Advertisement

Are Autopsies still Useful in the Intensive Care Unit?

  • G. Dimopoulos

Abstract

As early as 1912, autopsy was noted by Cabot to be a medical procedure to obtain a diagnosis in complex cases, to provide quality assessment of clinical practice, and to improve understanding of medical limitations [1, 2]. Anderson et al. [3] defined quality assessment as the quantitative evaluation of results or outcomes ranged within predefined acceptable limits Although in the United States, the institutional requirements of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education stated that a sufficient number of autopsies should be performed to maintain quality of patient care and for educational purposes, the autopsy rate has fallen over recent decades, from 50% in the 1940s to 10% in the 1980s [4]. This decline has been attributed to a number of factors, including:
  • the fear of diagnostic errors being detected at autopsy;

  • heary work for the pathologists;

  • the high non-reimbursable cost involved in the procedure;

  • difficulties in obtain consent from the family; and

  • the greater sensitivity and specificity of modern diagnostic techniques [5, 6].

Keywords

Accreditation Council Autopsy Rate Presume Consent Institutional Requirement Postmortem Diagnosis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cabot RC (1912) Diagnostic pitfalls identified during a study of 3000 autopsies. JAMA 59: 2295–2298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goldman L (1984) Diagnostic advances vs the valve of the autopsy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 108: 501–505PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson RE (1984) The autopsy as an instrument of quality assessment: Classification of postmortem and premortem diagnostic discrepancies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 108: 490–493PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (1996) Revised essentials of accredited residencies in graduate medical education. Part I, Institutional Requirements. ACGME Bulletin. ACGME, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Landefeld CS, Chren MM, Myers A, Geller R, Robbins S, Goldman L (1988) Diagnostic yield of the autopsy in a university hospital and a community hospital. N Engl J Med 318: 1249–1254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McPhee SJ, Bottles K (1985) Autopsy: Moribund art or viral science? Am J Med 78: 107–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hasson J, Gross H (1974) The autopsy and quality assessment of medical care. Am J Med 56: 137–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Battle R, Pathack D, Humble CC, et al (1987) Factors influencing discrepancies between premortem and postmortem diagnosis. JAMA 258: 339–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cameron HM, McCoogan E (1981) A prospective study of 1152 hospital autopsies. II. Analysis of inaccuracies in clinical diagnoses and their significance. J Pathol 133: 285–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gibinski K, Hartleb M, Koturbasz D (1985) Comparison between pre-and post-mortem diagnoses in a consecutive series of patients. Scand J Gastroenterol 20: 370–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stephanovic G, Tucakovic G, Dotlic R, Kanjuh V (1986) Correlation of clinical diagnoses with athopsy findings: A retrospective study of 2145 consecutive autopsies. Hum Pathol 17: 1225–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Landefeld CS, Goldman L (1989) The autopsy in clinical medicine. Mayo Clin Proc 64: 1185–1189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S, et al (1983) The value of autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med 308: 1000–1005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fernandez-Segoviano P, Lazaro A, Esteban A, et al (1988) Autopsy as quality assurance in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 16: 683–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Blosser SA, Zimmerman HE, Stauffer JL (1998) Do autopsies of critically ill patients reveal important findings that were clinically undetected. Crit Care Med 26: 1332–1336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mort TC, Yeston NS (1999) The relationship of pre-mortem diagnoses and post-mortem findings in a surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 27: 299–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roosen J, Frans E, Wilmer A, Knockaert DC, Bobbaers H (2000) Comparison of postmortem clinical diagnoses in critically ill patients and subsequent autopsy findings. Mayo Clin Proc 75: 562–657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tai D, El-Bilbeisi H, Tewari S, et al (2001) A study of consecutive autopsies in a medical ICU. A comparison of clinical cause of death and autopsy diagnosis. Chest 119: 530–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Podbregar M, Voga G, Krivec B, Skale R, Poreznik R, Gabrescek L (2001) Should we confirm our clinical diagnostic certainty by autopsies. Intensive Care Med 27: 1756–1761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Goldstein B, Metlay L, Cox C, Rubenstein JS (1996) Association of pre mortem diagnosis and autopsy findings in pediatric intensive care unit versus emergency department versus ward patients. Crit Care Med 24: 683–686PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cameron HM, McCoogan E, Watson H (1980) Necropsy: a yardstick for clinical diagnoses. Br Med J 281: 985–988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ferretti GR, Bosson JL, Buffaz PD, et al (1997) Acute pulmonary embolism: Role of helical CT in 164 patients with intermediate probability at ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy and normal results at duplex US of the legs. Radiology 205: 453–458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gouello JP, Asfar P, Brenet O, et al (2000) Nosocomial endocarditis in the intensive care unit: An analysis of 22 cases. Crit Care Med 28: 377–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Geha DJ, Roberts GD (1994) Laboratory detection of fungemia. Clin Lab Med 14: 83–97PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Niederman MS, Torres A, Summer W (1994) Invasive diagnosis testing is not needed routinely to manage suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 150: 565–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goldman L (1986) Autopsy: seventy-five years after Gabot. J Am Geriatr Soc 34: 897–898PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dimopoulos G, Piagnerelli M, Berrè J, Salmon I, Vincent JL (2000) Post mortem examination in the ICU. Still useful? Crit Care Med 28:78 a (Abst)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ahronheim JC, Bernholc AS, Clark WD (1983) Age trends in autopsy rates: striking decline in late life. JAMA 250: 1182–1186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Dimopoulos

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations