (1990). Cognitive remediation. In: M. Rosenthal, E.R. Griffith, M.R. Bond, and J.D. Miller (Eds.), Rehabilitation of the adult and child with traumatic brain injury, ( 2nd ed., pp. 393–409 ). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis.Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Yishay, Y., Silver, S. M., Piasetsky, E., and Rattock, J. (1987). Relationship between employability and vocational outcome after intensive holistic cognitive rehabilitation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 2, 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergquist, T. E, Boll, T. J., Corrigan, J. D., Harley, J. P., Malec, J. F., Millis, S. R., and Schmidt, M. R. (1994). Neuropsychological rehabilitation: Proceedings of a consensus conference. Brain Injury, 9, 50–61.Google Scholar
  5. Brooks, N. D. (1991). Editorial. The effectiveness of postacute rehabilitation. Brain Injury, 5, 103–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christensen, A.-L., Pinner, E. M., Moller-Pedersen, P., Teasdale, T. W, and Trexler, L. E. (1992). Psychosocial outcome following individualized neuropsychological rehabilitation of brain damage. Acta Neurologica Scandanavia, 85, 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Levin, H. S., Benton, A. L., and Grossman, R. G. (1982). Neurobehavioral consequences of closed head injury. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Lezak, M. D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment ( 3rd ed. ). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Lubuski,A. A., Moore, A. D., Stambrook, M., and Gill, D. D. (1994). Cognitive beliefs following severe traumatic brain injury: Association with post injury employment. Brain Injury, 8, 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Malec, J. F., and Basford, J. R. (1996). Postacute brain injury rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77, 198–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Malec, J. F., Smigielski, J. S., DePompolo, R. W, andThompson, J. M. (1993). Outcome evaluation and prediction in a comprehensive-integrated postacute outpatient brain injury rehabilitation programme. Brain Injury, 7, 15–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mauer, B. A., Glueckauf, R., Tomusk, A., Trexler, L. E., and Diller, L. (1996). Development and initial evaluation of the rehabilitation program styles survey. Paper presented at the proceedings of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.Google Scholar
  13. Moore, A. D., and Stambrook, M. (1992). Coping strategies and locus of control following traumatic brain injury: Relationship to long term outcome. Brain Injury, 6, 89–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moore, A. D., Stambrook, M., and Wilson, K. G. (1991). Cognitive moderators in adjustment to chronic illness: Locus of control beliefs following traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 1, 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research (NCMRR). (1993). Research plan for the National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research. NIH Publication No. 93–3509. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
  16. Prigatano, G. P. (1992). Neuropsychological rehabilitation and the problem of altered self-awareness. In N. von Steinbüchel, D. Y. von Cramon, and E. Poppel (Eds.), Neuropsychological rehabilitation (pp. 55–65 ). Berlin: Springer- Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Prigatano, G. P., Fordyce, D. J., Zeiner, H. K., Roueche, J. R., Pepping, M., and Wood, B. D. (1984). Neuropsychological rehabilitation after closed head injury in young adults. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 47, 505–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Prigatano, G. P., Klonoff, P. S., O’Brien, K. P., Altman, I. M., Amin, K., Chiapello, D., Shepard, J., Cunningham, M., and Mora, M. (1994). Productivity after neuropsychologically oriented milieu rehabilitation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 9, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Trexler, L. E. and Fordyce, D. J. (1995). Psychological perspectives on rehabilitation: Contemporary assessment and intervention strategies. In R. L. Braddom (Ed.), Physical medicine and rehabilitation (pp. 66–81 ). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders.Google Scholar
  20. Trexler, L. E, and Sullivan, C. (1995). Neuropsychological perspectives on traumatic brain injury. In M. Zettin, and R. Rago (Eds.), Head injury: neuropsychological and behavioral sequalae (pp. 36–52 ). Torino, Italy: BollatiBoringhieri.Google Scholar
  21. Trexler, L. E., Diller, L., Glueckauf, R., Tomusk, A., Anreiter, B., Ben-Yishay, Y., Buckingham, D., Christensen, A-L., Grant, M., Klonoff, P., Malec, J. E, Mauer, B., and Seller, S. (1994). Consensus conference on the development of a multicenter study on the efficacy of neuropsychological rehabilitation. Zionsville, Indiana.Google Scholar
  22. Willer, B., Rosenthal, M., Kreutzer, J. S., Gordon, W. A., and Rembel, R. (1993). Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lance E. Trexler
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Neuropsychological RehabilitationIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations